James Goadsby , Siddesh Shetty , Argyro Syngelaki , Soley-Bori Marina , Laura A. Magee , Peter von Dadelszen , Ranjit Akolekar , Sergio A. Silverio , Kayleigh Sheen , Julia Fox-Rushby , Alan Wright , David Wright , Kypros H. Nicolaides
{"title":"预防- pe(足月定时分娩预防先兆子痫):一项随机试验方案","authors":"James Goadsby , Siddesh Shetty , Argyro Syngelaki , Soley-Bori Marina , Laura A. Magee , Peter von Dadelszen , Ranjit Akolekar , Sergio A. Silverio , Kayleigh Sheen , Julia Fox-Rushby , Alan Wright , David Wright , Kypros H. Nicolaides","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2025.101211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate whether term pre-eclampsia (PE) is reduced by screening for PE risk at 35 + 0–36 + 6 weeks’ gestation and offering risk-based, planned early term birth.</div><div>Study design: ‘PREVENT-PE’ is a multicentre, randomised trial (ISRCTN41632964).</div></div><div><h3>Inclusion</h3><div>Singleton pregnancy, presentation for routine fetal ultrasound at 35 + 0–36 + 6 weeks’, and can give informed consent.</div></div><div><h3>Exclusion</h3><div>PE, major fetal abnormality, or participation in a conflicting study. Randomisation (central, 1:1 ratio, minimised for study site, in random permuted blocks) to intervention (screening for term PE risk, and planned early term birth for PE risk ≥ 1 in 50) or control (usual care at term) arms.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Primary: Birth with PE (ISSHP 2021 criteria).</div></div><div><h3>Key secondaries</h3><div>Emergency caesarean and neonatal unit admission ≥ 48 h. Others include within-trial and intermediate-term economic evaluations, and mixed-methods surveys and interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><div>3,201 participants/arm would be required to detect a relative risk (intervention/control) of 0.5, based on 2.0% PE incidence, 90% power, and two-tailed 2.5% significance level; an adaptive design will determine the final sample size (4000–8000) at interim analysis of the first 3,000 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Intention-to-treat. Economic evaluation will measure and value resources and health outcomes for mothers at risk of term PE and newborns (health service perspective). In within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis, the main outcome will be incremental cost per PE case averted, with costs and health outcomes calculated using patient-level data. A decision model will assess cost-utility of the intervention for one year postpartum.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PREVENT-PE will provide data to inform birth choices and maternity services planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevent-PE (pre-eclampsia prevention by timed birth at term): Protocol for a randomised trial\",\"authors\":\"James Goadsby , Siddesh Shetty , Argyro Syngelaki , Soley-Bori Marina , Laura A. Magee , Peter von Dadelszen , Ranjit Akolekar , Sergio A. Silverio , Kayleigh Sheen , Julia Fox-Rushby , Alan Wright , David Wright , Kypros H. Nicolaides\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.preghy.2025.101211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate whether term pre-eclampsia (PE) is reduced by screening for PE risk at 35 + 0–36 + 6 weeks’ gestation and offering risk-based, planned early term birth.</div><div>Study design: ‘PREVENT-PE’ is a multicentre, randomised trial (ISRCTN41632964).</div></div><div><h3>Inclusion</h3><div>Singleton pregnancy, presentation for routine fetal ultrasound at 35 + 0–36 + 6 weeks’, and can give informed consent.</div></div><div><h3>Exclusion</h3><div>PE, major fetal abnormality, or participation in a conflicting study. Randomisation (central, 1:1 ratio, minimised for study site, in random permuted blocks) to intervention (screening for term PE risk, and planned early term birth for PE risk ≥ 1 in 50) or control (usual care at term) arms.</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><div>Primary: Birth with PE (ISSHP 2021 criteria).</div></div><div><h3>Key secondaries</h3><div>Emergency caesarean and neonatal unit admission ≥ 48 h. Others include within-trial and intermediate-term economic evaluations, and mixed-methods surveys and interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Analysis</h3><div>3,201 participants/arm would be required to detect a relative risk (intervention/control) of 0.5, based on 2.0% PE incidence, 90% power, and two-tailed 2.5% significance level; an adaptive design will determine the final sample size (4000–8000) at interim analysis of the first 3,000 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Analyses</h3><div>Intention-to-treat. Economic evaluation will measure and value resources and health outcomes for mothers at risk of term PE and newborns (health service perspective). In within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis, the main outcome will be incremental cost per PE case averted, with costs and health outcomes calculated using patient-level data. A decision model will assess cost-utility of the intervention for one year postpartum.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PREVENT-PE will provide data to inform birth choices and maternity services planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210778925000273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210778925000273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevent-PE (pre-eclampsia prevention by timed birth at term): Protocol for a randomised trial
Objectives
To evaluate whether term pre-eclampsia (PE) is reduced by screening for PE risk at 35 + 0–36 + 6 weeks’ gestation and offering risk-based, planned early term birth.
Study design: ‘PREVENT-PE’ is a multicentre, randomised trial (ISRCTN41632964).
Inclusion
Singleton pregnancy, presentation for routine fetal ultrasound at 35 + 0–36 + 6 weeks’, and can give informed consent.
Exclusion
PE, major fetal abnormality, or participation in a conflicting study. Randomisation (central, 1:1 ratio, minimised for study site, in random permuted blocks) to intervention (screening for term PE risk, and planned early term birth for PE risk ≥ 1 in 50) or control (usual care at term) arms.
Outcomes
Primary: Birth with PE (ISSHP 2021 criteria).
Key secondaries
Emergency caesarean and neonatal unit admission ≥ 48 h. Others include within-trial and intermediate-term economic evaluations, and mixed-methods surveys and interviews.
Analysis
3,201 participants/arm would be required to detect a relative risk (intervention/control) of 0.5, based on 2.0% PE incidence, 90% power, and two-tailed 2.5% significance level; an adaptive design will determine the final sample size (4000–8000) at interim analysis of the first 3,000 participants.
Analyses
Intention-to-treat. Economic evaluation will measure and value resources and health outcomes for mothers at risk of term PE and newborns (health service perspective). In within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis, the main outcome will be incremental cost per PE case averted, with costs and health outcomes calculated using patient-level data. A decision model will assess cost-utility of the intervention for one year postpartum.
Conclusions
PREVENT-PE will provide data to inform birth choices and maternity services planning.
期刊介绍:
Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women''s Cardiovascular Health aims to stimulate research in the field of hypertension in pregnancy, disseminate the useful results of such research, and advance education in the field.
We publish articles pertaining to human and animal blood pressure during gestation, hypertension during gestation including physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy. The subtitle reflects the wider aspects of studying hypertension in pregnancy thus we also publish articles on in utero programming, nutrition, long term effects of hypertension in pregnancy on cardiovascular health and other research that helps our understanding of the etiology or consequences of hypertension in pregnancy. Case reports are not published unless of exceptional/outstanding importance to the field.