{"title":"化疗啮齿动物模型执行功能缺陷的元分析。","authors":"Weiye Chen, Ian N. Johnston","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy commonly encounter cognitive changes, particularly in executive functions (EFs). EFs support goal-directed behaviours, with EF deficits implicated in various neurocognitive impairments. We conducted five meta-analyses of the rodent models to investigate the impact of chemotherapy across five EF domains. A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO yielded 56 eligible papers. Our findings supported the clinical literature suggesting the selective impact of chemotherapy on different EF domains. Specifically, chemotherapy-treated animals performed significantly more poorly than controls in tasks assessing working memory, behavioural flexibility, and problem-solving, with no significant group differences in inhibition or attention. Subgroup analyses revealed that alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, and combination therapies were strongly associated with working memory deficits, whereas mitotic inhibitors were not. Rodent species, strain, age, sex, number of treatments, and time of behavioural assessment since the end of treatment did not moderate the drug effect on any assessed EF domains. To increase the generalisability and translational validity of the results, the overall reporting quality of animal studies needs to be improved with more details on randomisation, blinding, sample sizes, and criteria for animal exclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106131"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analyses of executive function deficits in chemotherapy-treated rodent models\",\"authors\":\"Weiye Chen, Ian N. Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy commonly encounter cognitive changes, particularly in executive functions (EFs). EFs support goal-directed behaviours, with EF deficits implicated in various neurocognitive impairments. We conducted five meta-analyses of the rodent models to investigate the impact of chemotherapy across five EF domains. A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO yielded 56 eligible papers. Our findings supported the clinical literature suggesting the selective impact of chemotherapy on different EF domains. Specifically, chemotherapy-treated animals performed significantly more poorly than controls in tasks assessing working memory, behavioural flexibility, and problem-solving, with no significant group differences in inhibition or attention. Subgroup analyses revealed that alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, and combination therapies were strongly associated with working memory deficits, whereas mitotic inhibitors were not. Rodent species, strain, age, sex, number of treatments, and time of behavioural assessment since the end of treatment did not moderate the drug effect on any assessed EF domains. To increase the generalisability and translational validity of the results, the overall reporting quality of animal studies needs to be improved with more details on randomisation, blinding, sample sizes, and criteria for animal exclusions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-analyses of executive function deficits in chemotherapy-treated rodent models
People diagnosed with cancer who undergo chemotherapy commonly encounter cognitive changes, particularly in executive functions (EFs). EFs support goal-directed behaviours, with EF deficits implicated in various neurocognitive impairments. We conducted five meta-analyses of the rodent models to investigate the impact of chemotherapy across five EF domains. A systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO yielded 56 eligible papers. Our findings supported the clinical literature suggesting the selective impact of chemotherapy on different EF domains. Specifically, chemotherapy-treated animals performed significantly more poorly than controls in tasks assessing working memory, behavioural flexibility, and problem-solving, with no significant group differences in inhibition or attention. Subgroup analyses revealed that alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, and combination therapies were strongly associated with working memory deficits, whereas mitotic inhibitors were not. Rodent species, strain, age, sex, number of treatments, and time of behavioural assessment since the end of treatment did not moderate the drug effect on any assessed EF domains. To increase the generalisability and translational validity of the results, the overall reporting quality of animal studies needs to be improved with more details on randomisation, blinding, sample sizes, and criteria for animal exclusions.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.