{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂与单独酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hengyu Tian, Chidan Wan","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03788-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and advanced-stage disease presents significant therapeutic challenges. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TACE + TKIs + ICIs compared to TKIs + ICIs alone in patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across \"PubMed\", \"Web of Science\", \"Cochrane Library\", \"Scopus\", \"Google Scholar\", and \"Embase\" to screen studies up to November 2024. Studies comparing TACE + TKIs + ICIs with TKIs + ICIs alone in advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. Results were reported as relative risk (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies comprising 1999 patients were included. The combination of TACE + TKIs + ICIs marked improved ORR (RR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.57-2.09, P < 0.00001) and DCR (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.19-1.46, P < 0.00001) comparing with TKIs + ICIs alone. OS and PFS were also significantly prolonged in combination group, with HR of 0.55 (95%CI:0.48-0.63, P < 0.00001) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.65-0.82, P < 0.00001), respectively. Adverse events such as pain (RR = 3.94, 95%CI:2.40-6.47, P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 2.28, 95% CI:1.56-3.33, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the TACE + TKIs + ICIs group, though rates of hypertension, diarrhea, and rash were similar between groups. Funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias for primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs significantly improves ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS compared to TKIs and ICIs alone, demonstrating superior efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. These findings provide evidence for the integration of TACE with systemic therapies in the management of HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hengyu Tian, Chidan Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12957-025-03788-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and advanced-stage disease presents significant therapeutic challenges. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TACE + TKIs + ICIs compared to TKIs + ICIs alone in patients with HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across \\\"PubMed\\\", \\\"Web of Science\\\", \\\"Cochrane Library\\\", \\\"Scopus\\\", \\\"Google Scholar\\\", and \\\"Embase\\\" to screen studies up to November 2024. Studies comparing TACE + TKIs + ICIs with TKIs + ICIs alone in advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. Results were reported as relative risk (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies comprising 1999 patients were included. The combination of TACE + TKIs + ICIs marked improved ORR (RR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.57-2.09, P < 0.00001) and DCR (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.19-1.46, P < 0.00001) comparing with TKIs + ICIs alone. OS and PFS were also significantly prolonged in combination group, with HR of 0.55 (95%CI:0.48-0.63, P < 0.00001) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.65-0.82, P < 0.00001), respectively. Adverse events such as pain (RR = 3.94, 95%CI:2.40-6.47, P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 2.28, 95% CI:1.56-3.33, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the TACE + TKIs + ICIs group, though rates of hypertension, diarrhea, and rash were similar between groups. Funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias for primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs significantly improves ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS compared to TKIs and ICIs alone, demonstrating superior efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. These findings provide evidence for the integration of TACE with systemic therapies in the management of HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03788-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03788-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因,晚期疾病提出了重大的治疗挑战。经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已成为一种有希望提高治疗效果的策略。本荟萃分析评估了TACE + TKIs + ICIs与单独TKIs + ICIs在HCC患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:系统检索“PubMed”、“Web of Science”、“Cochrane Library”、“Scopus”、“谷歌Scholar”和“Embase”,筛选截至2024年11月的研究。比较TACE + TKIs + ICIs与单独TKIs + ICIs在晚期HCC中的研究纳入。研究结果包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件。结果以95%置信区间(CI)的相对危险度(RR)或危险比(HR)报告。采用漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:纳入10项研究,包括1999例患者。TACE + TKIs + ICIs联合治疗与单独TKIs + ICIs相比,ORR (RR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.57 ~ 2.09, P < 0.00001)和DCR (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.19 ~ 1.46, P < 0.00001)显著改善。联合组OS和PFS均显著延长,相对危险度分别为0.55 (95%CI:0.48 ~ 0.63, P < 0.00001)和0.73 (95%CI:0.65 ~ 0.82, P < 0.00001)。不良事件如疼痛(RR = 3.94, 95%CI:2.40-6.47, P < 0.001)和恶心/呕吐(RR = 2.28, 95%CI: 1.56-3.33, P < 0.001)在TACE + TKIs + ICIs组更常见,尽管高血压、腹泻和皮疹的发生率在两组之间相似。漏斗图显示主要结果的发表偏倚最小。结论:与单独使用TKIs和ICIs相比,TACE、TKIs和ICIs联合使用可显著改善ORR、DCR、OS和PFS,显示出卓越的疗效和可接受的安全性。这些发现为肝癌治疗中TACE联合全身治疗提供了证据。
Comparative efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors alone in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and advanced-stage disease presents significant therapeutic challenges. Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance treatment efficacy. This meta-analysis evaluates efficacy and safety of TACE + TKIs + ICIs compared to TKIs + ICIs alone in patients with HCC.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across "PubMed", "Web of Science", "Cochrane Library", "Scopus", "Google Scholar", and "Embase" to screen studies up to November 2024. Studies comparing TACE + TKIs + ICIs with TKIs + ICIs alone in advanced HCC were included. Outcomes of interest included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events. Results were reported as relative risk (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Funnel plots was used to assess publication bias.
Results: Ten studies comprising 1999 patients were included. The combination of TACE + TKIs + ICIs marked improved ORR (RR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.57-2.09, P < 0.00001) and DCR (RR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.19-1.46, P < 0.00001) comparing with TKIs + ICIs alone. OS and PFS were also significantly prolonged in combination group, with HR of 0.55 (95%CI:0.48-0.63, P < 0.00001) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.65-0.82, P < 0.00001), respectively. Adverse events such as pain (RR = 3.94, 95%CI:2.40-6.47, P < 0.001) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 2.28, 95% CI:1.56-3.33, P < 0.001) were more frequent in the TACE + TKIs + ICIs group, though rates of hypertension, diarrhea, and rash were similar between groups. Funnel plots indicated minimal publication bias for primary outcomes.
Conclusions: The combination of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs significantly improves ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS compared to TKIs and ICIs alone, demonstrating superior efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. These findings provide evidence for the integration of TACE with systemic therapies in the management of HCC.
期刊介绍:
World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics.
Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.