在弯曲的经耻骨通道中使用预弯曲导丝改良技术螺钉固定耻骨上支骨折-一项非劣效性的初步研究

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nico Hinz , Alena Seffert , Darius Thiesen , Esko Meine , Mohamad Hadi Nasri , Karl-Heinz Frosch , Maximilian Hartel
{"title":"在弯曲的经耻骨通道中使用预弯曲导丝改良技术螺钉固定耻骨上支骨折-一项非劣效性的初步研究","authors":"Nico Hinz ,&nbsp;Alena Seffert ,&nbsp;Darius Thiesen ,&nbsp;Esko Meine ,&nbsp;Mohamad Hadi Nasri ,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Frosch ,&nbsp;Maximilian Hartel","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transpubic screw fixation is a valuable option for stabilization of superior pubic ramus fractures. However, insertion of a transpubic screw can be challenging or sometimes even impossible due to a narrow or curved transpubic screw corridor, which is present in 38 % of cases. To overcome this problem, a modified technique for insertion of a transpubic screw by advancing a pre-bent guidewire in an ESIN-like fashion is described.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, non-inferiority pilot study with patients, who received a transpubic screw, was performed to investigate potential procedure-associated complications as well as short-term radiological and clinical outcomes of the modified technique in comparison to the classical technique for insertion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 01/2021 to 04/2024, 24 transpubic screws were inserted at two major trauma centers, of which nine screws were inserted using the modified technique. Ten patients with a total of eleven transpubic screws (modified technique: 5; classical technique: 6) were available for this pilot study. One patient from the modified technique subgroup experienced a screw migration without affecting fracture healing and without necessitating hardware removal. The complication rate of the modified technique was not significantly inferior to the classical technique (p = 0.50). Residual displacement of the pubic ramus fracture was not significantly inferior using the modified technique compared to the classical technique (modified: 5.0 ± 2.2 mm; classical 4.4 ± 3.3 mm; p = 0.38). The clinical outcome was not significantly inferior using the modified technique compared to the classical technique regarding VAS pain (modified: 2.4 ± 4.3; classical 2.6 ± 2.5; p = 0.47), VAS satisfaction (modified: 8.8 ± 1.8; classical 9.0 ± 1.0; p = 0.42) and Majeed score (modified: 82.0 ± 12.6; classical 90.0 ± 12.5; p = 0.17).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified technique for insertion of a transpubic screw using a pre-bent guidewire is feasible in narrow and particularly curved transpubic corridors. It was not inferior compared to the classical technique regarding complications as well as short-term radiological and clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 112318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screw fixation of superior pubic ramus fractures using a modified technique with a pre-bent guidewire in curved transpubic corridors – A non-inferiority pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Nico Hinz ,&nbsp;Alena Seffert ,&nbsp;Darius Thiesen ,&nbsp;Esko Meine ,&nbsp;Mohamad Hadi Nasri ,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Frosch ,&nbsp;Maximilian Hartel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transpubic screw fixation is a valuable option for stabilization of superior pubic ramus fractures. However, insertion of a transpubic screw can be challenging or sometimes even impossible due to a narrow or curved transpubic screw corridor, which is present in 38 % of cases. To overcome this problem, a modified technique for insertion of a transpubic screw by advancing a pre-bent guidewire in an ESIN-like fashion is described.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, non-inferiority pilot study with patients, who received a transpubic screw, was performed to investigate potential procedure-associated complications as well as short-term radiological and clinical outcomes of the modified technique in comparison to the classical technique for insertion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 01/2021 to 04/2024, 24 transpubic screws were inserted at two major trauma centers, of which nine screws were inserted using the modified technique. Ten patients with a total of eleven transpubic screws (modified technique: 5; classical technique: 6) were available for this pilot study. One patient from the modified technique subgroup experienced a screw migration without affecting fracture healing and without necessitating hardware removal. The complication rate of the modified technique was not significantly inferior to the classical technique (p = 0.50). Residual displacement of the pubic ramus fracture was not significantly inferior using the modified technique compared to the classical technique (modified: 5.0 ± 2.2 mm; classical 4.4 ± 3.3 mm; p = 0.38). The clinical outcome was not significantly inferior using the modified technique compared to the classical technique regarding VAS pain (modified: 2.4 ± 4.3; classical 2.6 ± 2.5; p = 0.47), VAS satisfaction (modified: 8.8 ± 1.8; classical 9.0 ± 1.0; p = 0.42) and Majeed score (modified: 82.0 ± 12.6; classical 90.0 ± 12.5; p = 0.17).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The modified technique for insertion of a transpubic screw using a pre-bent guidewire is feasible in narrow and particularly curved transpubic corridors. It was not inferior compared to the classical technique regarding complications as well as short-term radiological and clinical outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 112318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325001780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325001780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经耻骨螺钉固定是稳定耻骨上支骨折的一种有价值的选择。然而,由于耻骨螺钉通道狭窄或弯曲,在38%的病例中,插入耻骨螺钉是具有挑战性的,有时甚至是不可能的。为了克服这个问题,本文描述了一种改进的技术,通过以esin样的方式推进预弯曲导丝来插入耻骨螺钉。材料和方法对接受经耻骨螺钉的患者进行了回顾性、非劣效性的初步研究,以研究与传统置入技术相比,改良技术的潜在手术相关并发症以及短期放射学和临床结果。结果2021年1月至2024年4月,两大创伤中心共置入24枚经耻骨螺钉,其中9枚采用改良技术置入。10例患者共11枚经耻骨螺钉(改良技术:5枚;经典技术:6)可用于本初步研究。改良技术亚组中有1例患者在不影响骨折愈合的情况下进行了螺钉移位,也不需要取出内固定物。改良技术的并发症发生率不明显低于经典技术(p = 0.50)。改良技术与经典技术相比,耻骨支骨折残余移位不明显降低(改良:5.0±2.2 mm;经典4.4±3.3 mm;P = 0.38)。在VAS疼痛方面,改良技术的临床结果与经典技术相比并无明显差异(改良:2.4±4.3;经典2.6±2.5;p = 0.47), VAS满意度(修正后:8.8±1.8;经典9.0±1.0;p = 0.42)和Majeed评分(修正:82.0±12.6;经典90.0±12.5;P = 0.17)。结论经预弯导丝改良技术在狭窄且特别弯曲的经耻骨通道内置入螺钉是可行的。在并发症以及短期放射学和临床结果方面,与传统技术相比,它并不逊色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screw fixation of superior pubic ramus fractures using a modified technique with a pre-bent guidewire in curved transpubic corridors – A non-inferiority pilot study

Introduction

Transpubic screw fixation is a valuable option for stabilization of superior pubic ramus fractures. However, insertion of a transpubic screw can be challenging or sometimes even impossible due to a narrow or curved transpubic screw corridor, which is present in 38 % of cases. To overcome this problem, a modified technique for insertion of a transpubic screw by advancing a pre-bent guidewire in an ESIN-like fashion is described.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective, non-inferiority pilot study with patients, who received a transpubic screw, was performed to investigate potential procedure-associated complications as well as short-term radiological and clinical outcomes of the modified technique in comparison to the classical technique for insertion.

Results

From 01/2021 to 04/2024, 24 transpubic screws were inserted at two major trauma centers, of which nine screws were inserted using the modified technique. Ten patients with a total of eleven transpubic screws (modified technique: 5; classical technique: 6) were available for this pilot study. One patient from the modified technique subgroup experienced a screw migration without affecting fracture healing and without necessitating hardware removal. The complication rate of the modified technique was not significantly inferior to the classical technique (p = 0.50). Residual displacement of the pubic ramus fracture was not significantly inferior using the modified technique compared to the classical technique (modified: 5.0 ± 2.2 mm; classical 4.4 ± 3.3 mm; p = 0.38). The clinical outcome was not significantly inferior using the modified technique compared to the classical technique regarding VAS pain (modified: 2.4 ± 4.3; classical 2.6 ± 2.5; p = 0.47), VAS satisfaction (modified: 8.8 ± 1.8; classical 9.0 ± 1.0; p = 0.42) and Majeed score (modified: 82.0 ± 12.6; classical 90.0 ± 12.5; p = 0.17).

Conclusion

The modified technique for insertion of a transpubic screw using a pre-bent guidewire is feasible in narrow and particularly curved transpubic corridors. It was not inferior compared to the classical technique regarding complications as well as short-term radiological and clinical outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信