临床牙科卫生学家实施 2017 年牙周和种植体周围疾病分类。

Q2 Dentistry
Qian Li, Linda D Boyd, Lori Giblin-Scanlon, Jared Vineyard, Kristeen Perry
{"title":"临床牙科卫生学家实施 2017 年牙周和种植体周围疾病分类。","authors":"Qian Li, Linda D Boyd, Lori Giblin-Scanlon, Jared Vineyard, Kristeen Perry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions introduced a new framework for categorizing periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions in 2017. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current implementation practice and factors impacting implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by clinical dental hygienists.<b>Methods</b> Survey research was conducted in an online format with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists recruited via social media and snowball sampling (n= 255). Components of the survey included personal, environmental, and behavioral factors along with intention to implement the classification of periodontal staging and grading system into patient care. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression.<b>Results</b> The survey completion rate was 71% (n=181). Environmental factors (β=.352, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.469, <i>p</i><.001) were positively associated with the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system. In contrast, behavioral factors (β=.011, <i>p</i>=.889) and highest degree earned (β=.079, <i>p</i>=.151) were not significant predictors. For the intention to attend continuing education courses on the new classification system, both behavioral factors (β=.388, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.299, <i>p</i>=.003) were significant. However, environmental factors (β=-.048, <i>p</i>=.535), years in practice (β=-.041, <i>p</i>=.506), and familiarity (β=.066, <i>p</i>=.402) were not significant predictors.<b>Conclusion</b> Results demonstrated that both environmental and personal factors significantly influenced the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system among clinical dental hygienists. To enhance integration, efforts should be made to focus on improving personal motivation and addressing the environmental/workplace factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"99 2","pages":"9-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Li, Linda D Boyd, Lori Giblin-Scanlon, Jared Vineyard, Kristeen Perry\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions introduced a new framework for categorizing periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions in 2017. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current implementation practice and factors impacting implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by clinical dental hygienists.<b>Methods</b> Survey research was conducted in an online format with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists recruited via social media and snowball sampling (n= 255). Components of the survey included personal, environmental, and behavioral factors along with intention to implement the classification of periodontal staging and grading system into patient care. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression.<b>Results</b> The survey completion rate was 71% (n=181). Environmental factors (β=.352, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.469, <i>p</i><.001) were positively associated with the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system. In contrast, behavioral factors (β=.011, <i>p</i>=.889) and highest degree earned (β=.079, <i>p</i>=.151) were not significant predictors. For the intention to attend continuing education courses on the new classification system, both behavioral factors (β=.388, <i>p</i><.001) and personal factors (β=.299, <i>p</i>=.003) were significant. However, environmental factors (β=-.048, <i>p</i>=.535), years in practice (β=-.041, <i>p</i>=.506), and familiarity (β=.066, <i>p</i>=.402) were not significant predictors.<b>Conclusion</b> Results demonstrated that both environmental and personal factors significantly influenced the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system among clinical dental hygienists. To enhance integration, efforts should be made to focus on improving personal motivation and addressing the environmental/workplace factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association\",\"volume\":\"99 2\",\"pages\":\"9-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年世界牙周和种植周疾病和病症分类研讨会引入了牙周和种植周疾病和病症分类的新框架。本研究的目的是调查临床口腔卫生员实施2017年牙周和种植周疾病分类的现状和影响因素。方法采用非概率在线调查方式,通过社交媒体和滚雪球抽样方式,对临床口腔卫生员进行非概率抽样(n= 255)。调查的组成部分包括个人、环境和行为因素,以及在患者护理中实施牙周分期和分级系统分类的意图。数据分析包括描述性统计、相关分析和回归分析。结果调查完成率71%(181例)。环境因素(β=。352, ppp=.889)和获得的最高学位(β=。079, p=.151)无显著预测因子。对于参加新分类体系继续教育课程的意向,行为因素(β=。388, pp=.003)。然而,环境因素(β=-。048, p=.535),从业年数(β=-。041, p=.506),熟悉度(β=。066, p=.402)无显著预测因子。结论环境因素和个人因素对临床口腔卫生员实施2017牙周病分类制度的意愿均有显著影响。为了加强整合,应努力集中于提高个人动机和解决环境/工作场所因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by Clinical Dental Hygienists.

Purpose The World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions introduced a new framework for categorizing periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions in 2017. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current implementation practice and factors impacting implementation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases by clinical dental hygienists.Methods Survey research was conducted in an online format with a non-probability sample of clinical dental hygienists recruited via social media and snowball sampling (n= 255). Components of the survey included personal, environmental, and behavioral factors along with intention to implement the classification of periodontal staging and grading system into patient care. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression.Results The survey completion rate was 71% (n=181). Environmental factors (β=.352, p<.001) and personal factors (β=.469, p<.001) were positively associated with the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system. In contrast, behavioral factors (β=.011, p=.889) and highest degree earned (β=.079, p=.151) were not significant predictors. For the intention to attend continuing education courses on the new classification system, both behavioral factors (β=.388, p<.001) and personal factors (β=.299, p=.003) were significant. However, environmental factors (β=-.048, p=.535), years in practice (β=-.041, p=.506), and familiarity (β=.066, p=.402) were not significant predictors.Conclusion Results demonstrated that both environmental and personal factors significantly influenced the intention to implement the 2017 periodontal disease classification system among clinical dental hygienists. To enhance integration, efforts should be made to focus on improving personal motivation and addressing the environmental/workplace factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信