农业中使用个人防护装备的决定因素:来自厄瓜多尔的见解。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cristian Vasco
{"title":"农业中使用个人防护装备的决定因素:来自厄瓜多尔的见解。","authors":"Cristian Vasco","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36370-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Personal protective equipment (PPE) is important to reduce the adverse effects of pesticides on human health. Nevertheless, there are several factors why farmers decide not to use PPE. With official data from the Continuous Area and Agricultural Production Survey (ESPAC) 2022, this paper analyzes the determinants of the use of PPE in Ecuadorian agriculture. This large data set (<i>n</i> = 10,039) with national representation provides a complete picture of the country’s diverse ethnicities, geographies, and crops. The results reveal that a majority of operators in the sample (96.53%) used at least one PPE item while handling pesticides, with long sleeve shirts and rubber boots the most frequently used PPE items. The results of a Poisson regression model show that the use of PPE is strongly influenced by ethnicity, with indigenous, afro-Ecuadorian, and montubio operators wearing fewer PPE items than their mestizo peers. Overall, wealthier and more educated operators who have received training on the use of pesticides are more willing to wear PPE. Similarly, those who use less toxic (Class II and Class III) pesticides wear more PPE items. Operators engaged in the production of rice, plantains, and potatoes are less willing to wear PPE items, while those growing bananas, oil palm, and broccoli tend to use more PPE items. Developing ethnic-specific training programs that observe indigenous knowledge, cultural beliefs, and practices and increasing the availability of low-cost PPE are explored as alternatives to promote the use of PPE in Ecuadorian agriculture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 17","pages":"11114 - 11125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The determinants of the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in agriculture: insights from Ecuador\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Vasco\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36370-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Personal protective equipment (PPE) is important to reduce the adverse effects of pesticides on human health. Nevertheless, there are several factors why farmers decide not to use PPE. With official data from the Continuous Area and Agricultural Production Survey (ESPAC) 2022, this paper analyzes the determinants of the use of PPE in Ecuadorian agriculture. This large data set (<i>n</i> = 10,039) with national representation provides a complete picture of the country’s diverse ethnicities, geographies, and crops. The results reveal that a majority of operators in the sample (96.53%) used at least one PPE item while handling pesticides, with long sleeve shirts and rubber boots the most frequently used PPE items. The results of a Poisson regression model show that the use of PPE is strongly influenced by ethnicity, with indigenous, afro-Ecuadorian, and montubio operators wearing fewer PPE items than their mestizo peers. Overall, wealthier and more educated operators who have received training on the use of pesticides are more willing to wear PPE. Similarly, those who use less toxic (Class II and Class III) pesticides wear more PPE items. Operators engaged in the production of rice, plantains, and potatoes are less willing to wear PPE items, while those growing bananas, oil palm, and broccoli tend to use more PPE items. Developing ethnic-specific training programs that observe indigenous knowledge, cultural beliefs, and practices and increasing the availability of low-cost PPE are explored as alternatives to promote the use of PPE in Ecuadorian agriculture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 17\",\"pages\":\"11114 - 11125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36370-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36370-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个人防护装备对于减少农药对人体健康的不良影响具有重要意义。然而,有几个因素导致农民决定不使用个人防护装备。根据2022年连续面积和农业生产调查(ESPAC)的官方数据,本文分析了厄瓜多尔农业中使用个人防护装备的决定因素。这个具有全国代表性的大型数据集(n = 10,039)提供了该国不同种族、地理和作物的完整图景。结果显示,样本中大多数操作人员(96.53%)在操作农药时至少使用一件个人防护用品,其中长袖衬衫和胶靴是使用频率最高的个人防护用品。泊松回归模型的结果显示,个人防护装备的使用受到种族的强烈影响,土著、非裔厄瓜多尔人和蒙图比奥操作员比他们的混血儿同行佩戴的个人防护装备更少。总体而言,接受过农药使用培训的较富裕和受教育程度较高的操作人员更愿意佩戴个人防护装备。同样,那些使用毒性较小(II类和III类)农药的人佩戴的个人防护装备也更多。种植水稻、大蕉、土豆的经营者佩戴PPE的意愿较低,而种植香蕉、油棕、西兰花的经营者佩戴PPE的意愿较高。开发符合土著知识、文化信仰和实践的特定民族培训项目,增加低成本个人防护装备的供应,作为促进个人防护装备在厄瓜多尔农业中使用的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The determinants of the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) in agriculture: insights from Ecuador

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is important to reduce the adverse effects of pesticides on human health. Nevertheless, there are several factors why farmers decide not to use PPE. With official data from the Continuous Area and Agricultural Production Survey (ESPAC) 2022, this paper analyzes the determinants of the use of PPE in Ecuadorian agriculture. This large data set (n = 10,039) with national representation provides a complete picture of the country’s diverse ethnicities, geographies, and crops. The results reveal that a majority of operators in the sample (96.53%) used at least one PPE item while handling pesticides, with long sleeve shirts and rubber boots the most frequently used PPE items. The results of a Poisson regression model show that the use of PPE is strongly influenced by ethnicity, with indigenous, afro-Ecuadorian, and montubio operators wearing fewer PPE items than their mestizo peers. Overall, wealthier and more educated operators who have received training on the use of pesticides are more willing to wear PPE. Similarly, those who use less toxic (Class II and Class III) pesticides wear more PPE items. Operators engaged in the production of rice, plantains, and potatoes are less willing to wear PPE items, while those growing bananas, oil palm, and broccoli tend to use more PPE items. Developing ethnic-specific training programs that observe indigenous knowledge, cultural beliefs, and practices and increasing the availability of low-cost PPE are explored as alternatives to promote the use of PPE in Ecuadorian agriculture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信