社区联系项目后生活质量和孤独感的改善:南澳大利亚社区的试点干预。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bryony Jardine, Pei Jie Tan, Ashleigh Powell, Diana Eyers-White, Catherine Mackenzie, Ian Goodwin-Smith, Sandra Robinson, Penny Baldock, Mia Zaccardo, Celina Valente, Camilla Trenerry, Svetlana Bogomolova
{"title":"社区联系项目后生活质量和孤独感的改善:南澳大利亚社区的试点干预。","authors":"Bryony Jardine, Pei Jie Tan, Ashleigh Powell, Diana Eyers-White, Catherine Mackenzie, Ian Goodwin-Smith, Sandra Robinson, Penny Baldock, Mia Zaccardo, Celina Valente, Camilla Trenerry, Svetlana Bogomolova","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02674-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing loneliness and enhancing quality of life (QoL) are key public health priorities. However, limited empirical research examines the impact of community-based interventions on both loneliness and QoL. This study employed a single-group pre-post design to evaluate the South Australian pilot intervention, the Community Connections Program (CCP), assessing its effects on participants' self-reported QoL and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals referred to the CCP pilot completed an interviewer-led survey at both intervention intake and completion. QoL was assessed with the Assessment of Quality of Life - 6 dimensions tool (AQoL-6D). Loneliness was assessed with the Campaign to End Loneliness Tool - 3-item measure (CtELT). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 195 adults who completed both data collection points were evaluated. AQoL-6D improved from intervention intake (M = 57; SD = 16) to completion (M = 66; SD = 13) (t(194) = -9.73, p <.05; d = 0.62). All six dimensions of AQoL improved, with the greatest increase in scores occurring for mental health, relationships and coping (results were statistically significant at p <.05). The largest within-group effect size was found for the dimension of mental health (d = 0.8). Participants' overall feelings of loneliness significantly decreased between pre- (M = 6.7; SD = 2.99) and post- (M = 4.4; SD = 2.00) intervention measurement (t(186) = 10.50, p <.05; d = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants of the CCP pilot intervention reported significantly improved QoL and reduced loneliness at program completion. The CCP shows promise for the ability of community-based interventions to reduce loneliness and improve QoL for individuals disconnected from their communities and local health and support care services. These findings have implications for the development of programs that facilitate place-based, person-centered connections as important drivers of public health and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement in quality of life and loneliness after the community connections program: a community-based pilot intervention in South Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Bryony Jardine, Pei Jie Tan, Ashleigh Powell, Diana Eyers-White, Catherine Mackenzie, Ian Goodwin-Smith, Sandra Robinson, Penny Baldock, Mia Zaccardo, Celina Valente, Camilla Trenerry, Svetlana Bogomolova\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-025-02674-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing loneliness and enhancing quality of life (QoL) are key public health priorities. However, limited empirical research examines the impact of community-based interventions on both loneliness and QoL. This study employed a single-group pre-post design to evaluate the South Australian pilot intervention, the Community Connections Program (CCP), assessing its effects on participants' self-reported QoL and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals referred to the CCP pilot completed an interviewer-led survey at both intervention intake and completion. QoL was assessed with the Assessment of Quality of Life - 6 dimensions tool (AQoL-6D). Loneliness was assessed with the Campaign to End Loneliness Tool - 3-item measure (CtELT). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 195 adults who completed both data collection points were evaluated. AQoL-6D improved from intervention intake (M = 57; SD = 16) to completion (M = 66; SD = 13) (t(194) = -9.73, p <.05; d = 0.62). All six dimensions of AQoL improved, with the greatest increase in scores occurring for mental health, relationships and coping (results were statistically significant at p <.05). The largest within-group effect size was found for the dimension of mental health (d = 0.8). Participants' overall feelings of loneliness significantly decreased between pre- (M = 6.7; SD = 2.99) and post- (M = 4.4; SD = 2.00) intervention measurement (t(186) = 10.50, p <.05; d = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants of the CCP pilot intervention reported significantly improved QoL and reduced loneliness at program completion. The CCP shows promise for the ability of community-based interventions to reduce loneliness and improve QoL for individuals disconnected from their communities and local health and support care services. These findings have implications for the development of programs that facilitate place-based, person-centered connections as important drivers of public health and wellbeing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02674-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02674-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减少孤独感和提高生活质量(QoL)是关键的公共卫生重点。然而,有限的实证研究考察了社区干预对孤独和生活质量的影响。本研究采用单组岗前设计来评估南澳大利亚试点干预,社区联系计划(CCP),评估其对参与者自我报告的生活质量和孤独感的影响。方法:参与CCP试点的个体在干预开始和结束时完成了一项由访谈者主导的调查。使用生活质量评估-6维度工具(aql - 6d)评估生活质量。孤独感通过结束孤独运动工具- 3项测量(CtELT)进行评估。数据分析采用描述性统计和配对样本t检验。结果:195名完成两个数据收集点的成年人的数据被评估。干预后AQoL-6D改善(M = 57;SD = 16)至完成(M = 66;结论:CCP试点干预的参与者报告在项目完成时生活质量显著改善,孤独感减少。CCP显示出以社区为基础的干预措施能够减少孤独感并改善与社区和当地卫生和支助护理服务脱节的个人的生活质量。这些发现对促进以地点为基础的、以人为中心的联系作为公共健康和福祉的重要驱动力的项目的发展具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvement in quality of life and loneliness after the community connections program: a community-based pilot intervention in South Australia.

Background: Reducing loneliness and enhancing quality of life (QoL) are key public health priorities. However, limited empirical research examines the impact of community-based interventions on both loneliness and QoL. This study employed a single-group pre-post design to evaluate the South Australian pilot intervention, the Community Connections Program (CCP), assessing its effects on participants' self-reported QoL and loneliness.

Methods: Individuals referred to the CCP pilot completed an interviewer-led survey at both intervention intake and completion. QoL was assessed with the Assessment of Quality of Life - 6 dimensions tool (AQoL-6D). Loneliness was assessed with the Campaign to End Loneliness Tool - 3-item measure (CtELT). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests.

Results: Data from 195 adults who completed both data collection points were evaluated. AQoL-6D improved from intervention intake (M = 57; SD = 16) to completion (M = 66; SD = 13) (t(194) = -9.73, p <.05; d = 0.62). All six dimensions of AQoL improved, with the greatest increase in scores occurring for mental health, relationships and coping (results were statistically significant at p <.05). The largest within-group effect size was found for the dimension of mental health (d = 0.8). Participants' overall feelings of loneliness significantly decreased between pre- (M = 6.7; SD = 2.99) and post- (M = 4.4; SD = 2.00) intervention measurement (t(186) = 10.50, p <.05; d = 0.90).

Conclusions: Participants of the CCP pilot intervention reported significantly improved QoL and reduced loneliness at program completion. The CCP shows promise for the ability of community-based interventions to reduce loneliness and improve QoL for individuals disconnected from their communities and local health and support care services. These findings have implications for the development of programs that facilitate place-based, person-centered connections as important drivers of public health and wellbeing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信