{"title":"水文介导的资源可得性调节了沿海沼泽每年的涉禽繁殖","authors":"David A. Essian , Nathan J. Dorn , Dale E. Gawlik","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Resource density, timing, duration, and accessibility can strongly affect the reproductive responses of consumers. For applied models of resource availability to be most useful, they must account for spatiotemporal variation in each of these factors. Here, we developed a foraging habitat model for wading birds (Ardeidae, Ciconiidae, and Threskiornithidae) in an extensive (>400 km<sup>2</sup>) fringe wetland in a shallow subtropical lake (Lake Okeechobee, Florida, USA). Our model accounts for hydrological processes that influence wading bird prey resource density, and area and timing of habitat accessibility. The resulting spatiotemporally dynamic model estimates resource availability for wading birds at a local scale (30.5-m grid cells). We assessed whether our model could explain wading bird productivity by hindcasting estimates over fourteen nesting seasons (2006–2019) and quantifying the relationship between aggregated measures of resource availability and breeding productivity (nest abundance and nest survival) for four wading bird species. We found that hydropatterns that increase fish productivity and concentrate fish biomass over hierarchically nested spatiotemporal scales regulate resource availability for wading birds. Wading bird nest abundance increased with the number of available-habitat-days for feeding in the wetland during the breeding season. Furthermore, nest survival for two of three wading bird species increased with available-habitat-days within the foraging range of a nest. Overall, we found that more birds nested with greater success when our models indicated the continual appearance of new foraging habitat throughout the nesting season. The results of this study indicate that managing wetlands for waterbirds will require water management regimes that prioritize hydrological processes that are linked over multiple spatiotemporal scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113414"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrologically-mediated resource availability regulates annual wading bird breeding in a littoral marsh\",\"authors\":\"David A. Essian , Nathan J. Dorn , Dale E. Gawlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Resource density, timing, duration, and accessibility can strongly affect the reproductive responses of consumers. For applied models of resource availability to be most useful, they must account for spatiotemporal variation in each of these factors. Here, we developed a foraging habitat model for wading birds (Ardeidae, Ciconiidae, and Threskiornithidae) in an extensive (>400 km<sup>2</sup>) fringe wetland in a shallow subtropical lake (Lake Okeechobee, Florida, USA). Our model accounts for hydrological processes that influence wading bird prey resource density, and area and timing of habitat accessibility. The resulting spatiotemporally dynamic model estimates resource availability for wading birds at a local scale (30.5-m grid cells). We assessed whether our model could explain wading bird productivity by hindcasting estimates over fourteen nesting seasons (2006–2019) and quantifying the relationship between aggregated measures of resource availability and breeding productivity (nest abundance and nest survival) for four wading bird species. We found that hydropatterns that increase fish productivity and concentrate fish biomass over hierarchically nested spatiotemporal scales regulate resource availability for wading birds. Wading bird nest abundance increased with the number of available-habitat-days for feeding in the wetland during the breeding season. Furthermore, nest survival for two of three wading bird species increased with available-habitat-days within the foraging range of a nest. Overall, we found that more birds nested with greater success when our models indicated the continual appearance of new foraging habitat throughout the nesting season. The results of this study indicate that managing wetlands for waterbirds will require water management regimes that prioritize hydrological processes that are linked over multiple spatiotemporal scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003449\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hydrologically-mediated resource availability regulates annual wading bird breeding in a littoral marsh
Resource density, timing, duration, and accessibility can strongly affect the reproductive responses of consumers. For applied models of resource availability to be most useful, they must account for spatiotemporal variation in each of these factors. Here, we developed a foraging habitat model for wading birds (Ardeidae, Ciconiidae, and Threskiornithidae) in an extensive (>400 km2) fringe wetland in a shallow subtropical lake (Lake Okeechobee, Florida, USA). Our model accounts for hydrological processes that influence wading bird prey resource density, and area and timing of habitat accessibility. The resulting spatiotemporally dynamic model estimates resource availability for wading birds at a local scale (30.5-m grid cells). We assessed whether our model could explain wading bird productivity by hindcasting estimates over fourteen nesting seasons (2006–2019) and quantifying the relationship between aggregated measures of resource availability and breeding productivity (nest abundance and nest survival) for four wading bird species. We found that hydropatterns that increase fish productivity and concentrate fish biomass over hierarchically nested spatiotemporal scales regulate resource availability for wading birds. Wading bird nest abundance increased with the number of available-habitat-days for feeding in the wetland during the breeding season. Furthermore, nest survival for two of three wading bird species increased with available-habitat-days within the foraging range of a nest. Overall, we found that more birds nested with greater success when our models indicated the continual appearance of new foraging habitat throughout the nesting season. The results of this study indicate that managing wetlands for waterbirds will require water management regimes that prioritize hydrological processes that are linked over multiple spatiotemporal scales.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.