类固醇矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂副作用和停药原因:患者调查(RELICS-PS)。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S489802
Emma L Richard, Judith J Stephenson, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler
{"title":"类固醇矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂副作用和停药原因:患者调查(RELICS-PS)。","authors":"Emma L Richard, Judith J Stephenson, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler","doi":"10.2147/POR.S489802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) treatment patterns and side effects from patients' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RELICS-PS study, a complement to the claims-based RELICS study, used a cross-sectional patient survey targeting adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance who had at least one pharmacy claim for sMRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone) between July 2021 and June 2022. It used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>) as the sampling frame to identify eligible patients. A total of 600 completed surveys were targeted from current and past sMRA users between November and December 2022. The survey collected data on demographics, chronic conditions, prespecified side effects, and reasons for discontinuation among past sMRA users, describing the data without inferential testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 600 respondents, 49.2% reported at least one side effect. Side effects varied from 5.5% (weak pulse and chest pains) to 40.0% (sluggishness or fatigue). Reports of symptoms of male gynecomastia were noticeably higher than in medical claims in RELICS (17.4% vs 2.9%). Past users, consisting of 24.3% of respondents, were more likely to report experiencing side effects, experiencing them more frequently, and being more affected by them. Approximately a third of these respondents reported side effects as a deciding factor for discontinuation. Healthcare providers' recommendations, often informed by medication effectiveness and patient tolerance, were the most cited reason for discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although half of the respondents reported experiencing side effects, 39.0% of past users identified side effects as a reason for discontinuation. This suggests a gap between patient experience and perceived reasons for discontinuation. A notable finding from the study is the significant role of healthcare providers in influencing the decisions to start or stop sMRA treatment. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring the factors that shape healthcare providers' decision-making processes when initiating and discontinuing treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Side Effects and Reasons for Discontinuation: A Patient Survey (RELICS-PS).\",\"authors\":\"Emma L Richard, Judith J Stephenson, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S489802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) treatment patterns and side effects from patients' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RELICS-PS study, a complement to the claims-based RELICS study, used a cross-sectional patient survey targeting adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance who had at least one pharmacy claim for sMRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone) between July 2021 and June 2022. It used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>) as the sampling frame to identify eligible patients. A total of 600 completed surveys were targeted from current and past sMRA users between November and December 2022. The survey collected data on demographics, chronic conditions, prespecified side effects, and reasons for discontinuation among past sMRA users, describing the data without inferential testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 600 respondents, 49.2% reported at least one side effect. Side effects varied from 5.5% (weak pulse and chest pains) to 40.0% (sluggishness or fatigue). Reports of symptoms of male gynecomastia were noticeably higher than in medical claims in RELICS (17.4% vs 2.9%). Past users, consisting of 24.3% of respondents, were more likely to report experiencing side effects, experiencing them more frequently, and being more affected by them. Approximately a third of these respondents reported side effects as a deciding factor for discontinuation. Healthcare providers' recommendations, often informed by medication effectiveness and patient tolerance, were the most cited reason for discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although half of the respondents reported experiencing side effects, 39.0% of past users identified side effects as a reason for discontinuation. This suggests a gap between patient experience and perceived reasons for discontinuation. A notable finding from the study is the significant role of healthcare providers in influencing the decisions to start or stop sMRA treatment. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring the factors that shape healthcare providers' decision-making processes when initiating and discontinuing treatment options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"121-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S489802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S489802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从患者的角度了解甾体矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(sMRAs)的治疗模式和副作用。方法:RELICS- ps研究是基于索赔的relic研究的补充,采用了一项横断患者调查,目标是在2021年7月至2022年6月期间至少有一项smra(螺内酯或依普瑞酮)药房索赔的商业或Medicare Advantage健康保险成年人。它使用医疗保健综合研究数据库(HIRD®)作为抽样框架来确定符合条件的患者。在2022年11月至12月期间,共有600份已完成的调查针对当前和过去的sMRA用户。该调查收集了过去sMRA使用者的人口统计数据、慢性疾病、预先规定的副作用和停药原因,描述了没有推论检验的数据。结果:在600名受访者中,49.2%的人报告了至少一种副作用。副作用从5.5%(脉搏微弱和胸痛)到40.0%(行动迟缓或疲劳)不等。在relic中,男性男性乳房发育症的症状报告明显高于医疗索赔(17.4% vs 2.9%)。过去的使用者,占受访者的24.3%,更有可能报告经历副作用,更频繁地经历副作用,并且受到副作用的影响更大。大约三分之一的受访者表示,副作用是决定是否停用的因素。医疗保健提供者的建议,通常是根据药物有效性和患者耐受性,是最常见的停药原因。结论:虽然一半的受访者报告有副作用,但39.0%的过去使用者认为副作用是停药的原因。这表明患者的经验和感知到的停药原因之间存在差距。该研究的一个显著发现是,医疗服务提供者在决定开始或停止sMRA治疗方面发挥了重要作用。因此,未来的研究应侧重于探索在开始和停止治疗方案时影响医疗保健提供者决策过程的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Side Effects and Reasons for Discontinuation: A Patient Survey (RELICS-PS).

Purpose: To understand steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) treatment patterns and side effects from patients' perspectives.

Methods: The RELICS-PS study, a complement to the claims-based RELICS study, used a cross-sectional patient survey targeting adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance who had at least one pharmacy claim for sMRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone) between July 2021 and June 2022. It used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) as the sampling frame to identify eligible patients. A total of 600 completed surveys were targeted from current and past sMRA users between November and December 2022. The survey collected data on demographics, chronic conditions, prespecified side effects, and reasons for discontinuation among past sMRA users, describing the data without inferential testing.

Results: Of 600 respondents, 49.2% reported at least one side effect. Side effects varied from 5.5% (weak pulse and chest pains) to 40.0% (sluggishness or fatigue). Reports of symptoms of male gynecomastia were noticeably higher than in medical claims in RELICS (17.4% vs 2.9%). Past users, consisting of 24.3% of respondents, were more likely to report experiencing side effects, experiencing them more frequently, and being more affected by them. Approximately a third of these respondents reported side effects as a deciding factor for discontinuation. Healthcare providers' recommendations, often informed by medication effectiveness and patient tolerance, were the most cited reason for discontinuation.

Conclusion: Although half of the respondents reported experiencing side effects, 39.0% of past users identified side effects as a reason for discontinuation. This suggests a gap between patient experience and perceived reasons for discontinuation. A notable finding from the study is the significant role of healthcare providers in influencing the decisions to start or stop sMRA treatment. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring the factors that shape healthcare providers' decision-making processes when initiating and discontinuing treatment options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信