{"title":"MRI对腰痛的x线预测。","authors":"Robert J McCormick, Michael D Perloff","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging use in low back pain management can be associated with added costs and increased surgical interventions. Lumbar x-ray findings predicting magnetic resonance imaging results were assessed in patients with low back pain, excluding postsurgical, red flag, or spinal stenosis history. At an outpatient pain clinic, 100 patients were selected (sequentially) from 12/1/2021 to 3/15/2022 that had lumbar x-rays within 1 yr prior to lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging reports were analyzed by two readers. Forty-six patients had moderate facet hypertrophy on x-ray, 35 (76.1%) also had moderate facet hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's rank correlation Rs = 0.386, P < 0.0001). Thirty-eight patients had moderate multilevel degenerative changes on x-ray, 34 (89.5%) also had moderate disc bulge on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.360, P < 0.001). Eighteen patients who had moderate disc height loss on x-ray, 14 (77.8%) also had moderate disc desiccation, height loss, or space narrowing on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.554, P < 0.00000001). Forty-three patients had a listhesis on x-ray, and 20 (46.5%) also had a listhesis on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.458, P < 0.0001). Lumbar x-ray is a reasonable study in the setting of axial and subacute radicular low back pain, where red flags are absent, predicting moderate pathology on magnetic resonance imaging > 75% of the time, and being more sensitive for listhesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"671-674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"X-ray Prediction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J McCormick, Michael D Perloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging use in low back pain management can be associated with added costs and increased surgical interventions. Lumbar x-ray findings predicting magnetic resonance imaging results were assessed in patients with low back pain, excluding postsurgical, red flag, or spinal stenosis history. At an outpatient pain clinic, 100 patients were selected (sequentially) from 12/1/2021 to 3/15/2022 that had lumbar x-rays within 1 yr prior to lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging reports were analyzed by two readers. Forty-six patients had moderate facet hypertrophy on x-ray, 35 (76.1%) also had moderate facet hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's rank correlation Rs = 0.386, P < 0.0001). Thirty-eight patients had moderate multilevel degenerative changes on x-ray, 34 (89.5%) also had moderate disc bulge on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.360, P < 0.001). Eighteen patients who had moderate disc height loss on x-ray, 14 (77.8%) also had moderate disc desiccation, height loss, or space narrowing on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.554, P < 0.00000001). Forty-three patients had a listhesis on x-ray, and 20 (46.5%) also had a listhesis on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.458, P < 0.0001). Lumbar x-ray is a reasonable study in the setting of axial and subacute radicular low back pain, where red flags are absent, predicting moderate pathology on magnetic resonance imaging > 75% of the time, and being more sensitive for listhesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"671-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002741\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:磁共振成像(MRI)在腰痛(LBP)治疗中的应用可能会增加成本和增加手术干预。评估腰痛患者的腰椎x线检查预测MRI结果,排除术后、危险信号或椎管狭窄史。在一家疼痛门诊,从2021年1月12日至2022年3月15日(按顺序)选择了100名在腰椎MRI前1年内进行腰椎x光检查的患者。2位读者分析了x线和MRI报告。x线表现为中度小关节突肥大46例,MRI表现为中度小关节突肥大35例(76.1%)(Spearman秩相关Rs = 0.386, p < 0.0001)。x线表现为中度多级别退行性变38例,MRI表现为中度椎间盘突出34例(89.5%)(Spearman’s Rs = 0.360, p < 0.001)。18例x线表现为中度椎间盘高度下降,14例(77.8%)MRI表现为中度椎间盘干燥、高度下降或间隙缩小(Spearman’s Rs = 0.554, p < 0.00000001)。x线脱位43例,MRI脱位20例(46.5%)(Spearman’s Rs = 0.458, p < 0.0001)。腰椎x线检查对于轴向性和亚急性神经根性腰痛是一项合理的研究,在这些情况下,没有红色信号,在MRI >上预测中度病理的概率为75%,并且对脱位更敏感。
X-ray Prediction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Low Back Pain.
Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging use in low back pain management can be associated with added costs and increased surgical interventions. Lumbar x-ray findings predicting magnetic resonance imaging results were assessed in patients with low back pain, excluding postsurgical, red flag, or spinal stenosis history. At an outpatient pain clinic, 100 patients were selected (sequentially) from 12/1/2021 to 3/15/2022 that had lumbar x-rays within 1 yr prior to lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging reports were analyzed by two readers. Forty-six patients had moderate facet hypertrophy on x-ray, 35 (76.1%) also had moderate facet hypertrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's rank correlation Rs = 0.386, P < 0.0001). Thirty-eight patients had moderate multilevel degenerative changes on x-ray, 34 (89.5%) also had moderate disc bulge on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.360, P < 0.001). Eighteen patients who had moderate disc height loss on x-ray, 14 (77.8%) also had moderate disc desiccation, height loss, or space narrowing on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.554, P < 0.00000001). Forty-three patients had a listhesis on x-ray, and 20 (46.5%) also had a listhesis on magnetic resonance imaging (Spearman's Rs = 0.458, P < 0.0001). Lumbar x-ray is a reasonable study in the setting of axial and subacute radicular low back pain, where red flags are absent, predicting moderate pathology on magnetic resonance imaging > 75% of the time, and being more sensitive for listhesis.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).