{"title":"子宫内膜准备方案不会影响冷冻解冻胚胎移植治疗慢性子宫内膜炎的结果。","authors":"Xiao Shi, Shuyi Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intended to investigate the potential effects of endometrial preparation procedures on the results of subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in infertile women with chronic endometritis (CE) following a single course of antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2020 to December 2023, 773 infertile patients participated in a retrospective research. CD138 was immunostained in endometrial tissues taken during the proliferative phase. CE was suggested by the presence of CD138-positive cells in the stromal cells. Oral antibiotics were administered to every patient with a CE diagnosis. After one course of drug treatment, patients had endometrial preparation and frozen embryo transfers. This study compared the impact of different endometrial preparation strategies on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four regimens, hormone replacement treatment (HRT), ovulation induction, natural cycle, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-HRT (GnRH agonist-HRT), did not significantly alter the outcome of pregnancy in patients with CE. Compared to other groups, the ovulation induction cycle group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. In addition, the miscarriage rate is lower compared to other populations. Patients with treated CE who received HRT, GnRH agonist-HRT, ovulation induction cycle, and natural cycle did not differ substantially (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with treated CE did not see any change in pregnancy outcomes as a result of endometrial preparation procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endometrial preparation protocols did not impact outcomes after frozen-thaw embryo transfer for chronic endometritis treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Shi, Shuyi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intended to investigate the potential effects of endometrial preparation procedures on the results of subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in infertile women with chronic endometritis (CE) following a single course of antibiotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2020 to December 2023, 773 infertile patients participated in a retrospective research. CD138 was immunostained in endometrial tissues taken during the proliferative phase. CE was suggested by the presence of CD138-positive cells in the stromal cells. Oral antibiotics were administered to every patient with a CE diagnosis. After one course of drug treatment, patients had endometrial preparation and frozen embryo transfers. This study compared the impact of different endometrial preparation strategies on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four regimens, hormone replacement treatment (HRT), ovulation induction, natural cycle, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-HRT (GnRH agonist-HRT), did not significantly alter the outcome of pregnancy in patients with CE. Compared to other groups, the ovulation induction cycle group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. In addition, the miscarriage rate is lower compared to other populations. Patients with treated CE who received HRT, GnRH agonist-HRT, ovulation induction cycle, and natural cycle did not differ substantially (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with treated CE did not see any change in pregnancy outcomes as a result of endometrial preparation procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00363-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:旨在研究子宫内膜准备程序对慢性子宫内膜炎(CE)不孕妇女在接受一个疗程的抗生素治疗后的后续冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期结果的潜在影响:2020年7月至2023年12月,773名不孕患者参与了一项回顾性研究。对增殖期的子宫内膜组织进行了 CD138 免疫染色。基质细胞中出现 CD138 阳性细胞即为 CE。对每位确诊为 CE 的患者都口服了抗生素。一个疗程的药物治疗后,患者进行子宫内膜制备和冷冻胚胎移植。这项研究比较了不同子宫内膜制备策略对妊娠结果的影响:结果:激素替代治疗(HRT)、促排卵、自然周期和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂-HRT(GnRH 激动剂-HRT)这四种方案对 CE 患者的妊娠结果没有显著影响。与其他组相比,促排卵周期组的临床妊娠率和胚胎植入率更高。此外,流产率也低于其他人群。接受HRT、GnRH激动剂-HRT、促排卵周期和自然周期治疗的CE患者并无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:经过治疗的 CE 患者的妊娠结局不会因子宫内膜准备程序而发生任何变化。
Endometrial preparation protocols did not impact outcomes after frozen-thaw embryo transfer for chronic endometritis treatment.
Background: Intended to investigate the potential effects of endometrial preparation procedures on the results of subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in infertile women with chronic endometritis (CE) following a single course of antibiotic therapy.
Methods: From July 2020 to December 2023, 773 infertile patients participated in a retrospective research. CD138 was immunostained in endometrial tissues taken during the proliferative phase. CE was suggested by the presence of CD138-positive cells in the stromal cells. Oral antibiotics were administered to every patient with a CE diagnosis. After one course of drug treatment, patients had endometrial preparation and frozen embryo transfers. This study compared the impact of different endometrial preparation strategies on pregnancy outcomes.
Results: Four regimens, hormone replacement treatment (HRT), ovulation induction, natural cycle, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-HRT (GnRH agonist-HRT), did not significantly alter the outcome of pregnancy in patients with CE. Compared to other groups, the ovulation induction cycle group had a higher clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. In addition, the miscarriage rate is lower compared to other populations. Patients with treated CE who received HRT, GnRH agonist-HRT, ovulation induction cycle, and natural cycle did not differ substantially (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Patients with treated CE did not see any change in pregnancy outcomes as a result of endometrial preparation procedures.