Candrive老年驾驶员风险分层工具在评估澳大利亚老年驾驶员健康驾驶能力方面的验证。

Judith L Charlton, Sjaan Koppel, Amanda Stephens, Michel Bedard, Jennifer Howcroft, Peteris Darzins, Marilyn Di Stefano, Sylvain Gagnon, Isabelle Gelinas, Malcolm Man-Son-Hing, Anita Myers, Gary Naglie, Michelle M Porter, Mark Rapoport, Brenda Vrkljan, Shawn Marshall
{"title":"Candrive老年驾驶员风险分层工具在评估澳大利亚老年驾驶员健康驾驶能力方面的验证。","authors":"Judith L Charlton, Sjaan Koppel, Amanda Stephens, Michel Bedard, Jennifer Howcroft, Peteris Darzins, Marilyn Di Stefano, Sylvain Gagnon, Isabelle Gelinas, Malcolm Man-Son-Hing, Anita Myers, Gary Naglie, Michelle M Porter, Mark Rapoport, Brenda Vrkljan, Shawn Marshall","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing older drivers' fitness-to-drive is challenging, with decisions impacting mobility and health. This study aimed to validate the Candrive older driver risk stratification tool for screening medical fitness-to-drive in an independent cohort of older adults from the Ozcandrive 8-year prospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of drivers aged 75 and older residing in Melbourne, Australia completed the Candrive assessments. Their vehicles were instrumented to collect vehicle and global positioning system data, including trip distance. The first 4 years of Ozcandrive data were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was self-reported at-fault collisions, adjusted per 10 000 km driven. Collision risk status was modeled using Generalized Estimating Equations with Poisson regression using predetermined Candrive risk stratification tool predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 older drivers (70.8% male) were recruited with an average age at study enrollment of 79.7 years (standard deviation = 3.5). Of the 755 adjusted person-years of driving, 74.1% were in the Low risk category (vs original sample, Candrive: 74.8%) and 10.5% were in the Low-Medium risk category (Candrive: 9.3%). Only 15.4% were in the Medium-High risk category (Candrive: 15.9%), where the relative risk for self-reported at-fault collisions was 1.79 (95% confidence interval = 1.06-3.03) compared to the Low risk category.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an association between self-reported at-fault collisions and Candrive risk stratification tool scores. This result is promising given the primary outcome measure differed from the original Candrive study that used police-reported, at-fault collisions, and supports Candrive risk stratification tool's use by healthcare providers when initiating fitness-to-drive conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Candrive Older Driver Risk Stratification Tool for Assessing Medical Fitness-to-Drive in Older Australian Drivers.\",\"authors\":\"Judith L Charlton, Sjaan Koppel, Amanda Stephens, Michel Bedard, Jennifer Howcroft, Peteris Darzins, Marilyn Di Stefano, Sylvain Gagnon, Isabelle Gelinas, Malcolm Man-Son-Hing, Anita Myers, Gary Naglie, Michelle M Porter, Mark Rapoport, Brenda Vrkljan, Shawn Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing older drivers' fitness-to-drive is challenging, with decisions impacting mobility and health. This study aimed to validate the Candrive older driver risk stratification tool for screening medical fitness-to-drive in an independent cohort of older adults from the Ozcandrive 8-year prospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of drivers aged 75 and older residing in Melbourne, Australia completed the Candrive assessments. Their vehicles were instrumented to collect vehicle and global positioning system data, including trip distance. The first 4 years of Ozcandrive data were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was self-reported at-fault collisions, adjusted per 10 000 km driven. Collision risk status was modeled using Generalized Estimating Equations with Poisson regression using predetermined Candrive risk stratification tool predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 older drivers (70.8% male) were recruited with an average age at study enrollment of 79.7 years (standard deviation = 3.5). Of the 755 adjusted person-years of driving, 74.1% were in the Low risk category (vs original sample, Candrive: 74.8%) and 10.5% were in the Low-Medium risk category (Candrive: 9.3%). Only 15.4% were in the Medium-High risk category (Candrive: 15.9%), where the relative risk for self-reported at-fault collisions was 1.79 (95% confidence interval = 1.06-3.03) compared to the Low risk category.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates an association between self-reported at-fault collisions and Candrive risk stratification tool scores. This result is promising given the primary outcome measure differed from the original Candrive study that used police-reported, at-fault collisions, and supports Candrive risk stratification tool's use by healthcare providers when initiating fitness-to-drive conversations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095997/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估老年驾驶员的健康驾驶能力(FTD)是具有挑战性的,决策影响移动性和健康。本研究旨在验证Candrive老年驾驶员风险分层工具(RST)在Ozcandrive 8年前瞻性研究中筛查医学FTD的独立老年人队列中的作用。方法:选取居住在澳大利亚墨尔本的75岁及以上司机作为方便样本,完成Candrive评估。他们的车辆安装了仪器,以收集车辆和全球定位系统(GPS)数据,包括行程距离。对Ozcandrive前四年的数据进行了分析。主要结果衡量标准是自我报告的过失碰撞,每行驶1万公里调整一次。采用预定Candrive RST预测变量,采用泊松回归广义估计方程对碰撞风险状态进行建模。结果:共招募了257名老年驾驶员,其中70.8%为男性,入组时平均年龄为79.7岁(标准差(SD) = 3.5)。在755个调整后的驾驶人年中,74.1%属于低风险类别(相对于原始样本,Candrive: 74.8%), 10.5%属于中低风险类别(Candrive: 9.3%)。只有15.4%的人处于中高风险类别(Candrive: 15.9%),与低风险类别相比,自我报告的过错碰撞的相对风险为1.79(95%置信区间[CI]= 1.06-3.03)。结论:本研究证明了自我报告的过错碰撞与Candrive RST评分之间的关联。考虑到主要结果测量不同于最初的Candrive研究(使用警察报告的过错碰撞),该结果是有希望的,并且支持医疗保健提供者在发起FTD对话时使用Candrive RST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Candrive Older Driver Risk Stratification Tool for Assessing Medical Fitness-to-Drive in Older Australian Drivers.

Background: Assessing older drivers' fitness-to-drive is challenging, with decisions impacting mobility and health. This study aimed to validate the Candrive older driver risk stratification tool for screening medical fitness-to-drive in an independent cohort of older adults from the Ozcandrive 8-year prospective study.

Methods: A convenience sample of drivers aged 75 and older residing in Melbourne, Australia completed the Candrive assessments. Their vehicles were instrumented to collect vehicle and global positioning system data, including trip distance. The first 4 years of Ozcandrive data were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was self-reported at-fault collisions, adjusted per 10 000 km driven. Collision risk status was modeled using Generalized Estimating Equations with Poisson regression using predetermined Candrive risk stratification tool predictor variables.

Results: A total of 257 older drivers (70.8% male) were recruited with an average age at study enrollment of 79.7 years (standard deviation = 3.5). Of the 755 adjusted person-years of driving, 74.1% were in the Low risk category (vs original sample, Candrive: 74.8%) and 10.5% were in the Low-Medium risk category (Candrive: 9.3%). Only 15.4% were in the Medium-High risk category (Candrive: 15.9%), where the relative risk for self-reported at-fault collisions was 1.79 (95% confidence interval = 1.06-3.03) compared to the Low risk category.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between self-reported at-fault collisions and Candrive risk stratification tool scores. This result is promising given the primary outcome measure differed from the original Candrive study that used police-reported, at-fault collisions, and supports Candrive risk stratification tool's use by healthcare providers when initiating fitness-to-drive conversations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信