Hans Rund , Rainer Kurmayer , Stefanie Dobrovolny , Martin Luger , Josef Wanzenböck
{"title":"eDNA元条形码技术在近高寒湖泊淡水鱼空间分布及生境利用评价中的应用","authors":"Hans Rund , Rainer Kurmayer , Stefanie Dobrovolny , Martin Luger , Josef Wanzenböck","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of metabarcoding for fish eDNA analysis has been successfully implemented in a multitude of aquatic environments. While spatial distribution of fish eDNA in lentic systems has gained increasing attention recently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal sampling strategies to assess the spatial distribution of fish eDNA in deep, <em>peri</em>-alpine lakes. Water samples (n = 84) were collected from Lake Mondsee (Upper Austria, Austria) using different sampling strategies, targeting fish eDNA distribution patterns with high spatial resolution. Thus, three different eDNA sampling strategies were applied at former traditional sampling sites: (i) point sampling in the littoral, profundal and tributary mouths; (ii) depth-integrated sampling in the pelagic zone; and (iii) horizontally-integrated sampling along shoreline (littoral) transects. Metabarcoding of 12S rDNA was used to identify differences in species composition across the littoral, profundal, pelagic zone, and tributary mouths. Moreover, all samples were analyzed regarding total fish DNA concentration (via qPCR) to determine variability among different lake habitats. Observed spatial eDNA distribution patterns aligned with habitat preferences of most fish species and revealed significant differences in species composition and detection across habitats and depth layers. Furthermore, we found that a relatively small number (n = 13) of horizontally-integrated samples was sufficient for a comprehensive fish biodiversity assessment. This study will help to optimize sampling strategies in lake systems and improve ecological status assessments based on metabarcoding data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113459"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of eDNA metabarcoding to assess spatial distribution and habitat use by freshwater fish in a peri-alpine lake\",\"authors\":\"Hans Rund , Rainer Kurmayer , Stefanie Dobrovolny , Martin Luger , Josef Wanzenböck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The application of metabarcoding for fish eDNA analysis has been successfully implemented in a multitude of aquatic environments. While spatial distribution of fish eDNA in lentic systems has gained increasing attention recently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal sampling strategies to assess the spatial distribution of fish eDNA in deep, <em>peri</em>-alpine lakes. Water samples (n = 84) were collected from Lake Mondsee (Upper Austria, Austria) using different sampling strategies, targeting fish eDNA distribution patterns with high spatial resolution. Thus, three different eDNA sampling strategies were applied at former traditional sampling sites: (i) point sampling in the littoral, profundal and tributary mouths; (ii) depth-integrated sampling in the pelagic zone; and (iii) horizontally-integrated sampling along shoreline (littoral) transects. Metabarcoding of 12S rDNA was used to identify differences in species composition across the littoral, profundal, pelagic zone, and tributary mouths. Moreover, all samples were analyzed regarding total fish DNA concentration (via qPCR) to determine variability among different lake habitats. Observed spatial eDNA distribution patterns aligned with habitat preferences of most fish species and revealed significant differences in species composition and detection across habitats and depth layers. Furthermore, we found that a relatively small number (n = 13) of horizontally-integrated samples was sufficient for a comprehensive fish biodiversity assessment. This study will help to optimize sampling strategies in lake systems and improve ecological status assessments based on metabarcoding data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003899\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of eDNA metabarcoding to assess spatial distribution and habitat use by freshwater fish in a peri-alpine lake
The application of metabarcoding for fish eDNA analysis has been successfully implemented in a multitude of aquatic environments. While spatial distribution of fish eDNA in lentic systems has gained increasing attention recently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal sampling strategies to assess the spatial distribution of fish eDNA in deep, peri-alpine lakes. Water samples (n = 84) were collected from Lake Mondsee (Upper Austria, Austria) using different sampling strategies, targeting fish eDNA distribution patterns with high spatial resolution. Thus, three different eDNA sampling strategies were applied at former traditional sampling sites: (i) point sampling in the littoral, profundal and tributary mouths; (ii) depth-integrated sampling in the pelagic zone; and (iii) horizontally-integrated sampling along shoreline (littoral) transects. Metabarcoding of 12S rDNA was used to identify differences in species composition across the littoral, profundal, pelagic zone, and tributary mouths. Moreover, all samples were analyzed regarding total fish DNA concentration (via qPCR) to determine variability among different lake habitats. Observed spatial eDNA distribution patterns aligned with habitat preferences of most fish species and revealed significant differences in species composition and detection across habitats and depth layers. Furthermore, we found that a relatively small number (n = 13) of horizontally-integrated samples was sufficient for a comprehensive fish biodiversity assessment. This study will help to optimize sampling strategies in lake systems and improve ecological status assessments based on metabarcoding data.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.