Mehran Ghasemi, Adam M Fullenkamp, Jason A Whitfield
{"title":"高努力说话方式的顺序效应在不同会话之间的一致性。","authors":"Mehran Ghasemi, Adam M Fullenkamp, Jason A Whitfield","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this investigation was to determine the extent to which instruction order impacts the clear and loud speech response and to examine the consistency of the clear and loud speech response across two sessions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Acoustic and kinematic data from sentences produced in habitual, loud, and clear speech styles were collected from participants assigned in two groups: a Clear-Loud group (order: habitual, clear, loud) and a Loud-Clear group (order: habitual, loud, clear styles). Participants performed the same protocol order during two sessions scheduled 1 week apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that there were no significant differences between groups for speech intensity, lip aperture range, and speech rate in the habitual style. In both sessions, talkers in the Clear-Loud group exhibited a modest increase in speech intensity between the habitual and clear style and a larger increase between the clear and loud style. Alternatively, talkers in the Loud-Clear group exhibited no differences in speech intensity between the loud and clear styles, retaining the increases associated with the loud style during clear speech. Additionally, talkers in the Loud-Clear group exhibited a more graded change in lip aperture range and speech rate between the habitual, loud, and clear speech styles. In contrast, those in the Clear-Loud group retained the changes in lip aperture range and speech rate that were observed in the clear style when performing the loud style.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some between-participant variation in the observed trends, these data suggest that most talkers retained characteristics of the previously performed higher effort style in subsequent style.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of Order Effects in Higher Effort Speaking Styles Between Sessions.\",\"authors\":\"Mehran Ghasemi, Adam M Fullenkamp, Jason A Whitfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this investigation was to determine the extent to which instruction order impacts the clear and loud speech response and to examine the consistency of the clear and loud speech response across two sessions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Acoustic and kinematic data from sentences produced in habitual, loud, and clear speech styles were collected from participants assigned in two groups: a Clear-Loud group (order: habitual, clear, loud) and a Loud-Clear group (order: habitual, loud, clear styles). Participants performed the same protocol order during two sessions scheduled 1 week apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that there were no significant differences between groups for speech intensity, lip aperture range, and speech rate in the habitual style. In both sessions, talkers in the Clear-Loud group exhibited a modest increase in speech intensity between the habitual and clear style and a larger increase between the clear and loud style. Alternatively, talkers in the Loud-Clear group exhibited no differences in speech intensity between the loud and clear styles, retaining the increases associated with the loud style during clear speech. Additionally, talkers in the Loud-Clear group exhibited a more graded change in lip aperture range and speech rate between the habitual, loud, and clear speech styles. In contrast, those in the Clear-Loud group retained the changes in lip aperture range and speech rate that were observed in the clear style when performing the loud style.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite some between-participant variation in the observed trends, these data suggest that most talkers retained characteristics of the previously performed higher effort style in subsequent style.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00350\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consistency of Order Effects in Higher Effort Speaking Styles Between Sessions.
Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the extent to which instruction order impacts the clear and loud speech response and to examine the consistency of the clear and loud speech response across two sessions.
Method: Acoustic and kinematic data from sentences produced in habitual, loud, and clear speech styles were collected from participants assigned in two groups: a Clear-Loud group (order: habitual, clear, loud) and a Loud-Clear group (order: habitual, loud, clear styles). Participants performed the same protocol order during two sessions scheduled 1 week apart.
Results: Analyses revealed that there were no significant differences between groups for speech intensity, lip aperture range, and speech rate in the habitual style. In both sessions, talkers in the Clear-Loud group exhibited a modest increase in speech intensity between the habitual and clear style and a larger increase between the clear and loud style. Alternatively, talkers in the Loud-Clear group exhibited no differences in speech intensity between the loud and clear styles, retaining the increases associated with the loud style during clear speech. Additionally, talkers in the Loud-Clear group exhibited a more graded change in lip aperture range and speech rate between the habitual, loud, and clear speech styles. In contrast, those in the Clear-Loud group retained the changes in lip aperture range and speech rate that were observed in the clear style when performing the loud style.
Conclusion: Despite some between-participant variation in the observed trends, these data suggest that most talkers retained characteristics of the previously performed higher effort style in subsequent style.
期刊介绍:
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.