Graham Danzer, Emily Gottfried, Kymmalett Ross, Tobias Wasser
{"title":"关于性累犯和治疗因素的荟萃分析的叙述性回顾:对法医的影响。","authors":"Graham Danzer, Emily Gottfried, Kymmalett Ross, Tobias Wasser","doi":"10.1037/ort0000846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a historical background and narrative review of meta-analyses on sex offender sexual recidivism and treatment, as anchor points for forensic mental health testimony in civil commitment hearings. Themes flowing from the meta-analyses included sexual recidivism for adults and juveniles, jurisdictional differences, treatment versus no treatment, empirically supported risk factors, operational definition of recidivism, offense type, motivation, research design, length of follow-up, diversity considerations, and treatment model, modality, specialization, and setting. We show where meta-analytic results appear to converge and diverge. We also present important null findings, findings from individual studies, and limitations. Our review suggests an examiner's opinion in favor of commitment may be more persuasive when anchored in the individual's history of repeat sexual offending, sexual deviancy, antisociality, and dropout from treatment. Procommitment opinions may be further supported via mention of longer follow-ups generally predicting more sexual recidivism, potentially higher numbers of unreported sex crimes, and the limitations of treatment and rehabilitation studies. An examiner's opinion in disfavor to commitment can be anchored in generally low rates of sexual reoffending, most meta-analyses supporting substantial treatment benefit even for high-risk individuals, studies suggesting rehabilitation failures may have much to do with poor quality treatment, inadequate research on cultural minority individuals, and perhaps null findings on voluntary versus involuntary treatment and the operational definition of sexual recidivism. Limitations of our recommended approach include that meta-analyses have a high proportion of redundant and older samples, often use nonequivalent statistical procedures, and may overlook important findings from individual studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A narrative review of meta-analyses on sexual recidivism and treatment factors: Implications for forensic examiners.\",\"authors\":\"Graham Danzer, Emily Gottfried, Kymmalett Ross, Tobias Wasser\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ort0000846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We present a historical background and narrative review of meta-analyses on sex offender sexual recidivism and treatment, as anchor points for forensic mental health testimony in civil commitment hearings. Themes flowing from the meta-analyses included sexual recidivism for adults and juveniles, jurisdictional differences, treatment versus no treatment, empirically supported risk factors, operational definition of recidivism, offense type, motivation, research design, length of follow-up, diversity considerations, and treatment model, modality, specialization, and setting. We show where meta-analytic results appear to converge and diverge. We also present important null findings, findings from individual studies, and limitations. Our review suggests an examiner's opinion in favor of commitment may be more persuasive when anchored in the individual's history of repeat sexual offending, sexual deviancy, antisociality, and dropout from treatment. Procommitment opinions may be further supported via mention of longer follow-ups generally predicting more sexual recidivism, potentially higher numbers of unreported sex crimes, and the limitations of treatment and rehabilitation studies. An examiner's opinion in disfavor to commitment can be anchored in generally low rates of sexual reoffending, most meta-analyses supporting substantial treatment benefit even for high-risk individuals, studies suggesting rehabilitation failures may have much to do with poor quality treatment, inadequate research on cultural minority individuals, and perhaps null findings on voluntary versus involuntary treatment and the operational definition of sexual recidivism. Limitations of our recommended approach include that meta-analyses have a high proportion of redundant and older samples, often use nonequivalent statistical procedures, and may overlook important findings from individual studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000846\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对性犯罪者性累犯及其治疗的荟萃分析进行了历史背景和叙事回顾,作为民事承诺听证会中法医心理健康证词的锚点。荟萃分析的主题包括成人和青少年的性再犯、管辖权差异、治疗与不治疗、经验支持的风险因素、再犯的操作定义、犯罪类型、动机、研究设计、随访时间、多样性考虑、治疗模式、方式、专业化和环境。我们展示了元分析结果在哪里出现收敛和发散。我们也提出了重要的无效发现、个别研究的发现和局限性。我们的研究表明,当一个人有重复性侵犯、性变态、反社会和退出治疗的历史时,主考官支持承诺的观点可能更有说服力。更长的随访通常预示着更多的性再犯,潜在的更高数量的未报告性犯罪,以及治疗和康复研究的局限性,这可能进一步支持了预承诺的观点。审查员不赞成承诺的观点可以固定在通常较低的性再犯罪率上,大多数荟萃分析支持即使对高风险个体也有实质性的治疗效果,研究表明康复失败可能与低质量的治疗有很大关系,对文化少数群体的研究不足,在自愿与非自愿治疗和性累犯的操作定义上可能没有发现。我们推荐的方法的局限性包括,荟萃分析有很高比例的冗余和旧样本,经常使用不等效的统计程序,并且可能忽略个别研究的重要发现。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
A narrative review of meta-analyses on sexual recidivism and treatment factors: Implications for forensic examiners.
We present a historical background and narrative review of meta-analyses on sex offender sexual recidivism and treatment, as anchor points for forensic mental health testimony in civil commitment hearings. Themes flowing from the meta-analyses included sexual recidivism for adults and juveniles, jurisdictional differences, treatment versus no treatment, empirically supported risk factors, operational definition of recidivism, offense type, motivation, research design, length of follow-up, diversity considerations, and treatment model, modality, specialization, and setting. We show where meta-analytic results appear to converge and diverge. We also present important null findings, findings from individual studies, and limitations. Our review suggests an examiner's opinion in favor of commitment may be more persuasive when anchored in the individual's history of repeat sexual offending, sexual deviancy, antisociality, and dropout from treatment. Procommitment opinions may be further supported via mention of longer follow-ups generally predicting more sexual recidivism, potentially higher numbers of unreported sex crimes, and the limitations of treatment and rehabilitation studies. An examiner's opinion in disfavor to commitment can be anchored in generally low rates of sexual reoffending, most meta-analyses supporting substantial treatment benefit even for high-risk individuals, studies suggesting rehabilitation failures may have much to do with poor quality treatment, inadequate research on cultural minority individuals, and perhaps null findings on voluntary versus involuntary treatment and the operational definition of sexual recidivism. Limitations of our recommended approach include that meta-analyses have a high proportion of redundant and older samples, often use nonequivalent statistical procedures, and may overlook important findings from individual studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.