eDNA元条形码技术在近高寒湖泊淡水鱼空间分布及生境利用评价中的应用

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hans Rund , Rainer Kurmayer , Stefanie Dobrovolny , Martin Luger , Josef Wanzenböck
{"title":"eDNA元条形码技术在近高寒湖泊淡水鱼空间分布及生境利用评价中的应用","authors":"Hans Rund ,&nbsp;Rainer Kurmayer ,&nbsp;Stefanie Dobrovolny ,&nbsp;Martin Luger ,&nbsp;Josef Wanzenböck","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of metabarcoding for fish eDNA analysis has been successfully implemented in a multitude of aquatic environments. While spatial distribution of fish eDNA in lentic systems has gained increasing attention recently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal sampling strategies to assess the spatial distribution of fish eDNA in deep, <em>peri</em>-alpine lakes. Water samples (n = 84) were collected from Lake Mondsee (Upper Austria, Austria) using different sampling strategies, targeting fish eDNA distribution patterns with high spatial resolution. Thus, three different eDNA sampling strategies were applied at former traditional sampling sites: (i) point sampling in the littoral, profundal and tributary mouths; (ii) depth-integrated sampling in the pelagic zone; and (iii) horizontally-integrated sampling along shoreline (littoral) transects. Metabarcoding of 12S rDNA was used to identify differences in species composition across the littoral, profundal, pelagic zone, and tributary mouths. Moreover, all samples were analyzed regarding total fish DNA concentration (via qPCR) to determine variability among different lake habitats. Observed spatial eDNA distribution patterns aligned with habitat preferences of most fish species and revealed significant differences in species composition and detection across habitats and depth layers. Furthermore, we found that a relatively small number (n = 13) of horizontally-integrated samples was sufficient for a comprehensive fish biodiversity assessment. This study will help to optimize sampling strategies in lake systems and improve ecological status assessments based on metabarcoding data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113459"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of eDNA metabarcoding to assess spatial distribution and habitat use by freshwater fish in a peri-alpine lake\",\"authors\":\"Hans Rund ,&nbsp;Rainer Kurmayer ,&nbsp;Stefanie Dobrovolny ,&nbsp;Martin Luger ,&nbsp;Josef Wanzenböck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The application of metabarcoding for fish eDNA analysis has been successfully implemented in a multitude of aquatic environments. While spatial distribution of fish eDNA in lentic systems has gained increasing attention recently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal sampling strategies to assess the spatial distribution of fish eDNA in deep, <em>peri</em>-alpine lakes. Water samples (n = 84) were collected from Lake Mondsee (Upper Austria, Austria) using different sampling strategies, targeting fish eDNA distribution patterns with high spatial resolution. Thus, three different eDNA sampling strategies were applied at former traditional sampling sites: (i) point sampling in the littoral, profundal and tributary mouths; (ii) depth-integrated sampling in the pelagic zone; and (iii) horizontally-integrated sampling along shoreline (littoral) transects. Metabarcoding of 12S rDNA was used to identify differences in species composition across the littoral, profundal, pelagic zone, and tributary mouths. Moreover, all samples were analyzed regarding total fish DNA concentration (via qPCR) to determine variability among different lake habitats. Observed spatial eDNA distribution patterns aligned with habitat preferences of most fish species and revealed significant differences in species composition and detection across habitats and depth layers. Furthermore, we found that a relatively small number (n = 13) of horizontally-integrated samples was sufficient for a comprehensive fish biodiversity assessment. This study will help to optimize sampling strategies in lake systems and improve ecological status assessments based on metabarcoding data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003899\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

元条形码技术在鱼类eDNA分析中的应用已经在多种水生环境中成功实现。虽然鱼类eDNA在湖泊系统中的空间分布近年来受到越来越多的关注,但关于评估深高山湖泊中鱼类eDNA空间分布的最佳采样策略存在知识缺口。采用不同的采样策略从奥地利上奥地利的Mondsee湖采集水样(n = 84),以高空间分辨率定位鱼类eDNA分布模式。因此,在以前的传统采样地点采用了三种不同的eDNA采样策略:(i)在沿海、深海和支流口进行点采样;(ii)深海区的深度综合取样;(iii)沿岸线(沿岸)样带进行水平综合采样。通过对12S rDNA的元条形码分析,确定了沿岸、深海、远洋和支流河口的物种组成差异。此外,通过qPCR分析了所有样本的总DNA浓度,以确定不同湖泊栖息地之间的差异。观察到的eDNA空间分布格局与大多数鱼类的栖息地偏好一致,并揭示了物种组成和探测在不同栖息地和深度层上的显著差异。此外,我们发现相对较少的水平整合样本(n = 13)足以进行全面的鱼类生物多样性评估。该研究将有助于优化湖泊系统采样策略,完善基于元条形码数据的生态状况评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Application of eDNA metabarcoding to assess spatial distribution and habitat use by freshwater fish in a peri-alpine lake

Application of eDNA metabarcoding to assess spatial distribution and habitat use by freshwater fish in a peri-alpine lake
The application of metabarcoding for fish eDNA analysis has been successfully implemented in a multitude of aquatic environments. While spatial distribution of fish eDNA in lentic systems has gained increasing attention recently, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal sampling strategies to assess the spatial distribution of fish eDNA in deep, peri-alpine lakes. Water samples (n = 84) were collected from Lake Mondsee (Upper Austria, Austria) using different sampling strategies, targeting fish eDNA distribution patterns with high spatial resolution. Thus, three different eDNA sampling strategies were applied at former traditional sampling sites: (i) point sampling in the littoral, profundal and tributary mouths; (ii) depth-integrated sampling in the pelagic zone; and (iii) horizontally-integrated sampling along shoreline (littoral) transects. Metabarcoding of 12S rDNA was used to identify differences in species composition across the littoral, profundal, pelagic zone, and tributary mouths. Moreover, all samples were analyzed regarding total fish DNA concentration (via qPCR) to determine variability among different lake habitats. Observed spatial eDNA distribution patterns aligned with habitat preferences of most fish species and revealed significant differences in species composition and detection across habitats and depth layers. Furthermore, we found that a relatively small number (n = 13) of horizontally-integrated samples was sufficient for a comprehensive fish biodiversity assessment. This study will help to optimize sampling strategies in lake systems and improve ecological status assessments based on metabarcoding data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信