工业规模下硬化剂类型对刨花板性能的影响

IF 0.8 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
O. Çamlıbel, M. Aydın, E. Koç
{"title":"工业规模下硬化剂类型对刨花板性能的影响","authors":"O. Çamlıbel,&nbsp;M. Aydın,&nbsp;E. Koç","doi":"10.1007/s40010-025-00910-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Influence of the two different hardeners (ammonium chloride NH<sub>4</sub>Cl and ammonium sulphate (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) on the physical (density, thickness, moisture content, thickness swelling and water absorption) and mechanical (modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity, surface soundness and internal bonding strength) properties and formaldehyde emission of the particleboard was figured out. Boards were industrially produced (at continuous press line) using urea formaldehyde resin, liquid paraffin, and a 50:40:10 mixture of Scots pine, oak and poplar chips, respectively. Except for elasticity, boards produced using ammonium chloride had better mechanical properties, but their thickness swelling and water absorption capabilities were lower (approx. 55.5% and 45.9%, respectively) than those produced with ammonium sulphate. Utilization of ammonium chloride provided 30.3% higher surface soundness. There were less than 1% differences in the thickness and density. Around 36.4% less formaldehyde emission was determined for ammonium chloride-modified boards. According to the results, only means of IB did not present statistically significant differences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":744,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences","volume":"95 1","pages":"33 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Hardener Type on the Particleboard Properties at Industrial Scale\",\"authors\":\"O. Çamlıbel,&nbsp;M. Aydın,&nbsp;E. Koç\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40010-025-00910-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Influence of the two different hardeners (ammonium chloride NH<sub>4</sub>Cl and ammonium sulphate (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) on the physical (density, thickness, moisture content, thickness swelling and water absorption) and mechanical (modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity, surface soundness and internal bonding strength) properties and formaldehyde emission of the particleboard was figured out. Boards were industrially produced (at continuous press line) using urea formaldehyde resin, liquid paraffin, and a 50:40:10 mixture of Scots pine, oak and poplar chips, respectively. Except for elasticity, boards produced using ammonium chloride had better mechanical properties, but their thickness swelling and water absorption capabilities were lower (approx. 55.5% and 45.9%, respectively) than those produced with ammonium sulphate. Utilization of ammonium chloride provided 30.3% higher surface soundness. There were less than 1% differences in the thickness and density. Around 36.4% less formaldehyde emission was determined for ammonium chloride-modified boards. According to the results, only means of IB did not present statistically significant differences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40010-025-00910-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40010-025-00910-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了两种不同的硬化剂(氯化铵NH4Cl和硫酸铵(NH4)2SO4)对刨花板的物理性能(密度、厚度、含水率、厚度膨胀率和吸水性)和力学性能(断裂模量、弹性模量、表面完好度和内部粘接强度)及甲醛释放量的影响。板材的工业化生产(在连续压生产线上)分别使用尿素甲醛树脂、液体石蜡和50:40:10的苏格兰松、橡树和杨木碎片混合物。除弹性外,使用氯化铵生产的板材具有较好的力学性能,但其厚度膨胀和吸水能力较低(约为。分别为55.5%和45.9%)。使用氯化铵后,表面完好度提高30.3%。厚度和密度的差异小于1%。氯化铵改性板材的甲醛释放量减少了36.4%左右。结果显示,仅IB平均值无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Hardener Type on the Particleboard Properties at Industrial Scale

Influence of the two different hardeners (ammonium chloride NH4Cl and ammonium sulphate (NH4)2SO4) on the physical (density, thickness, moisture content, thickness swelling and water absorption) and mechanical (modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity, surface soundness and internal bonding strength) properties and formaldehyde emission of the particleboard was figured out. Boards were industrially produced (at continuous press line) using urea formaldehyde resin, liquid paraffin, and a 50:40:10 mixture of Scots pine, oak and poplar chips, respectively. Except for elasticity, boards produced using ammonium chloride had better mechanical properties, but their thickness swelling and water absorption capabilities were lower (approx. 55.5% and 45.9%, respectively) than those produced with ammonium sulphate. Utilization of ammonium chloride provided 30.3% higher surface soundness. There were less than 1% differences in the thickness and density. Around 36.4% less formaldehyde emission was determined for ammonium chloride-modified boards. According to the results, only means of IB did not present statistically significant differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: To promote research in all the branches of Science & Technology; and disseminate the knowledge and advancements in Science & Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信