俄乌冲突和新冠疫情不同冲击下能源市场和金融市场网络结构的变化。

IF 2.6 3区综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0318291

Fuyao Li, Mu Tong, Shuhao Guan

{"title":"俄乌冲突和新冠疫情不同冲击下能源市场和金融市场网络结构的变化。","authors":"Fuyao Li, Mu Tong, Shuhao Guan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0318291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employing the quantile coherency method, we analyze the different impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the global shock caused by COVID-19 on energy and stock markets, highlighting how market behaviors varied under these two crises. The findings reveal that natural gas performed better than oil during the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict in the short and medium term. In contrast, oil outperforms natural gas over the long term.","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 4","pages":"e0318291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in the network structure of energy markets and financial markets under the different shocks of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Fuyao Li, Mu Tong, Shuhao Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0318291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Employing the quantile coherency method, we analyze the different impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the global shock caused by COVID-19 on energy and stock markets, highlighting how market behaviors varied under these two crises. The findings reveal that natural gas performed better than oil during the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict in the short and medium term. In contrast, oil outperforms natural gas over the long term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"e0318291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318291\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318291","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用分位数相干性方法，分析了俄乌冲突和新冠肺炎引发的全球冲击对能源市场和股票市场的不同影响，突出了这两种危机下市场行为的差异。研究结果显示，在疫情和俄乌冲突期间，天然气的中短期表现优于石油。相比之下，从长期来看，石油的表现优于天然气。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Changes in the network structure of energy markets and financial markets under the different shocks of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and COVID-19.

Employing the quantile coherency method, we analyze the different impacts of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the global shock caused by COVID-19 on energy and stock markets, highlighting how market behaviors varied under these two crises. The findings reveal that natural gas performed better than oil during the pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine conflict in the short and medium term. In contrast, oil outperforms natural gas over the long term.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PLoS ONE 生物-生物学

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

5.40%

发文量

14242

审稿时长

3.7 months

期刊介绍： PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage