{"title":"食品贸易政策变化的贸易和福利效应:来自中国对澳大利亚大麦反倾销和反补贴措施的证据","authors":"Jijun Yang , Weiwei Ai , Wenxiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food imports play an important role in ensuring overall food security. This paper provides a dynamic assessment of the trade and welfare effects of China's anti-dumping and countervailing (“double reverse”) tariffs on Australian barley. Using a difference-in-differences approach and a partial equilibrium model, we find that trade destruction effects—marked by a significant drop in Australian barley exports to China—greatly outweigh trade diversion effects, with distinct outcomes across the investigation, execution, and termination phases. Although these measures offer short-term protection for Chinese barley producers, they result in a net welfare loss for China due to reduced consumer welfare. Australia also incurs a net welfare loss from decreased producer surplus and lower domestic prices. In contrast, third countries benefit from expanded access to China's barley market and a redirection of Australian barley exports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102405"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade and welfare effects of food trade policy changes: Evidence from China's anti-dumping and countervailing measures on Australian barley\",\"authors\":\"Jijun Yang , Weiwei Ai , Wenxiao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Food imports play an important role in ensuring overall food security. This paper provides a dynamic assessment of the trade and welfare effects of China's anti-dumping and countervailing (“double reverse”) tariffs on Australian barley. Using a difference-in-differences approach and a partial equilibrium model, we find that trade destruction effects—marked by a significant drop in Australian barley exports to China—greatly outweigh trade diversion effects, with distinct outcomes across the investigation, execution, and termination phases. Although these measures offer short-term protection for Chinese barley producers, they result in a net welfare loss for China due to reduced consumer welfare. Australia also incurs a net welfare loss from decreased producer surplus and lower domestic prices. In contrast, third countries benefit from expanded access to China's barley market and a redirection of Australian barley exports.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X2500063X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X2500063X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trade and welfare effects of food trade policy changes: Evidence from China's anti-dumping and countervailing measures on Australian barley
Food imports play an important role in ensuring overall food security. This paper provides a dynamic assessment of the trade and welfare effects of China's anti-dumping and countervailing (“double reverse”) tariffs on Australian barley. Using a difference-in-differences approach and a partial equilibrium model, we find that trade destruction effects—marked by a significant drop in Australian barley exports to China—greatly outweigh trade diversion effects, with distinct outcomes across the investigation, execution, and termination phases. Although these measures offer short-term protection for Chinese barley producers, they result in a net welfare loss for China due to reduced consumer welfare. Australia also incurs a net welfare loss from decreased producer surplus and lower domestic prices. In contrast, third countries benefit from expanded access to China's barley market and a redirection of Australian barley exports.
期刊介绍:
The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.