管理年轻人和老年人日常活动的数字和模拟方法。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rachel E Mis, Jared F Benge, Jennifer L Thompson Kamar, Troy A Webber, Steven Paul Woods
{"title":"管理年轻人和老年人日常活动的数字和模拟方法。","authors":"Rachel E Mis, Jared F Benge, Jennifer L Thompson Kamar, Troy A Webber, Steven Paul Woods","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2487151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Technology is increasingly critical for performing daily activities, which has multiple implications for the practice of clinical neuropsychology. This study sought to characterize use of digital and traditional analog approaches to instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) among samples of younger and older adults and identify cognitive factors associated with self-perceived errors in using digital approaches. <b>Method</b>: Sixty community-dwelling adults aged 50 and older and 46 younger healthy adults aged 35 and younger completed a telephone-based research evaluation including demographics, mood, general health, and neurocognitive functioning. Participants also completed a questionnaire on frequency of usage and perceived errors in completing nine iADLs <i>via</i> digital and analog approaches. <b>Results</b>: Participants overall reported using digital more frequently than analog approaches at a very large effect size, with a digital preference most obvious for activities such as navigation and financial account management. The younger group reported using digital approaches more frequently than the older group at a large effect size. Better cognitive performance was associated with less frequent use of analog, but not digital, approaches. Furthermore, better cognition was associated with moderately less frequent self-reported digital errors in the older, but not the younger, groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Younger and older adults are increasingly adopting digital approaches to performing daily tasks. This highlights both the need and opportunity for the field of clinical neuropsychology to better understand how technology impacts the ability to perform daily tasks and develop assessment tools that adequately capture how patients are functioning in a digitally enriched environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital and analog approaches for managing daily activities in younger and older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel E Mis, Jared F Benge, Jennifer L Thompson Kamar, Troy A Webber, Steven Paul Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2487151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: Technology is increasingly critical for performing daily activities, which has multiple implications for the practice of clinical neuropsychology. This study sought to characterize use of digital and traditional analog approaches to instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) among samples of younger and older adults and identify cognitive factors associated with self-perceived errors in using digital approaches. <b>Method</b>: Sixty community-dwelling adults aged 50 and older and 46 younger healthy adults aged 35 and younger completed a telephone-based research evaluation including demographics, mood, general health, and neurocognitive functioning. Participants also completed a questionnaire on frequency of usage and perceived errors in completing nine iADLs <i>via</i> digital and analog approaches. <b>Results</b>: Participants overall reported using digital more frequently than analog approaches at a very large effect size, with a digital preference most obvious for activities such as navigation and financial account management. The younger group reported using digital approaches more frequently than the older group at a large effect size. Better cognitive performance was associated with less frequent use of analog, but not digital, approaches. Furthermore, better cognition was associated with moderately less frequent self-reported digital errors in the older, but not the younger, groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Younger and older adults are increasingly adopting digital approaches to performing daily tasks. This highlights both the need and opportunity for the field of clinical neuropsychology to better understand how technology impacts the ability to perform daily tasks and develop assessment tools that adequately capture how patients are functioning in a digitally enriched environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2487151\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2487151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:技术在日常活动中越来越重要,这对临床神经心理学的实践有多重影响。本研究试图在年轻人和老年人样本中描述使用数字和传统模拟方法进行日常生活工具活动(iadl)的特征,并确定与使用数字方法时自我感知错误相关的认知因素。方法:60名50岁及以上的社区居民和46名35岁及以下的年轻健康成年人完成了一项基于电话的研究评估,包括人口统计学、情绪、一般健康和神经认知功能。参与者还完成了一份关于通过数字和模拟方法完成9个iadl的使用频率和感知错误的问卷。结果:总体而言,参与者报告在非常大的效应量下使用数字方法比模拟方法更频繁,在导航和财务账户管理等活动中,数字偏好最为明显。在较大的效应量下,年轻的一组比年长的一组更频繁地使用数字方法。更好的认知表现与较少使用模拟方法有关,而不是数字方法。此外,在老年人中,更好的认知能力与自我报告的数字错误的频率相对较低有关,而在年轻人中则没有。结论:年轻人和老年人越来越多地采用数字方式来完成日常任务。这突出了临床神经心理学领域的需求和机会,以更好地了解技术如何影响执行日常任务的能力,并开发评估工具,以充分捕捉患者在数字化丰富的环境中如何运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital and analog approaches for managing daily activities in younger and older adults.

Objective: Technology is increasingly critical for performing daily activities, which has multiple implications for the practice of clinical neuropsychology. This study sought to characterize use of digital and traditional analog approaches to instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) among samples of younger and older adults and identify cognitive factors associated with self-perceived errors in using digital approaches. Method: Sixty community-dwelling adults aged 50 and older and 46 younger healthy adults aged 35 and younger completed a telephone-based research evaluation including demographics, mood, general health, and neurocognitive functioning. Participants also completed a questionnaire on frequency of usage and perceived errors in completing nine iADLs via digital and analog approaches. Results: Participants overall reported using digital more frequently than analog approaches at a very large effect size, with a digital preference most obvious for activities such as navigation and financial account management. The younger group reported using digital approaches more frequently than the older group at a large effect size. Better cognitive performance was associated with less frequent use of analog, but not digital, approaches. Furthermore, better cognition was associated with moderately less frequent self-reported digital errors in the older, but not the younger, groups. Conclusions: Younger and older adults are increasingly adopting digital approaches to performing daily tasks. This highlights both the need and opportunity for the field of clinical neuropsychology to better understand how technology impacts the ability to perform daily tasks and develop assessment tools that adequately capture how patients are functioning in a digitally enriched environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信