Seth E Tichenor, Bridget Walsh, Katelyn L Gerwin, J Scott Yaruss
{"title":"作为口吃预期机制的重复性消极思考","authors":"Seth E Tichenor, Bridget Walsh, Katelyn L Gerwin, J Scott Yaruss","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the context of stuttering, <i>anticipation</i> refers to the sensation that one may soon stutter. Although anticipation is widely reported, much is still unknown about how the phenomenon develops and how people respond to it as they live their lives. To address these gaps, this study specified the relationship between repetitive negative thinking (RNT), anticipation, and anticipation responses. This study also determined whether individual differences in a person's <i>goal when speaking</i> (i.e., speaking fluently or not stuttering vs. stuttering openly) predicted the different ways people respond to anticipation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five hundred and ten stutterers (427 adults who stutter, ages 18-86 years, and 83 adolescents who stutter, ages 10-18 years) answered questions about anticipation, their responses to anticipation, how frequently they engage in RNT, and what their <i>goals when speaking</i> are.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed that responses to anticipation can be described in terms of two factors: <i>avoidance</i> and <i>acceptance</i>. <i>Avoidance</i> responses to anticipation were more common than <i>acceptance</i> in both groups. Adults and adolescents were more likely to experience anticipation and respond with avoidance behaviors if they more frequently engage in RNT or less often have the <i>goal when speaking</i> of openly stuttering. Data also supported and extended evidence that anticipation is commonly experienced in adolescents and adults who stutter.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings extend the understanding of how anticipation and anticipation responses may develop based on an individuals' engagement with RNT and goals when speaking. The relationship between RNT and anticipation underscores the need for future investigations focusing on preventing the development of negative responses to anticipation via holistic therapy.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28635719.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"2236-2258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetitive Negative Thinking as a Mechanism of Stuttering Anticipation.\",\"authors\":\"Seth E Tichenor, Bridget Walsh, Katelyn L Gerwin, J Scott Yaruss\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the context of stuttering, <i>anticipation</i> refers to the sensation that one may soon stutter. Although anticipation is widely reported, much is still unknown about how the phenomenon develops and how people respond to it as they live their lives. To address these gaps, this study specified the relationship between repetitive negative thinking (RNT), anticipation, and anticipation responses. This study also determined whether individual differences in a person's <i>goal when speaking</i> (i.e., speaking fluently or not stuttering vs. stuttering openly) predicted the different ways people respond to anticipation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five hundred and ten stutterers (427 adults who stutter, ages 18-86 years, and 83 adolescents who stutter, ages 10-18 years) answered questions about anticipation, their responses to anticipation, how frequently they engage in RNT, and what their <i>goals when speaking</i> are.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed that responses to anticipation can be described in terms of two factors: <i>avoidance</i> and <i>acceptance</i>. <i>Avoidance</i> responses to anticipation were more common than <i>acceptance</i> in both groups. Adults and adolescents were more likely to experience anticipation and respond with avoidance behaviors if they more frequently engage in RNT or less often have the <i>goal when speaking</i> of openly stuttering. Data also supported and extended evidence that anticipation is commonly experienced in adolescents and adults who stutter.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings extend the understanding of how anticipation and anticipation responses may develop based on an individuals' engagement with RNT and goals when speaking. The relationship between RNT and anticipation underscores the need for future investigations focusing on preventing the development of negative responses to anticipation via holistic therapy.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28635719.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2236-2258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Repetitive Negative Thinking as a Mechanism of Stuttering Anticipation.
Purpose: In the context of stuttering, anticipation refers to the sensation that one may soon stutter. Although anticipation is widely reported, much is still unknown about how the phenomenon develops and how people respond to it as they live their lives. To address these gaps, this study specified the relationship between repetitive negative thinking (RNT), anticipation, and anticipation responses. This study also determined whether individual differences in a person's goal when speaking (i.e., speaking fluently or not stuttering vs. stuttering openly) predicted the different ways people respond to anticipation.
Method: Five hundred and ten stutterers (427 adults who stutter, ages 18-86 years, and 83 adolescents who stutter, ages 10-18 years) answered questions about anticipation, their responses to anticipation, how frequently they engage in RNT, and what their goals when speaking are.
Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed that responses to anticipation can be described in terms of two factors: avoidance and acceptance. Avoidance responses to anticipation were more common than acceptance in both groups. Adults and adolescents were more likely to experience anticipation and respond with avoidance behaviors if they more frequently engage in RNT or less often have the goal when speaking of openly stuttering. Data also supported and extended evidence that anticipation is commonly experienced in adolescents and adults who stutter.
Discussion: Findings extend the understanding of how anticipation and anticipation responses may develop based on an individuals' engagement with RNT and goals when speaking. The relationship between RNT and anticipation underscores the need for future investigations focusing on preventing the development of negative responses to anticipation via holistic therapy.
期刊介绍:
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.