目标指向性伸手动作中表现出的选择史偏差的个体差异特征。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Fan Zhang, Mukesh Makwana, Dietmar Heinke, Joo-Hyun Song
{"title":"目标指向性伸手动作中表现出的选择史偏差的个体差异特征。","authors":"Fan Zhang, Mukesh Makwana, Dietmar Heinke, Joo-Hyun Song","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Everyday interactions with a complex environment often demand selecting a single target among multiple distractors. A recent framework of attentional control suggests that object selection is influenced not only by perceptual salience and current goals but also by selection history. Here, we examine how this interplay between target and distractor history manifests in individual differences in target selection for goal-directed reaching movements. We employ a priming-of-popout (PoP) paradigm combined with continuous tracking of reaching movements. Participants reach for an odd-colored target among homogeneous distractors while we systematically manipulate the sequence of target and distractor colors from one trial to the next. We record behavioral data such as reach trajectory, initiation latency, and movement time, and calculate attraction scores using the single target reach trajectory as the baseline to evaluate performance across six conditions. For each participant, we determine their maximum attraction score and its timing for each condition. Subsequently, using k-means clustering and t-SNE analysis identifies four distinct clusters as subgroups, indicating different strategies in attentional and action selection with varying degrees of influence from previous target versus distractor feature repetition and their distinct contributions to PoP. Our findings underscore that previous selection history triggers a dynamic interaction between target facilitation and distractor inhibition, resulting in individual differences in target selection strategies for goal-directed actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing individual differences in selection history bias manifested in goal-directed reaching movements.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Zhang, Mukesh Makwana, Dietmar Heinke, Joo-Hyun Song\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Everyday interactions with a complex environment often demand selecting a single target among multiple distractors. A recent framework of attentional control suggests that object selection is influenced not only by perceptual salience and current goals but also by selection history. Here, we examine how this interplay between target and distractor history manifests in individual differences in target selection for goal-directed reaching movements. We employ a priming-of-popout (PoP) paradigm combined with continuous tracking of reaching movements. Participants reach for an odd-colored target among homogeneous distractors while we systematically manipulate the sequence of target and distractor colors from one trial to the next. We record behavioral data such as reach trajectory, initiation latency, and movement time, and calculate attraction scores using the single target reach trajectory as the baseline to evaluate performance across six conditions. For each participant, we determine their maximum attraction score and its timing for each condition. Subsequently, using k-means clustering and t-SNE analysis identifies four distinct clusters as subgroups, indicating different strategies in attentional and action selection with varying degrees of influence from previous target versus distractor feature repetition and their distinct contributions to PoP. Our findings underscore that previous selection history triggers a dynamic interaction between target facilitation and distractor inhibition, resulting in individual differences in target selection strategies for goal-directed actions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03068-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与复杂环境的日常互动通常需要在多个干扰物中选择单个目标。最近的一个注意控制框架表明,对象选择不仅受到知觉显著性和当前目标的影响,还受到选择历史的影响。在这里,我们研究了目标和干扰物之间的相互作用是如何在目标导向到达运动中目标选择的个体差异中表现出来的。我们采用了弹出启动(PoP)模式,并结合了对到达动作的连续跟踪。被试在同质干扰物中选择一个奇数色的目标,而我们从一个试验到下一个试验系统地操纵目标和干扰物的颜色顺序。我们记录了诸如到达轨迹、起始延迟和移动时间等行为数据,并使用单个目标到达轨迹作为基线计算吸引力分数,以评估六种条件下的表现。对于每个参与者,我们确定他们在每种情况下的最大吸引力得分和时间。随后,使用k-means聚类和t-SNE分析确定了四个不同的聚类作为子组,表明注意和行动选择的不同策略受到先前目标和分心物特征重复的不同程度的影响,以及它们对PoP的不同贡献。我们的研究结果强调,先前的选择历史触发了目标促进和干扰物抑制之间的动态相互作用,导致目标导向行为的目标选择策略的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing individual differences in selection history bias manifested in goal-directed reaching movements.

Everyday interactions with a complex environment often demand selecting a single target among multiple distractors. A recent framework of attentional control suggests that object selection is influenced not only by perceptual salience and current goals but also by selection history. Here, we examine how this interplay between target and distractor history manifests in individual differences in target selection for goal-directed reaching movements. We employ a priming-of-popout (PoP) paradigm combined with continuous tracking of reaching movements. Participants reach for an odd-colored target among homogeneous distractors while we systematically manipulate the sequence of target and distractor colors from one trial to the next. We record behavioral data such as reach trajectory, initiation latency, and movement time, and calculate attraction scores using the single target reach trajectory as the baseline to evaluate performance across six conditions. For each participant, we determine their maximum attraction score and its timing for each condition. Subsequently, using k-means clustering and t-SNE analysis identifies four distinct clusters as subgroups, indicating different strategies in attentional and action selection with varying degrees of influence from previous target versus distractor feature repetition and their distinct contributions to PoP. Our findings underscore that previous selection history triggers a dynamic interaction between target facilitation and distractor inhibition, resulting in individual differences in target selection strategies for goal-directed actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信