个体特异性弹性和补偿个性化框架的对比:反刍的案例

IF 4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Sigal Zilcha-Mano
{"title":"个体特异性弹性和补偿个性化框架的对比:反刍的案例","authors":"Sigal Zilcha-Mano","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rumination has been identified as a potential mechanism of therapeutic change, particularly in directive and focused psychotherapies for depression. Previous research has predominantly focused on either trait-like individual differences or state-like changes in rumination without integrating these aspects. In the current study, we propose a computational approach to investigating whether rumination serves as a compensatory or a resilience mechanism by integrating trait-like and state-like effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Rumination and depressive symptoms were assessed (in <em>N</em> = 100) pretreatment and repeatedly throughout treatment. Mixed-level models were used to examine whether pretreatment trait-like rumination interacted with a time-variant variable of in-treatment state-like changes in rumination to predict subsequent changes in treatment outcomes. These models were used to determine whether individuals with higher or lower pretreatment trait-like levels of rumination benefited more from state-like reductions in rumination, thus contrasting the compensatory and resilience theoretical frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>As hypothesized, the findings supported the compensatory framework; individuals with higher pretreatment trait-like levels of rumination benefited most from greater state-like reductions in rumination during treatment, as evidenced by greater subsequent symptom reduction (<em>p</em> = .04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings refine our understanding of rumination as an individual-specific mechanism of therapeutic change, dependent on an individual’s trait-like levels of rumination. The proposed computational approach enabled an empirical comparison of the 2 main theoretical frameworks of treatment personalization, compensatory and resilience, offering new insights into mechanisms that drive therapeutic change. Future studies could leverage the paradigm proposed here to examine for which patients and in what contexts mechanisms of change function as compensatory versus resilience mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100478"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasting Individual-Specific Resilience and Compensation Personalization Frameworks: The Case of Rumination\",\"authors\":\"Sigal Zilcha-Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Rumination has been identified as a potential mechanism of therapeutic change, particularly in directive and focused psychotherapies for depression. Previous research has predominantly focused on either trait-like individual differences or state-like changes in rumination without integrating these aspects. In the current study, we propose a computational approach to investigating whether rumination serves as a compensatory or a resilience mechanism by integrating trait-like and state-like effects.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Rumination and depressive symptoms were assessed (in <em>N</em> = 100) pretreatment and repeatedly throughout treatment. Mixed-level models were used to examine whether pretreatment trait-like rumination interacted with a time-variant variable of in-treatment state-like changes in rumination to predict subsequent changes in treatment outcomes. These models were used to determine whether individuals with higher or lower pretreatment trait-like levels of rumination benefited more from state-like reductions in rumination, thus contrasting the compensatory and resilience theoretical frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>As hypothesized, the findings supported the compensatory framework; individuals with higher pretreatment trait-like levels of rumination benefited most from greater state-like reductions in rumination during treatment, as evidenced by greater subsequent symptom reduction (<em>p</em> = .04).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings refine our understanding of rumination as an individual-specific mechanism of therapeutic change, dependent on an individual’s trait-like levels of rumination. The proposed computational approach enabled an empirical comparison of the 2 main theoretical frameworks of treatment personalization, compensatory and resilience, offering new insights into mechanisms that drive therapeutic change. Future studies could leverage the paradigm proposed here to examine for which patients and in what contexts mechanisms of change function as compensatory versus resilience mechanisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological psychiatry global open science\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological psychiatry global open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325000321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼓声已被认为是一种潜在的治疗改变机制,特别是在抑郁症的指导和集中心理治疗中。以前的研究主要集中在反刍的个体特征差异或状态变化上,而没有整合这些方面。在当前的研究中,我们提出了一种计算方法,通过整合特质和状态效应来研究反刍是作为一种补偿机制还是一种恢复机制。方法在治疗前和整个治疗过程中反复评估反刍和抑郁症状(N = 100)。混合水平模型用于检验预处理特质样反刍是否与治疗状态样反刍变化的时变变量相互作用,以预测随后治疗结果的变化。这些模型用于确定具有较高或较低预处理特质样反刍水平的个体是否从反刍状态样减少中获益更多,从而对比补偿和弹性理论框架。结果如假设的那样,研究结果支持代偿框架;具有较高预处理特质样反刍水平的个体在治疗期间反刍状态样减少中获益最多,正如随后症状减轻所证明的那样(p = .04)。结论:这些发现完善了我们对反刍的理解,认为它是一种个体特异性的治疗改变机制,依赖于个体的反刍特质水平。提出的计算方法能够对治疗个性化、代偿性和弹性这两种主要理论框架进行实证比较,为推动治疗变化的机制提供新的见解。未来的研究可以利用这里提出的范式来检查哪些患者和在什么情况下,变化机制作为代偿机制和恢复机制发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrasting Individual-Specific Resilience and Compensation Personalization Frameworks: The Case of Rumination

Background

Rumination has been identified as a potential mechanism of therapeutic change, particularly in directive and focused psychotherapies for depression. Previous research has predominantly focused on either trait-like individual differences or state-like changes in rumination without integrating these aspects. In the current study, we propose a computational approach to investigating whether rumination serves as a compensatory or a resilience mechanism by integrating trait-like and state-like effects.

Methods

Rumination and depressive symptoms were assessed (in N = 100) pretreatment and repeatedly throughout treatment. Mixed-level models were used to examine whether pretreatment trait-like rumination interacted with a time-variant variable of in-treatment state-like changes in rumination to predict subsequent changes in treatment outcomes. These models were used to determine whether individuals with higher or lower pretreatment trait-like levels of rumination benefited more from state-like reductions in rumination, thus contrasting the compensatory and resilience theoretical frameworks.

Results

As hypothesized, the findings supported the compensatory framework; individuals with higher pretreatment trait-like levels of rumination benefited most from greater state-like reductions in rumination during treatment, as evidenced by greater subsequent symptom reduction (p = .04).

Conclusions

The findings refine our understanding of rumination as an individual-specific mechanism of therapeutic change, dependent on an individual’s trait-like levels of rumination. The proposed computational approach enabled an empirical comparison of the 2 main theoretical frameworks of treatment personalization, compensatory and resilience, offering new insights into mechanisms that drive therapeutic change. Future studies could leverage the paradigm proposed here to examine for which patients and in what contexts mechanisms of change function as compensatory versus resilience mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信