在联邦医学成像中实现灵活的公平性指标

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Huijun Xing, Rui Sun, Jinke Ren, Jun Wei, Chun-Mei Feng, Xuan Ding, Zilu Guo, Yu Wang, Yudong Hu, Wei Wei, Xiaohua Ban, Chuanlong Xie, Yu Tan, Xian Liu, Shuguang Cui, Xiaohui Duan, Zhen Li
{"title":"在联邦医学成像中实现灵活的公平性指标","authors":"Huijun Xing, Rui Sun, Jinke Ren, Jun Wei, Chun-Mei Feng, Xuan Ding, Zilu Guo, Yu Wang, Yudong Hu, Wei Wei, Xiaohua Ban, Chuanlong Xie, Yu Tan, Xian Liu, Shuguang Cui, Xiaohui Duan, Zhen Li","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-58549-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical imaging raises fairness and privacy concerns across demographic groups, especially in diagnosis and treatment decisions. While federated learning (FL) offers decentralized privacy preservation, current frameworks often prioritize collaboration fairness over group fairness, risking healthcare disparities. Here we present FlexFair, an innovative FL framework designed to address both fairness and privacy challenges. FlexFair incorporates a flexible regularization term to facilitate the integration of multiple fairness criteria, including equal accuracy, demographic parity, and equal opportunity. Evaluated across four clinical applications (polyp segmentation, fundus vascular segmentation, cervical cancer segmentation, and skin disease diagnosis), FlexFair outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both fairness and accuracy. Moreover, we curate a multi-center dataset for cervical cancer segmentation that includes 678 patients from four hospitals. This diverse dataset allows for a more comprehensive analysis of model performance across different population groups, ensuring the findings are applicable to a broader range of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving flexible fairness metrics in federated medical imaging\",\"authors\":\"Huijun Xing, Rui Sun, Jinke Ren, Jun Wei, Chun-Mei Feng, Xuan Ding, Zilu Guo, Yu Wang, Yudong Hu, Wei Wei, Xiaohua Ban, Chuanlong Xie, Yu Tan, Xian Liu, Shuguang Cui, Xiaohui Duan, Zhen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41467-025-58549-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical imaging raises fairness and privacy concerns across demographic groups, especially in diagnosis and treatment decisions. While federated learning (FL) offers decentralized privacy preservation, current frameworks often prioritize collaboration fairness over group fairness, risking healthcare disparities. Here we present FlexFair, an innovative FL framework designed to address both fairness and privacy challenges. FlexFair incorporates a flexible regularization term to facilitate the integration of multiple fairness criteria, including equal accuracy, demographic parity, and equal opportunity. Evaluated across four clinical applications (polyp segmentation, fundus vascular segmentation, cervical cancer segmentation, and skin disease diagnosis), FlexFair outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both fairness and accuracy. Moreover, we curate a multi-center dataset for cervical cancer segmentation that includes 678 patients from four hospitals. This diverse dataset allows for a more comprehensive analysis of model performance across different population groups, ensuring the findings are applicable to a broader range of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Communications\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58549-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58549-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在医学成像领域的迅速应用引发了不同人群对公平和隐私的担忧,尤其是在诊断和治疗决策方面。虽然联邦学习(FL)提供去中心化的隐私保护,但当前的框架往往优先考虑协作公平性而不是群体公平性,这可能会导致医疗保健差异。在这里,我们提出FlexFair,一个创新的FL框架,旨在解决公平和隐私的挑战。FlexFair包含一个灵活的正则化术语,以促进多种公平标准的整合,包括同等准确性、人口均等和机会均等。通过四个临床应用(息肉分割、眼底血管分割、宫颈癌分割和皮肤病诊断)的评估,FlexFair在公平性和准确性方面都优于最先进的方法。此外,我们策划了一个多中心的子宫颈癌分割数据集,其中包括来自四家医院的678名患者。这种多样化的数据集允许对不同人群的模型性能进行更全面的分析,确保研究结果适用于更广泛的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Achieving flexible fairness metrics in federated medical imaging

Achieving flexible fairness metrics in federated medical imaging

The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical imaging raises fairness and privacy concerns across demographic groups, especially in diagnosis and treatment decisions. While federated learning (FL) offers decentralized privacy preservation, current frameworks often prioritize collaboration fairness over group fairness, risking healthcare disparities. Here we present FlexFair, an innovative FL framework designed to address both fairness and privacy challenges. FlexFair incorporates a flexible regularization term to facilitate the integration of multiple fairness criteria, including equal accuracy, demographic parity, and equal opportunity. Evaluated across four clinical applications (polyp segmentation, fundus vascular segmentation, cervical cancer segmentation, and skin disease diagnosis), FlexFair outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both fairness and accuracy. Moreover, we curate a multi-center dataset for cervical cancer segmentation that includes 678 patients from four hospitals. This diverse dataset allows for a more comprehensive analysis of model performance across different population groups, ensuring the findings are applicable to a broader range of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信