David L Gillett, Malyn Selinidis, Travis Seamons, Dalton George, Alexandria N Igwe, Ilenne Del Valle, Robert G Egbert, Kirsten S Hofmockel, Alicia L Johnson, Kirstin R W Matthews, Caroline A Masiello, Lauren B Stadler, James Chappell, Jonathan J Silberg
{"title":"A roadmap to understanding and anticipating microbial gene transfer in soil communities.","authors":"David L Gillett, Malyn Selinidis, Travis Seamons, Dalton George, Alexandria N Igwe, Ilenne Del Valle, Robert G Egbert, Kirsten S Hofmockel, Alicia L Johnson, Kirstin R W Matthews, Caroline A Masiello, Lauren B Stadler, James Chappell, Jonathan J Silberg","doi":"10.1128/mmbr.00225-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYEngineered microbes are being programmed using synthetic DNA for applications in soil to overcome global challenges related to climate change, energy, food security, and pollution. However, we cannot yet predict gene transfer processes in soil to assess the frequency of unintentional transfer of engineered DNA to environmental microbes when applying synthetic biology technologies at scale. This challenge exists because of the complex and heterogeneous characteristics of soils, which contribute to the fitness and transport of cells and the exchange of genetic material within communities. Here, we describe knowledge gaps about gene transfer across soil microbiomes. We propose strategies to improve our understanding of gene transfer across soil communities, highlight the need to benchmark the performance of biocontainment measures <i>in situ</i>, and discuss responsibly engaging community stakeholders. We highlight opportunities to address knowledge gaps, such as creating a set of soil standards for studying gene transfer across diverse soil types and measuring gene transfer host range across microbiomes using emerging technologies. By comparing gene transfer rates, host range, and persistence of engineered microbes across different soils, we posit that community-scale, environment-specific models can be built that anticipate biotechnology risks. Such studies will enable the design of safer biotechnologies that allow us to realize the benefits of synthetic biology and mitigate risks associated with the release of such technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18520,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0022524"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00225-24","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要人们正在利用合成 DNA 对工程微生物进行编程,并将其应用于土壤中,以克服与气候变化、能源、食品安全和污染有关的全球性挑战。然而,我们还无法预测土壤中的基因转移过程,无法评估在大规模应用合成生物学技术时,工程 DNA 意外转移到环境微生物中的频率。之所以存在这一挑战,是因为土壤具有复杂的异质性特征,这有助于细胞的适应性和迁移以及群落内遗传物质的交换。在此,我们将介绍有关土壤微生物群落间基因转移的知识缺口。我们提出了改善对土壤群落间基因转移的理解的策略,强调了对原位生物隔离措施性能进行基准测试的必要性,并讨论了以负责任的方式让群落利益相关者参与进来的问题。我们强调了解决知识差距的机会,例如创建一套土壤标准,用于研究不同土壤类型的基因转移,以及利用新兴技术测量不同微生物群的基因转移宿主范围。通过比较基因转移率、宿主范围和工程微生物在不同土壤中的持久性,我们认为可以建立社区规模的特定环境模型,预测生物技术风险。这些研究将有助于设计更安全的生物技术,使我们能够实现合成生物学的益处,并降低与此类技术发布相关的风险。
A roadmap to understanding and anticipating microbial gene transfer in soil communities.
SUMMARYEngineered microbes are being programmed using synthetic DNA for applications in soil to overcome global challenges related to climate change, energy, food security, and pollution. However, we cannot yet predict gene transfer processes in soil to assess the frequency of unintentional transfer of engineered DNA to environmental microbes when applying synthetic biology technologies at scale. This challenge exists because of the complex and heterogeneous characteristics of soils, which contribute to the fitness and transport of cells and the exchange of genetic material within communities. Here, we describe knowledge gaps about gene transfer across soil microbiomes. We propose strategies to improve our understanding of gene transfer across soil communities, highlight the need to benchmark the performance of biocontainment measures in situ, and discuss responsibly engaging community stakeholders. We highlight opportunities to address knowledge gaps, such as creating a set of soil standards for studying gene transfer across diverse soil types and measuring gene transfer host range across microbiomes using emerging technologies. By comparing gene transfer rates, host range, and persistence of engineered microbes across different soils, we posit that community-scale, environment-specific models can be built that anticipate biotechnology risks. Such studies will enable the design of safer biotechnologies that allow us to realize the benefits of synthetic biology and mitigate risks associated with the release of such technologies.
期刊介绍:
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (MMBR), a journal that explores the significance and interrelationships of recent discoveries in various microbiology fields, publishes review articles that help both specialists and nonspecialists understand and apply the latest findings in their own research. MMBR covers a wide range of topics in microbiology, including microbial ecology, evolution, parasitology, biotechnology, and immunology. The journal caters to scientists with diverse interests in all areas of microbial science and encompasses viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, unicellular eukaryotes, and microbial parasites. MMBR primarily publishes authoritative and critical reviews that push the boundaries of knowledge, appealing to both specialists and generalists. The journal often includes descriptive figures and tables to enhance understanding. Indexed/Abstracted in various databases such as Agricola, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service, Current Contents- Life Sciences, EMBASE, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Illustrata, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Summon, and Scopus, among others.