Alison Davie, Sory Traoré, Waleed Badreldin, Astrid Torstensson, Esra Cakar, Anuja C McCullough, Susan Tempelaar, Elisabeth Fenwick, Peter S Hall
{"title":"Abemaciclib联合辅助内分泌治疗HR+、HER2-、淋巴结阳性、高危早期乳腺癌的成本-效果分析","authors":"Alison Davie, Sory Traoré, Waleed Badreldin, Astrid Torstensson, Esra Cakar, Anuja C McCullough, Susan Tempelaar, Elisabeth Fenwick, Peter S Hall","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03164-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The monarchE trial demonstrated that the addition of 2 years of abemaciclib to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduced the risk of disease recurrence in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), node-positive early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of disease recurrence. Abemaciclib meets a critical unmet need for more effective adjuvant therapy for this patient population. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness (CE) of abemaciclib plus ET compared to ET alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A five-state cohort transition model, which presents a United Kingdom (UK) perspective, is parameterized using data from the monarchE trial and literature. Cost-effectiveness results are presented in terms of cost/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over a lifetime time horizon. Various assumptions were tested through sensitivity and scenario analyses and uncertainty was assessed through probabilistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving abemaciclib plus ET were predicted to experience higher QALYs (11.16 compared to 10.42) at an increased cost (£87,541 compared to £48,625), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £52,317 per QALY gain compared to ET alone. The increased costs associated with the addition of abemaciclib were partially offset by a reduction in distant disease recurrence and associated costs. The scenario and sensitivity analyses supported robust base case results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the ICER exceeding usual willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels in the UK, a consequence of using list prices, the CE model utilizing the latest data cut from the monarchE trial, demonstrated that the upfront cost of abemaciclib reduces the risk of a terminal breast cancer prognosis and its associated cost and quality of life impact. The addition of 2 years of abemaciclib provides an option for the treatment of HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abemaciclib in Combination with Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Davie, Sory Traoré, Waleed Badreldin, Astrid Torstensson, Esra Cakar, Anuja C McCullough, Susan Tempelaar, Elisabeth Fenwick, Peter S Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12325-025-03164-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The monarchE trial demonstrated that the addition of 2 years of abemaciclib to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduced the risk of disease recurrence in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), node-positive early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of disease recurrence. Abemaciclib meets a critical unmet need for more effective adjuvant therapy for this patient population. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness (CE) of abemaciclib plus ET compared to ET alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A five-state cohort transition model, which presents a United Kingdom (UK) perspective, is parameterized using data from the monarchE trial and literature. Cost-effectiveness results are presented in terms of cost/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over a lifetime time horizon. Various assumptions were tested through sensitivity and scenario analyses and uncertainty was assessed through probabilistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving abemaciclib plus ET were predicted to experience higher QALYs (11.16 compared to 10.42) at an increased cost (£87,541 compared to £48,625), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £52,317 per QALY gain compared to ET alone. The increased costs associated with the addition of abemaciclib were partially offset by a reduction in distant disease recurrence and associated costs. The scenario and sensitivity analyses supported robust base case results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the ICER exceeding usual willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels in the UK, a consequence of using list prices, the CE model utilizing the latest data cut from the monarchE trial, demonstrated that the upfront cost of abemaciclib reduces the risk of a terminal breast cancer prognosis and its associated cost and quality of life impact. The addition of 2 years of abemaciclib provides an option for the treatment of HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03164-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03164-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abemaciclib in Combination with Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer.
Introduction: The monarchE trial demonstrated that the addition of 2 years of abemaciclib to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) significantly reduced the risk of disease recurrence in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), node-positive early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of disease recurrence. Abemaciclib meets a critical unmet need for more effective adjuvant therapy for this patient population. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness (CE) of abemaciclib plus ET compared to ET alone.
Methods: A five-state cohort transition model, which presents a United Kingdom (UK) perspective, is parameterized using data from the monarchE trial and literature. Cost-effectiveness results are presented in terms of cost/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) over a lifetime time horizon. Various assumptions were tested through sensitivity and scenario analyses and uncertainty was assessed through probabilistic analysis.
Results: Patients receiving abemaciclib plus ET were predicted to experience higher QALYs (11.16 compared to 10.42) at an increased cost (£87,541 compared to £48,625), leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £52,317 per QALY gain compared to ET alone. The increased costs associated with the addition of abemaciclib were partially offset by a reduction in distant disease recurrence and associated costs. The scenario and sensitivity analyses supported robust base case results.
Conclusion: Despite the ICER exceeding usual willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels in the UK, a consequence of using list prices, the CE model utilizing the latest data cut from the monarchE trial, demonstrated that the upfront cost of abemaciclib reduces the risk of a terminal breast cancer prognosis and its associated cost and quality of life impact. The addition of 2 years of abemaciclib provides an option for the treatment of HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC.
期刊介绍：
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
