化疗啮齿动物模型执行功能缺陷的元分析。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Weiye Chen, Ian N. Johnston
{"title":"化疗啮齿动物模型执行功能缺陷的元分析。","authors":"Weiye Chen,&nbsp;Ian N. Johnston","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy commonly encounter cognitive changes, particularly in executive functions (EFs). EFs support goal-directed behaviours, with EF deficits implicated in various neurocognitive impairments. We conducted five meta-analyses of the rodent models to investigate the impact of chemotherapy across five EF domains. A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO yielded 56 eligible papers. Our findings supported the clinical literature suggesting the selective impact of chemotherapy on different EF domains. Specifically, chemotherapy-treated animals performed significantly more poorly than controls in tasks assessing working memory, behavioural flexibility, and problem-solving, with no significant group differences in inhibition or attention. Subgroup analyses revealed that alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, and combination therapies were strongly associated with working memory deficits, whereas mitotic inhibitors were not. Rodent species, strain, age, sex, number of treatments, and time of behavioural assessment since the end of treatment did not moderate the drug effect on any assessed EF domains. To increase the generalisability and translational validity of the results, the overall reporting quality of animal studies needs to be improved with more details on randomisation, blinding, sample sizes, and criteria for animal exclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106131"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analyses of executive function deficits in chemotherapy-treated rodent models\",\"authors\":\"Weiye Chen,&nbsp;Ian N. Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy commonly encounter cognitive changes, particularly in executive functions (EFs). EFs support goal-directed behaviours, with EF deficits implicated in various neurocognitive impairments. We conducted five meta-analyses of the rodent models to investigate the impact of chemotherapy across five EF domains. A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO yielded 56 eligible papers. Our findings supported the clinical literature suggesting the selective impact of chemotherapy on different EF domains. Specifically, chemotherapy-treated animals performed significantly more poorly than controls in tasks assessing working memory, behavioural flexibility, and problem-solving, with no significant group differences in inhibition or attention. Subgroup analyses revealed that alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, and combination therapies were strongly associated with working memory deficits, whereas mitotic inhibitors were not. Rodent species, strain, age, sex, number of treatments, and time of behavioural assessment since the end of treatment did not moderate the drug effect on any assessed EF domains. To increase the generalisability and translational validity of the results, the overall reporting quality of animal studies needs to be improved with more details on randomisation, blinding, sample sizes, and criteria for animal exclusions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meta-analyses of executive function deficits in chemotherapy-treated rodent models

Meta-analyses of executive function deficits in chemotherapy-treated rodent models
People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy commonly encounter cognitive changes, particularly in executive functions (EFs). EFs support goal-directed behaviours, with EF deficits implicated in various neurocognitive impairments. We conducted five meta-analyses of the rodent models to investigate the impact of chemotherapy across five EF domains. A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO yielded 56 eligible papers. Our findings supported the clinical literature suggesting the selective impact of chemotherapy on different EF domains. Specifically, chemotherapy-treated animals performed significantly more poorly than controls in tasks assessing working memory, behavioural flexibility, and problem-solving, with no significant group differences in inhibition or attention. Subgroup analyses revealed that alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, and combination therapies were strongly associated with working memory deficits, whereas mitotic inhibitors were not. Rodent species, strain, age, sex, number of treatments, and time of behavioural assessment since the end of treatment did not moderate the drug effect on any assessed EF domains. To increase the generalisability and translational validity of the results, the overall reporting quality of animal studies needs to be improved with more details on randomisation, blinding, sample sizes, and criteria for animal exclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信