Dong-Su Ryu, Jae-Kwan Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Jong-Bin Lee
{"title":"侧窗入路一期和二期上颌窦提升种植体的存活率和边缘骨丢失比较:5年回顾性研究。","authors":"Dong-Su Ryu, Jae-Kwan Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Jong-Bin Lee","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare survival rates and the marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants placed in patients with one-stage or two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation via the lateral window approach (MSALW) using only deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dental records and radiologic data of patients who had implants placed with MSALW were collected. The patients were divided according to the one-stage and two-stage MSALW, and the survival rate of each group was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. The MBL of each group was measured through periapical radiographs at each defined time period. Statistical analysis of the differences between groups was conducted through the log-rank test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Univariate and multivariate regression tests wereperformed to analyze the degree of influence the interested variables had on the implant survival rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative survival rates between the one-stage and two-stage MSALW at the implant level (91.0% and 90.6%, respectively; P = .201) or at the patient level (89.7% and 89.7%, respectively; P = .330). There was a slight difference in MBL at the initial time point, but there was no significant difference for the total period (P = .289). Diabetes was found to have a negative effect on implant survival (P = .015; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.669).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative survival rate or the 2-year MBL of implants between the one-stage and two-stage MSALW using DBBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"40 2","pages":"197-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Loss of Dental Implants with One- or Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation by Lateral Window Approach: 5-Year Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Su Ryu, Jae-Kwan Lee, Heung-Sik Um, Jong-Bin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare survival rates and the marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants placed in patients with one-stage or two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation via the lateral window approach (MSALW) using only deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dental records and radiologic data of patients who had implants placed with MSALW were collected. The patients were divided according to the one-stage and two-stage MSALW, and the survival rate of each group was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. The MBL of each group was measured through periapical radiographs at each defined time period. Statistical analysis of the differences between groups was conducted through the log-rank test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Univariate and multivariate regression tests wereperformed to analyze the degree of influence the interested variables had on the implant survival rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative survival rates between the one-stage and two-stage MSALW at the implant level (91.0% and 90.6%, respectively; P = .201) or at the patient level (89.7% and 89.7%, respectively; P = .330). There was a slight difference in MBL at the initial time point, but there was no significant difference for the total period (P = .289). Diabetes was found to have a negative effect on implant survival (P = .015; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.669).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative survival rate or the 2-year MBL of implants between the one-stage and two-stage MSALW using DBBM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"197-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Survival Rate and Marginal Bone Loss of Dental Implants with One- or Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation by Lateral Window Approach: 5-Year Retrospective Study.
Purpose: To compare survival rates and the marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants placed in patients with one-stage or two-stage maxillary sinus augmentation via the lateral window approach (MSALW) using only deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).
Materials and methods: The dental records and radiologic data of patients who had implants placed with MSALW were collected. The patients were divided according to the one-stage and two-stage MSALW, and the survival rate of each group was measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. The MBL of each group was measured through periapical radiographs at each defined time period. Statistical analysis of the differences between groups was conducted through the log-rank test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Univariate and multivariate regression tests wereperformed to analyze the degree of influence the interested variables had on the implant survival rate.
Results: There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative survival rates between the one-stage and two-stage MSALW at the implant level (91.0% and 90.6%, respectively; P = .201) or at the patient level (89.7% and 89.7%, respectively; P = .330). There was a slight difference in MBL at the initial time point, but there was no significant difference for the total period (P = .289). Diabetes was found to have a negative effect on implant survival (P = .015; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.669).
Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative survival rate or the 2-year MBL of implants between the one-stage and two-stage MSALW using DBBM.