Annemiek Hermans , Auriel Sumner-Hempel , Xantia van den Brink , Daniël van Berkel , Renate A. Olie , Hendrik V. Winter , Albertinka Murk , Reindert Nijland
{"title":"在海上风力发电场中","authors":"Annemiek Hermans , Auriel Sumner-Hempel , Xantia van den Brink , Daniël van Berkel , Renate A. Olie , Hendrik V. Winter , Albertinka Murk , Reindert Nijland","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of offshore wind farms (OWFs) in coastal seas presents both risks and opportunities for threatened elasmobranch populations, but their actual influence on elasmobranch presence and habitat use remains unclear. As more OWFs are planned, the lack of available space puts pressure on stakeholders to create multi-use areas as demands from fisheries, conservation and the energy sector become increasingly overlapping. Insight into interactions between these demands is needed to support policymakers in marine spatial planning and management decisions. One of the important questions is to what extent OWFs influence elasmobranch presence and habitat use. Here, we (i) ascertain elasmobranch occurrence in OWFs, (ii) determine whether elasmobranch presence varies between sampling locations, and (iii) investigate the influence of seasonality on elasmobranch presence. We collected 436 seawater samples within four OWFs and the presence of 5 different elasmobranch species (2 sharks, 3 skates) was confirmed. The overall detection probability of elasmobranchs in the four OWFs was 8.5 %. A quarterly sampling campaign over 2 years demonstrated the seasonality of <em>Mustelus asterias</em> on the subsea power cables, which corresponded with known migratory movements of this species. Our findings confirm that sharks and skates are present in OWFs. We advise caution when introducing multi-use activities that could counteract the benefits of bottom trawling fisheries exclusion. Investigating how these threatened species use OWFs would aid policymakers in determining the (multi-use) function of OWFs in terms of EU legislative acts including the Habitat Directive, MSFD, Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the Nature Restoration Law.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 107671"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elasmobranchs in offshore wind farms\",\"authors\":\"Annemiek Hermans , Auriel Sumner-Hempel , Xantia van den Brink , Daniël van Berkel , Renate A. Olie , Hendrik V. Winter , Albertinka Murk , Reindert Nijland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The development of offshore wind farms (OWFs) in coastal seas presents both risks and opportunities for threatened elasmobranch populations, but their actual influence on elasmobranch presence and habitat use remains unclear. As more OWFs are planned, the lack of available space puts pressure on stakeholders to create multi-use areas as demands from fisheries, conservation and the energy sector become increasingly overlapping. Insight into interactions between these demands is needed to support policymakers in marine spatial planning and management decisions. One of the important questions is to what extent OWFs influence elasmobranch presence and habitat use. Here, we (i) ascertain elasmobranch occurrence in OWFs, (ii) determine whether elasmobranch presence varies between sampling locations, and (iii) investigate the influence of seasonality on elasmobranch presence. We collected 436 seawater samples within four OWFs and the presence of 5 different elasmobranch species (2 sharks, 3 skates) was confirmed. The overall detection probability of elasmobranchs in the four OWFs was 8.5 %. A quarterly sampling campaign over 2 years demonstrated the seasonality of <em>Mustelus asterias</em> on the subsea power cables, which corresponded with known migratory movements of this species. Our findings confirm that sharks and skates are present in OWFs. We advise caution when introducing multi-use activities that could counteract the benefits of bottom trawling fisheries exclusion. Investigating how these threatened species use OWFs would aid policymakers in determining the (multi-use) function of OWFs in terms of EU legislative acts including the Habitat Directive, MSFD, Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the Nature Restoration Law.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"266 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001334\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The development of offshore wind farms (OWFs) in coastal seas presents both risks and opportunities for threatened elasmobranch populations, but their actual influence on elasmobranch presence and habitat use remains unclear. As more OWFs are planned, the lack of available space puts pressure on stakeholders to create multi-use areas as demands from fisheries, conservation and the energy sector become increasingly overlapping. Insight into interactions between these demands is needed to support policymakers in marine spatial planning and management decisions. One of the important questions is to what extent OWFs influence elasmobranch presence and habitat use. Here, we (i) ascertain elasmobranch occurrence in OWFs, (ii) determine whether elasmobranch presence varies between sampling locations, and (iii) investigate the influence of seasonality on elasmobranch presence. We collected 436 seawater samples within four OWFs and the presence of 5 different elasmobranch species (2 sharks, 3 skates) was confirmed. The overall detection probability of elasmobranchs in the four OWFs was 8.5 %. A quarterly sampling campaign over 2 years demonstrated the seasonality of Mustelus asterias on the subsea power cables, which corresponded with known migratory movements of this species. Our findings confirm that sharks and skates are present in OWFs. We advise caution when introducing multi-use activities that could counteract the benefits of bottom trawling fisheries exclusion. Investigating how these threatened species use OWFs would aid policymakers in determining the (multi-use) function of OWFs in terms of EU legislative acts including the Habitat Directive, MSFD, Biodiversity Strategy 2030 and the Nature Restoration Law.
期刊介绍:
Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels.
We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts.
Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.