{"title":"城市景观破碎化的驱动因素:局部贡献、空间关系和因果效应","authors":"Simin Jiang , Fei Feng , Xinna Zhang , Chengyang Xu , Baoquan Jia , Raffaele Lafortezza","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization significantly alters landscape patterns, leading to fragmentation with implications for biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human well-being. Understanding the drivers of fragmentation is crucial for developing sustainable urban planning strategies. This study investigates the spatial patterns and driving mechanisms of landscape fragmentation in Nanchang, China, a rapidly urbanizing city. We analyze landscape fragmentation patterns for 2000, 2010, and 2022 and assess the influence of nine natural and anthropogenic factors using a geographically weighted random forest (GWRF) model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity in landscape fragmentation, with high-fragmentation hotspots concentrated in the southeastern and central regions. The intensity of land cover change and human activity emerge as the dominant human factors influencing fragmentation, exhibiting strong spatial correlations and causal effects. land cover change intensity and human activity intensity account for 44.58 % and 34.78 % of the highest ranking local feature importance, respectively. The human footprint also demonstrates a statistically significant positive spatial correlation with fragmentation (mean Moran’s I = 0.5304). Furthermore, land cover change intensity exerts a direct positive influence on landscape fragmentation, as indicated by an average standardized path coefficient of 0.41. Slope and human footprint also play important roles, primarily through indirect effects (mean value above 0.3 and 0.35, respectively). The influence of impervious surface expansion intensity showed an inverted “U” shape over time in spatial correlation and causal effect, suggesting that while initial urban expansion increases fragmentation, advanced urbanization and green space restoration can mitigate these effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 113454"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving factors of fragmentation in urban landscapes: Local contributions, spatial relationships, and causal effects\",\"authors\":\"Simin Jiang , Fei Feng , Xinna Zhang , Chengyang Xu , Baoquan Jia , Raffaele Lafortezza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rapid urbanization significantly alters landscape patterns, leading to fragmentation with implications for biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human well-being. Understanding the drivers of fragmentation is crucial for developing sustainable urban planning strategies. This study investigates the spatial patterns and driving mechanisms of landscape fragmentation in Nanchang, China, a rapidly urbanizing city. We analyze landscape fragmentation patterns for 2000, 2010, and 2022 and assess the influence of nine natural and anthropogenic factors using a geographically weighted random forest (GWRF) model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity in landscape fragmentation, with high-fragmentation hotspots concentrated in the southeastern and central regions. The intensity of land cover change and human activity emerge as the dominant human factors influencing fragmentation, exhibiting strong spatial correlations and causal effects. land cover change intensity and human activity intensity account for 44.58 % and 34.78 % of the highest ranking local feature importance, respectively. The human footprint also demonstrates a statistically significant positive spatial correlation with fragmentation (mean Moran’s I = 0.5304). Furthermore, land cover change intensity exerts a direct positive influence on landscape fragmentation, as indicated by an average standardized path coefficient of 0.41. Slope and human footprint also play important roles, primarily through indirect effects (mean value above 0.3 and 0.35, respectively). The influence of impervious surface expansion intensity showed an inverted “U” shape over time in spatial correlation and causal effect, suggesting that while initial urban expansion increases fragmentation, advanced urbanization and green space restoration can mitigate these effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"174 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500384X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2500384X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Driving factors of fragmentation in urban landscapes: Local contributions, spatial relationships, and causal effects
Rapid urbanization significantly alters landscape patterns, leading to fragmentation with implications for biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human well-being. Understanding the drivers of fragmentation is crucial for developing sustainable urban planning strategies. This study investigates the spatial patterns and driving mechanisms of landscape fragmentation in Nanchang, China, a rapidly urbanizing city. We analyze landscape fragmentation patterns for 2000, 2010, and 2022 and assess the influence of nine natural and anthropogenic factors using a geographically weighted random forest (GWRF) model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Our results reveal significant spatial heterogeneity in landscape fragmentation, with high-fragmentation hotspots concentrated in the southeastern and central regions. The intensity of land cover change and human activity emerge as the dominant human factors influencing fragmentation, exhibiting strong spatial correlations and causal effects. land cover change intensity and human activity intensity account for 44.58 % and 34.78 % of the highest ranking local feature importance, respectively. The human footprint also demonstrates a statistically significant positive spatial correlation with fragmentation (mean Moran’s I = 0.5304). Furthermore, land cover change intensity exerts a direct positive influence on landscape fragmentation, as indicated by an average standardized path coefficient of 0.41. Slope and human footprint also play important roles, primarily through indirect effects (mean value above 0.3 and 0.35, respectively). The influence of impervious surface expansion intensity showed an inverted “U” shape over time in spatial correlation and causal effect, suggesting that while initial urban expansion increases fragmentation, advanced urbanization and green space restoration can mitigate these effects.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.