耳鼻喉科的贬值:CMS参与医师报销的评价。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1002/lary.32170
R Peter Manes, Sagar Vasandani
{"title":"耳鼻喉科的贬值:CMS参与医师报销的评价。","authors":"R Peter Manes, Sagar Vasandani","doi":"10.1002/lary.32170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the rate at which the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) recommended relative value unit (RVU) values for otolaryngology procedures are accepted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Federal Register (https://www.federalregister.gov) was queried from 1995 to 2021 to identify the annual Medicare Final Rule. Within the Medicare Final Rule, all codes reviewed by the RUC were evaluated by two independent authors. Codes where the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) and/or the Triologic Society participated in the valuation were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1995 to 2021, 271 codes relating to otolaryngology were surveyed and valued by the RUC. In 201 (74%) of those codes, CMS did not alter the RUC recommended value. CMS did alter the RUC recommended value of 70 (26%) codes. From 1995 to 2008, 91 otolaryngology codes were valued. Eighty (88%) of those values were not altered by CMS. Eleven (12%) values were altered by CMS in the Medicare Final Rule. From 2009 to 2021, 180 otolaryngology codes were valued. One hundred twenty-one (67%) of those values were not altered by CMS. Fifty-nine (33%) of those values were altered by CMS. The difference between the two time periods was significant (p = 0.0002). The reduction by CMS throughout all codes ranged from 2% to 100%, with an average alteration of 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMS is taking an increasing role in altering RUC-approved values for otolaryngology procedures. This has implications for both otolaryngology and all medical societies in terms of how their procedures are valued.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS' Involvement in Physician Reimbursement.\",\"authors\":\"R Peter Manes, Sagar Vasandani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the rate at which the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) recommended relative value unit (RVU) values for otolaryngology procedures are accepted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Federal Register (https://www.federalregister.gov) was queried from 1995 to 2021 to identify the annual Medicare Final Rule. Within the Medicare Final Rule, all codes reviewed by the RUC were evaluated by two independent authors. Codes where the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) and/or the Triologic Society participated in the valuation were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1995 to 2021, 271 codes relating to otolaryngology were surveyed and valued by the RUC. In 201 (74%) of those codes, CMS did not alter the RUC recommended value. CMS did alter the RUC recommended value of 70 (26%) codes. From 1995 to 2008, 91 otolaryngology codes were valued. Eighty (88%) of those values were not altered by CMS. Eleven (12%) values were altered by CMS in the Medicare Final Rule. From 2009 to 2021, 180 otolaryngology codes were valued. One hundred twenty-one (67%) of those values were not altered by CMS. Fifty-nine (33%) of those values were altered by CMS. The difference between the two time periods was significant (p = 0.0002). The reduction by CMS throughout all codes ranged from 2% to 100%, with an average alteration of 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMS is taking an increasing role in altering RUC-approved values for otolaryngology procedures. This has implications for both otolaryngology and all medical societies in terms of how their procedures are valued.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>N/A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估相对价值量表更新委员会(RUC)推荐的耳鼻喉科手术相对价值单位(RVU)值被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)接受的比率。方法:查询1995年至2021年的联邦公报(https://www.federalregister.gov),以确定年度医疗保险最终规则。在医疗保险最终规则中,RUC审查的所有代码都由两位独立作者进行评估。提取了美国耳鼻喉头颈外科学会(AAOHNS)和/或三联学学会参与评估的代码。结果:1995年至2021年,中国人民大学共对271例耳鼻喉科相关规范进行了调查和评估。在201例(74%)的代码中,CMS没有改变RUC推荐值。CMS确实改变了70个(26%)代码的RUC推荐值。1995 - 2008年共对91个耳鼻喉科编码进行了鉴定。其中80%(88%)未被CMS改变。在医疗保险最终规则中,有11个(12%)值被CMS改变。2009年至2021年,对180个耳鼻喉科代码进行了评估。其中121例(67%)未被CMS改变。其中59个(33%)被CMS改变。两个时间段之间的差异是显著的(p = 0.0002)。CMS在所有代码中的减少幅度从2%到100%不等,平均变化为5%。结论:CMS在改变耳鼻喉科ruc批准值方面发挥着越来越大的作用。这对耳鼻喉科和所有医学协会都有影响,因为他们的手术是如何评估的。证据级别:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS' Involvement in Physician Reimbursement.

Objective: To evaluate the rate at which the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) recommended relative value unit (RVU) values for otolaryngology procedures are accepted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Methods: The Federal Register (https://www.federalregister.gov) was queried from 1995 to 2021 to identify the annual Medicare Final Rule. Within the Medicare Final Rule, all codes reviewed by the RUC were evaluated by two independent authors. Codes where the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) and/or the Triologic Society participated in the valuation were extracted.

Results: From 1995 to 2021, 271 codes relating to otolaryngology were surveyed and valued by the RUC. In 201 (74%) of those codes, CMS did not alter the RUC recommended value. CMS did alter the RUC recommended value of 70 (26%) codes. From 1995 to 2008, 91 otolaryngology codes were valued. Eighty (88%) of those values were not altered by CMS. Eleven (12%) values were altered by CMS in the Medicare Final Rule. From 2009 to 2021, 180 otolaryngology codes were valued. One hundred twenty-one (67%) of those values were not altered by CMS. Fifty-nine (33%) of those values were altered by CMS. The difference between the two time periods was significant (p = 0.0002). The reduction by CMS throughout all codes ranged from 2% to 100%, with an average alteration of 5%.

Conclusion: CMS is taking an increasing role in altering RUC-approved values for otolaryngology procedures. This has implications for both otolaryngology and all medical societies in terms of how their procedures are valued.

Level of evidence: N/A.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信