利用空间分布TOPMODEL评估英国集水区多种自然洪水管理技术的有效性

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Qiuyu Zhu, Megan Klaar, Thomas Willis, Joseph Holden
{"title":"利用空间分布TOPMODEL评估英国集水区多种自然洪水管理技术的有效性","authors":"Qiuyu Zhu,&nbsp;Megan Klaar,&nbsp;Thomas Willis,&nbsp;Joseph Holden","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While natural flood management (NFM) is becoming more widely used, there remains a lack of empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness. The primary uncertainties arise from two key aspects: first, the determination of NFM effectiveness is constrained by the relatively small catchment scales studied to date; second, the combination of multiple NFM interventions within a catchment may lead to flood peak synchronisation. In this study, both instream and terrestrial NFM interventions were modelled using a spatially distributed hydrological model, Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL (SD-TOPMODEL). To demonstrate how the scale and type of interventions interact to influence flood peaks, we integrated various NFM interventions and land cover changes, including woodland planting, soil aeration, floodplain restoration, and hedgerow planting. In comparison to previous versions of SD-TOPMODEL, we improved simulation efficiency to enable grid-based modelling of up to a 200-year return period flood event for an 81.4 km<sup>2</sup> catchment with 5 m resolution. Following extensive parameter calibration and validation, the model demonstrated stability and provided a reliable fit for flood peaks, achieving a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient of up to 0.93 between modelled and observed discharge. The results highlighted the effectiveness of NFM interventions in reducing flood peaks at the scale studied, particularly during single-peaked storm events and under dry pre-event catchment conditions. Moreover, the combined use of multiple interventions was more effective and resilient than single interventions, with flood peak reductions ranging from 4.2% to 16.0% in the study catchment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70122","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL to Assess the Effectiveness of Diverse Natural Flood Management Techniques in a UK Catchment\",\"authors\":\"Qiuyu Zhu,&nbsp;Megan Klaar,&nbsp;Thomas Willis,&nbsp;Joseph Holden\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While natural flood management (NFM) is becoming more widely used, there remains a lack of empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness. The primary uncertainties arise from two key aspects: first, the determination of NFM effectiveness is constrained by the relatively small catchment scales studied to date; second, the combination of multiple NFM interventions within a catchment may lead to flood peak synchronisation. In this study, both instream and terrestrial NFM interventions were modelled using a spatially distributed hydrological model, Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL (SD-TOPMODEL). To demonstrate how the scale and type of interventions interact to influence flood peaks, we integrated various NFM interventions and land cover changes, including woodland planting, soil aeration, floodplain restoration, and hedgerow planting. In comparison to previous versions of SD-TOPMODEL, we improved simulation efficiency to enable grid-based modelling of up to a 200-year return period flood event for an 81.4 km<sup>2</sup> catchment with 5 m resolution. Following extensive parameter calibration and validation, the model demonstrated stability and provided a reliable fit for flood peaks, achieving a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient of up to 0.93 between modelled and observed discharge. The results highlighted the effectiveness of NFM interventions in reducing flood peaks at the scale studied, particularly during single-peaked storm events and under dry pre-event catchment conditions. Moreover, the combined use of multiple interventions was more effective and resilient than single interventions, with flood peak reductions ranging from 4.2% to 16.0% in the study catchment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70122\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然自然洪水管理(NFM)正得到越来越广泛的应用,但其有效性仍然缺乏经验证据。主要的不确定性来自两个关键方面:首先,迄今为止研究的相对较小的流域规模限制了NFM有效性的确定;其次,集水区内多个NFM干预措施的组合可能导致洪峰同步。在本研究中,河流和陆地NFM干预都使用空间分布的水文模型,即空间分布TOPMODEL (SD-TOPMODEL)进行建模。为了证明干预措施的规模和类型如何相互作用以影响洪峰,我们综合了各种NFM干预措施和土地覆盖变化,包括林地种植、土壤通气性、洪泛区恢复和植物篱种植。与以前版本的SD-TOPMODEL相比,我们提高了模拟效率,能够以5米分辨率对81.4平方公里的流域进行长达200年的重现期洪水事件的网格建模。经过大量的参数校准和验证,该模型证明了稳定性,并提供了可靠的洪水峰值拟合,在模型和观测流量之间实现了纳什-苏特克利夫效率系数高达0.93。研究结果强调了NFM干预措施在研究范围内减少洪峰的有效性,特别是在单峰风暴事件和干旱的事件前集水区条件下。此外,多种干预措施的联合使用比单一干预措施更有效、更有弹性,研究流域的洪峰减少幅度从4.2%到16.0%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL to Assess the Effectiveness of Diverse Natural Flood Management Techniques in a UK Catchment

Use of Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL to Assess the Effectiveness of Diverse Natural Flood Management Techniques in a UK Catchment

While natural flood management (NFM) is becoming more widely used, there remains a lack of empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness. The primary uncertainties arise from two key aspects: first, the determination of NFM effectiveness is constrained by the relatively small catchment scales studied to date; second, the combination of multiple NFM interventions within a catchment may lead to flood peak synchronisation. In this study, both instream and terrestrial NFM interventions were modelled using a spatially distributed hydrological model, Spatially Distributed TOPMODEL (SD-TOPMODEL). To demonstrate how the scale and type of interventions interact to influence flood peaks, we integrated various NFM interventions and land cover changes, including woodland planting, soil aeration, floodplain restoration, and hedgerow planting. In comparison to previous versions of SD-TOPMODEL, we improved simulation efficiency to enable grid-based modelling of up to a 200-year return period flood event for an 81.4 km2 catchment with 5 m resolution. Following extensive parameter calibration and validation, the model demonstrated stability and provided a reliable fit for flood peaks, achieving a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient of up to 0.93 between modelled and observed discharge. The results highlighted the effectiveness of NFM interventions in reducing flood peaks at the scale studied, particularly during single-peaked storm events and under dry pre-event catchment conditions. Moreover, the combined use of multiple interventions was more effective and resilient than single interventions, with flood peak reductions ranging from 4.2% to 16.0% in the study catchment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信