经支气管纵隔冷冻活检诊断率和围手术期患者管理:单一三级中心经验。

0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Nadia Corcione, Alfonso Pecoraro, Andrea Fidecicchi, Severo Campione, Lina Zuccatosta, Giuseppe Failla
{"title":"经支气管纵隔冷冻活检诊断率和围手术期患者管理:单一三级中心经验。","authors":"Nadia Corcione, Alfonso Pecoraro, Andrea Fidecicchi, Severo Campione, Lina Zuccatosta, Giuseppe Failla","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2024-12-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used to diagnose mediastinal lesions; however, small cytology samples from EBUS-TBNA may be inadequate in cases of benign lung diseases, hematologic disorders, and to assess the molecular profile of primary lung cancer (PLC). EBUS-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (TMC) obtains histological samples and potentially implies a higher diagnostic yield (DY) than EBUS-TBNA. The clinical impact of this technique and the perioperative patient management are still unclear. Our aim was to critically analyze our experience with TMC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate TMC DY and perioperative routine over 11 months (February 2023-January 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients were included. The overall DY was 41.5% and 95.1% for EBUS-TBNA and TMC, respectively. TMC provided a higher DY than EBUS-TBNA in cases of hematologic disorders, benign diseases, and uncommon tumors (31% for EBUS-TBNA and 100% for TMC; 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.1-85.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). For PLC, the DY and the assessment of immunohistochemical marker expression did not significantly differ between the two techniques (80% for EBUS-TBNA and 100% for TMC; 95% CI: -4.79-44.8, <i>P</i> = 0.13). The management of antithrombotic therapy was the same as that of EBUS-TBNA. Sedatives were administered to achieve deep sedation. After the procedure, no step-up in the level of care was observed, either in outpatients or in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMC had a better DY than EBUS-TBNA in hematologic disorders, benign lung disease, and uncommon tumors, with an optimal tolerability profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Diagnostic Yield and Perioperative Patient Management: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Corcione, Alfonso Pecoraro, Andrea Fidecicchi, Severo Campione, Lina Zuccatosta, Giuseppe Failla\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2024-12-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used to diagnose mediastinal lesions; however, small cytology samples from EBUS-TBNA may be inadequate in cases of benign lung diseases, hematologic disorders, and to assess the molecular profile of primary lung cancer (PLC). EBUS-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (TMC) obtains histological samples and potentially implies a higher diagnostic yield (DY) than EBUS-TBNA. The clinical impact of this technique and the perioperative patient management are still unclear. Our aim was to critically analyze our experience with TMC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate TMC DY and perioperative routine over 11 months (February 2023-January 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one patients were included. The overall DY was 41.5% and 95.1% for EBUS-TBNA and TMC, respectively. TMC provided a higher DY than EBUS-TBNA in cases of hematologic disorders, benign diseases, and uncommon tumors (31% for EBUS-TBNA and 100% for TMC; 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.1-85.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). For PLC, the DY and the assessment of immunohistochemical marker expression did not significantly differ between the two techniques (80% for EBUS-TBNA and 100% for TMC; 95% CI: -4.79-44.8, <i>P</i> = 0.13). The management of antithrombotic therapy was the same as that of EBUS-TBNA. Sedatives were administered to achieve deep sedation. After the procedure, no step-up in the level of care was observed, either in outpatients or in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMC had a better DY than EBUS-TBNA in hematologic disorders, benign lung disease, and uncommon tumors, with an optimal tolerability profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thoracic research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2024-12-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2025.2024-12-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:超声引导下支气管穿刺(EBUS-TBNA)在纵隔病变诊断中的应用越来越广泛;然而,EBUS-TBNA的小细胞学样本可能不足以用于良性肺部疾病、血液学疾病和评估原发性肺癌(PLC)的分子谱。ebus引导的经支气管纵隔低温活检(TMC)获得组织学样本,可能意味着比EBUS-TBNA更高的诊断率(DY)。该技术的临床影响和围手术期患者管理尚不清楚。我们的目的是批判性地分析我们在TMC方面的经验。材料与方法:采用单中心回顾性研究,评估TMC患者DY及围手术期常规(2023年2月- 2024年1月)11个月。结果:纳入41例患者。EBUS-TBNA和TMC的总DY分别为41.5%和95.1%。在血液病、良性疾病和罕见肿瘤病例中,TMC提供的DY高于EBUS-TBNA (EBUS-TBNA为31%,TMC为100%;95%置信区间(CI): 52.1-85.8, P < 0.001)。对于PLC,两种技术之间的DY和免疫组织化学标志物表达评估无显著差异(EBUS-TBNA为80%,TMC为100%;95% ci: -4.79-44.8, p = 0.13)。抗栓治疗方法与EBUS-TBNA相同。给予镇静剂以达到深度镇静。手术后,无论是门诊患者还是Charlson合并症指数≥5的患者,均未观察到护理水平的提高。结论:TMC对血液疾病、良性肺部疾病和罕见肿瘤的治疗效果优于EBUS-TBNA,耐受性较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transbronchial Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Diagnostic Yield and Perioperative Patient Management: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

Objective: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used to diagnose mediastinal lesions; however, small cytology samples from EBUS-TBNA may be inadequate in cases of benign lung diseases, hematologic disorders, and to assess the molecular profile of primary lung cancer (PLC). EBUS-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (TMC) obtains histological samples and potentially implies a higher diagnostic yield (DY) than EBUS-TBNA. The clinical impact of this technique and the perioperative patient management are still unclear. Our aim was to critically analyze our experience with TMC.

Material and methods: A single center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate TMC DY and perioperative routine over 11 months (February 2023-January 2024).

Results: Forty-one patients were included. The overall DY was 41.5% and 95.1% for EBUS-TBNA and TMC, respectively. TMC provided a higher DY than EBUS-TBNA in cases of hematologic disorders, benign diseases, and uncommon tumors (31% for EBUS-TBNA and 100% for TMC; 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.1-85.8, P < 0.001). For PLC, the DY and the assessment of immunohistochemical marker expression did not significantly differ between the two techniques (80% for EBUS-TBNA and 100% for TMC; 95% CI: -4.79-44.8, P = 0.13). The management of antithrombotic therapy was the same as that of EBUS-TBNA. Sedatives were administered to achieve deep sedation. After the procedure, no step-up in the level of care was observed, either in outpatients or in patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥5.

Conclusion: TMC had a better DY than EBUS-TBNA in hematologic disorders, benign lung disease, and uncommon tumors, with an optimal tolerability profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信