在遭受严重野火影响的地中海森林中,机械化建设防火后覆盖对土壤水文和侵蚀反应的有效性

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Asmae Amiri Ghanat Saman , Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja , Rocío Soria , Pedro Antonio Plaza-Álvarez , Maria Dolores Carmona-Yáñez , Demetrio Antonio Zema
{"title":"在遭受严重野火影响的地中海森林中,机械化建设防火后覆盖对土壤水文和侵蚀反应的有效性","authors":"Asmae Amiri Ghanat Saman ,&nbsp;Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja ,&nbsp;Rocío Soria ,&nbsp;Pedro Antonio Plaza-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Maria Dolores Carmona-Yáñez ,&nbsp;Demetrio Antonio Zema","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Often, forest wildfires are suppressed by the construction of firebreaks using heavy machinery. This may result in increased runoff and erosion due to the removal of ground cover and soil compaction, especially in Mediterranean environments. To avoid this impact, mulching is adopted immediately after fire suppression, but woodchips – widely available as native residues in forests – are less used compared to the most common straw. The effects of these operations on the hydrological and erosive response of soil on machinery tracks remain, however, poorly quantified. In a semi-arid pine forest (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), the hydrological and erosive response of soil to a very intense rainstorm has been measured after mechanised construction of firebreaks in unburned areas and soil mulching with woodchips, using a portable rainfall simulator. The effectiveness of this post-fire management action has also been evaluated in burned areas. Water infiltration, surface runoff and soil loss as well as ground cover and soil properties were compared among: (i) unburned soils subjected to disturbance due to machinery (with or without mulching); and (ii) burned soils treated with mulching or not. Water infiltration and surface runoff did not significantly change after machinery use and mulching. In contrast, erosion increased on machinery tracks, even in comparison with burned soils. Mulching using woodchips reduced soil loss due to wildfire and firebreak construction by over 70 %. This increase in soil's erosive response was mainly due to a severe reduction in ground cover on machinery tracks, but the application of woodchips helped to limit this impact on rainsplash erosion. Moreover, the machinery led to an increase in soil compaction. In this case, mulching was not effective at controlling either this effect of firebreak construction or the increase in soil water repellency surveyed in burned areas. Overall, this study suggests caution in firebreak construction using heavy machinery as well as immediate mulching to reduce soil erosion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 125286"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of mulching after mechanised construction of firebreaks on the hydrological and erosive response of soil in a Mediterranean forest affected by a severe wildfire\",\"authors\":\"Asmae Amiri Ghanat Saman ,&nbsp;Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja ,&nbsp;Rocío Soria ,&nbsp;Pedro Antonio Plaza-Álvarez ,&nbsp;Maria Dolores Carmona-Yáñez ,&nbsp;Demetrio Antonio Zema\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Often, forest wildfires are suppressed by the construction of firebreaks using heavy machinery. This may result in increased runoff and erosion due to the removal of ground cover and soil compaction, especially in Mediterranean environments. To avoid this impact, mulching is adopted immediately after fire suppression, but woodchips – widely available as native residues in forests – are less used compared to the most common straw. The effects of these operations on the hydrological and erosive response of soil on machinery tracks remain, however, poorly quantified. In a semi-arid pine forest (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), the hydrological and erosive response of soil to a very intense rainstorm has been measured after mechanised construction of firebreaks in unburned areas and soil mulching with woodchips, using a portable rainfall simulator. The effectiveness of this post-fire management action has also been evaluated in burned areas. Water infiltration, surface runoff and soil loss as well as ground cover and soil properties were compared among: (i) unburned soils subjected to disturbance due to machinery (with or without mulching); and (ii) burned soils treated with mulching or not. Water infiltration and surface runoff did not significantly change after machinery use and mulching. In contrast, erosion increased on machinery tracks, even in comparison with burned soils. Mulching using woodchips reduced soil loss due to wildfire and firebreak construction by over 70 %. This increase in soil's erosive response was mainly due to a severe reduction in ground cover on machinery tracks, but the application of woodchips helped to limit this impact on rainsplash erosion. Moreover, the machinery led to an increase in soil compaction. In this case, mulching was not effective at controlling either this effect of firebreak construction or the increase in soil water repellency surveyed in burned areas. Overall, this study suggests caution in firebreak construction using heavy machinery as well as immediate mulching to reduce soil erosion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"381 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725012629\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725012629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常,森林野火是通过使用重型机械建造防火带来扑灭的。这可能导致径流和侵蚀增加,因为地面覆盖物的消失和土壤的压实,特别是在地中海环境中。为了避免这种影响,在灭火后立即采取覆盖措施,但与最常见的秸秆相比,木屑-作为森林中的天然残留物广泛存在-的使用较少。然而,这些操作对机械履带上土壤的水文和侵蚀反应的影响仍然很难量化。在半干旱的松林(西班牙Castilla-La Mancha),使用便携式降雨模拟器,在未燃烧地区机械建造防火墙并用木片覆盖土壤后,测量了土壤对强烈暴雨的水文和侵蚀反应。还在烧伤地区评价了这种火灾后管理行动的有效性。在以下情况下比较了水入渗、地表径流和土壤流失以及地面覆盖和土壤性质:(i)未燃烧的土壤受到机械干扰(有或没有覆盖);(2)有无覆盖处理的燃烧土壤。机械使用和地膜覆盖后土壤的入渗和地表径流变化不显著。相比之下,机械履带上的侵蚀增加了,甚至与燃烧的土壤相比也是如此。使用木片覆盖减少了因野火和防火墙建设造成的70%以上的土壤流失。土壤侵蚀反应的增加主要是由于机械轨道上的地面覆盖严重减少,但木屑的应用有助于限制这种对雨水侵蚀的影响。此外,机械导致了土壤压实的增加。在这种情况下,覆盖既不能有效地控制防火墙建设的影响,也不能有效地控制被烧毁地区土壤拒水性的增加。总的来说,这项研究建议在使用重型机械和立即覆盖来减少土壤侵蚀的防火屏障建设中要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of mulching after mechanised construction of firebreaks on the hydrological and erosive response of soil in a Mediterranean forest affected by a severe wildfire
Often, forest wildfires are suppressed by the construction of firebreaks using heavy machinery. This may result in increased runoff and erosion due to the removal of ground cover and soil compaction, especially in Mediterranean environments. To avoid this impact, mulching is adopted immediately after fire suppression, but woodchips – widely available as native residues in forests – are less used compared to the most common straw. The effects of these operations on the hydrological and erosive response of soil on machinery tracks remain, however, poorly quantified. In a semi-arid pine forest (Castilla-La Mancha, Spain), the hydrological and erosive response of soil to a very intense rainstorm has been measured after mechanised construction of firebreaks in unburned areas and soil mulching with woodchips, using a portable rainfall simulator. The effectiveness of this post-fire management action has also been evaluated in burned areas. Water infiltration, surface runoff and soil loss as well as ground cover and soil properties were compared among: (i) unburned soils subjected to disturbance due to machinery (with or without mulching); and (ii) burned soils treated with mulching or not. Water infiltration and surface runoff did not significantly change after machinery use and mulching. In contrast, erosion increased on machinery tracks, even in comparison with burned soils. Mulching using woodchips reduced soil loss due to wildfire and firebreak construction by over 70 %. This increase in soil's erosive response was mainly due to a severe reduction in ground cover on machinery tracks, but the application of woodchips helped to limit this impact on rainsplash erosion. Moreover, the machinery led to an increase in soil compaction. In this case, mulching was not effective at controlling either this effect of firebreak construction or the increase in soil water repellency surveyed in burned areas. Overall, this study suggests caution in firebreak construction using heavy machinery as well as immediate mulching to reduce soil erosion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信