以检查点抑制治疗为例的癌症患者日常临床护理的生活质量(QoL)——德尔菲共识。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Philipp Ivanyi, Bernd Alt-Epping, Lars Bullinger, Anja Gesierich, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Urs Münch, Susanne Pfitzner-Dempfle, Christina Rieger, Achim Rittmeyer, Urban Wiesing, Martin Wolf, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
{"title":"以检查点抑制治疗为例的癌症患者日常临床护理的生活质量(QoL)——德尔菲共识。","authors":"Philipp Ivanyi, Bernd Alt-Epping, Lars Bullinger, Anja Gesierich, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Urs Münch, Susanne Pfitzner-Dempfle, Christina Rieger, Achim Rittmeyer, Urban Wiesing, Martin Wolf, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz","doi":"10.1159/000545513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in oncology has improved the long-term perspectives of many patients and is bringing the quality of life (QoL) into focus as a treatment-relevant variable. In clinical routine, standardized and reliable tools for collecting, understanding, and utilizing QoL information are needed. In the current work, an interdisciplinary consensus on aspects of QoL in standard clinical practice has been put forth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After independent, structured individual interviews with members of an interdisciplinary expert panel (n = 12), ten theses on QoL with particular consideration regarding CPI therapy were drafted. These formed the basis of a multistage, independent, anonymous, externally commented, qualitative Delphi process. During the period May - December 2022, the panel developed interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for recording QoL and its role in decision-making in everyday care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of ten theses, five recommendations arranged into three subject areas were agreed upon. QoL is considered a multifactorial and dynamic parameter that goes far beyond treatment-associated side effects. Mindful communication with the patient is considered the basis for QoL assessment and QoL modification. In everyday clinical practice, QoL should be documented and assessed in a structured, regular, and individualized way, thereby providing a basis for decisions on treatment options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The individual QoL of cancer patients should be assessed before and throughout therapy. Especially for long-term responders of CPI therapy and in the adjuvant setting, QoL appears to be treatment relevant. The recommendations based on the Delphi method provide practical assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Routine Clinical Care Using the Example of Checkpoint Inhibition Therapy: A Delphi Consensus.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Ivanyi, Bernd Alt-Epping, Lars Bullinger, Anja Gesierich, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Urs Münch, Susanne Pfitzner-Dempfle, Christina Rieger, Achim Rittmeyer, Urban Wiesing, Martin Wolf, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in oncology has improved the long-term perspectives of many patients and is bringing the quality of life (QoL) into focus as a treatment-relevant variable. In clinical routine, standardized and reliable tools for collecting, understanding, and utilizing QoL information are needed. In the current work, an interdisciplinary consensus on aspects of QoL in standard clinical practice has been put forth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After independent, structured individual interviews with members of an interdisciplinary expert panel (n = 12), ten theses on QoL with particular consideration regarding CPI therapy were drafted. These formed the basis of a multistage, independent, anonymous, externally commented, qualitative Delphi process. During the period May - December 2022, the panel developed interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for recording QoL and its role in decision-making in everyday care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of ten theses, five recommendations arranged into three subject areas were agreed upon. QoL is considered a multifactorial and dynamic parameter that goes far beyond treatment-associated side effects. Mindful communication with the patient is considered the basis for QoL assessment and QoL modification. In everyday clinical practice, QoL should be documented and assessed in a structured, regular, and individualized way, thereby providing a basis for decisions on treatment options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The individual QoL of cancer patients should be assessed before and throughout therapy. Especially for long-term responders of CPI therapy and in the adjuvant setting, QoL appears to be treatment relevant. The recommendations based on the Delphi method provide practical assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101803/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545513\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肿瘤学中引入免疫检查点抑制剂(CPIs)已经改善了许多患者的长期前景,并将生活质量(QoL)作为治疗相关变量纳入焦点。在临床常规中,需要标准化和可靠的工具来收集、理解和利用生活质量信息。在目前的工作中,已经提出了标准临床实践中生活质量方面的跨学科共识。方法:在与跨学科专家小组成员(n=12)进行独立、结构化的个人访谈后,撰写了10篇关于生活质量的论文,特别考虑了CPI治疗。这些构成了多阶段、独立、匿名、外部评论、定性德尔菲过程的基础。在05-12/2022期间,专家组就记录生活质量及其在日常护理决策中的作用制定了跨学科共识建议。结果:在10篇论文中,有5篇建议被分成了3个主题领域。生活质量被认为是一个多因素和动态参数,远远超出了治疗相关的副作用。与患者有意识的沟通被认为是生活质量评估和生活质量修改的基础。在日常临床实践中,生活质量应以结构化、规范化和个性化的方式进行记录和评估,从而为治疗方案的决策提供依据。结论:应在治疗前及治疗过程中评估肿瘤患者的个体生活质量。特别是对于CPI治疗的长期应答者和辅助设置,生活质量似乎与治疗相关。基于德尔菲法的建议提供了实际的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Routine Clinical Care Using the Example of Checkpoint Inhibition Therapy: A Delphi Consensus.

Introduction: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in oncology has improved the long-term perspectives of many patients and is bringing the quality of life (QoL) into focus as a treatment-relevant variable. In clinical routine, standardized and reliable tools for collecting, understanding, and utilizing QoL information are needed. In the current work, an interdisciplinary consensus on aspects of QoL in standard clinical practice has been put forth.

Methods: After independent, structured individual interviews with members of an interdisciplinary expert panel (n = 12), ten theses on QoL with particular consideration regarding CPI therapy were drafted. These formed the basis of a multistage, independent, anonymous, externally commented, qualitative Delphi process. During the period May - December 2022, the panel developed interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for recording QoL and its role in decision-making in everyday care.

Results: Out of ten theses, five recommendations arranged into three subject areas were agreed upon. QoL is considered a multifactorial and dynamic parameter that goes far beyond treatment-associated side effects. Mindful communication with the patient is considered the basis for QoL assessment and QoL modification. In everyday clinical practice, QoL should be documented and assessed in a structured, regular, and individualized way, thereby providing a basis for decisions on treatment options.

Conclusion: The individual QoL of cancer patients should be assessed before and throughout therapy. Especially for long-term responders of CPI therapy and in the adjuvant setting, QoL appears to be treatment relevant. The recommendations based on the Delphi method provide practical assistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信