考虑各种迟滞模型的地震动持续时间对恒延性响应谱的影响

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yinan Zhao , Maosheng Gong , Zhanxuan Zuo , Jia Jia , Qinghui Lai
{"title":"考虑各种迟滞模型的地震动持续时间对恒延性响应谱的影响","authors":"Yinan Zhao ,&nbsp;Maosheng Gong ,&nbsp;Zhanxuan Zuo ,&nbsp;Jia Jia ,&nbsp;Qinghui Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Currently, there is extensive research on the influence of duration on structures, but most of these studies focus on specific structures or components. The conclusions of different scholars are not uniform, particularly in quantitatively assessing the influence of duration on structures. To address this issue, the duration effect from the perspective of response spectra was discussed in this study. Firstly, we matched 100 pairs of long- and short-duration ground motions, then input them into three SDOF systems of the modified Clough, strength and stiffness-degrading, and pinching-degrading models to calculate damage measures including acceleration, displacement, input energy, hysteretic energy, and damage index. Constant ductility response spectra and their spectral ratios containing these five damage measures are generated, and the differences in the spectra and spectral ratios of long- and short-duration ground motions are analyzed. Lastly, we also discussed the correlation between duration and the damage measures of various hysteretic models. The results show that duration has almost no effect on the acceleration and displacement, but the input energy, hysteresis energy, and damage index under long-duration motions can be as high as 1.5 to 3.0 times those of short-duration motions, especially for short-period structures where the duration effect is more significant than for long-period ones. Additionally, the duration effect varies across structures with different constitutive models. The findings of this study can provide references for future seismic design methods that consider the influence of duration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 109433"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of ground-motion duration on constant ductility response spectra considering various hysteretic models\",\"authors\":\"Yinan Zhao ,&nbsp;Maosheng Gong ,&nbsp;Zhanxuan Zuo ,&nbsp;Jia Jia ,&nbsp;Qinghui Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Currently, there is extensive research on the influence of duration on structures, but most of these studies focus on specific structures or components. The conclusions of different scholars are not uniform, particularly in quantitatively assessing the influence of duration on structures. To address this issue, the duration effect from the perspective of response spectra was discussed in this study. Firstly, we matched 100 pairs of long- and short-duration ground motions, then input them into three SDOF systems of the modified Clough, strength and stiffness-degrading, and pinching-degrading models to calculate damage measures including acceleration, displacement, input energy, hysteretic energy, and damage index. Constant ductility response spectra and their spectral ratios containing these five damage measures are generated, and the differences in the spectra and spectral ratios of long- and short-duration ground motions are analyzed. Lastly, we also discussed the correlation between duration and the damage measures of various hysteretic models. The results show that duration has almost no effect on the acceleration and displacement, but the input energy, hysteresis energy, and damage index under long-duration motions can be as high as 1.5 to 3.0 times those of short-duration motions, especially for short-period structures where the duration effect is more significant than for long-period ones. Additionally, the duration effect varies across structures with different constitutive models. The findings of this study can provide references for future seismic design methods that consider the influence of duration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026772612500226X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026772612500226X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,关于持续时间对结构影响的研究非常广泛,但这些研究大多集中在特定的结构或构件上。不同学者的结论并不统一,特别是在对持续时间对结构影响的定量评估方面。为了解决这一问题,本研究从反应谱的角度探讨了持续时间效应。首先将100对长、短时地震动进行匹配,然后将其输入到改进的Clough模型、强度刚度退化模型和挤压退化模型3个SDOF系统中,计算加速度、位移、输入能量、滞回能量和损伤指数等损伤测度。生成了包含这五种损伤措施的恒延性响应谱及其谱比,并分析了长、短持续时地震动谱和谱比的差异。最后,讨论了各种迟滞模型的持续时间与损伤测度之间的关系。结果表明,持续时间对加速度和位移几乎没有影响,但长时运动下的输入能量、滞回能量和损伤指数可高达短时运动的1.5 ~ 3.0倍,特别是短时运动对结构的持续时间影响比长时运动更为显著。此外,在不同的本构模型下,持续时间效应在结构之间也存在差异。研究结果可为今后考虑持续时间影响的抗震设计方法提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of ground-motion duration on constant ductility response spectra considering various hysteretic models
Currently, there is extensive research on the influence of duration on structures, but most of these studies focus on specific structures or components. The conclusions of different scholars are not uniform, particularly in quantitatively assessing the influence of duration on structures. To address this issue, the duration effect from the perspective of response spectra was discussed in this study. Firstly, we matched 100 pairs of long- and short-duration ground motions, then input them into three SDOF systems of the modified Clough, strength and stiffness-degrading, and pinching-degrading models to calculate damage measures including acceleration, displacement, input energy, hysteretic energy, and damage index. Constant ductility response spectra and their spectral ratios containing these five damage measures are generated, and the differences in the spectra and spectral ratios of long- and short-duration ground motions are analyzed. Lastly, we also discussed the correlation between duration and the damage measures of various hysteretic models. The results show that duration has almost no effect on the acceleration and displacement, but the input energy, hysteresis energy, and damage index under long-duration motions can be as high as 1.5 to 3.0 times those of short-duration motions, especially for short-period structures where the duration effect is more significant than for long-period ones. Additionally, the duration effect varies across structures with different constitutive models. The findings of this study can provide references for future seismic design methods that consider the influence of duration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信