利用来自消费者可穿戴设备的加速度测量和心率数据来预测儿童的身体活动:一种与设备无关的方法。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Rahul Ghosal, James W White, Olivia Finnegan, Srihari Nelakuditi, Trey Brown, Russ Pate, Greg Welk, Massimiliano DE Zambotti, Yuan Wang, Sarah Burkart, Elizabeth L Adams, Bridget Armstrong, Michael W Beets, R Glenn Weaver
{"title":"利用来自消费者可穿戴设备的加速度测量和心率数据来预测儿童的身体活动:一种与设备无关的方法。","authors":"Rahul Ghosal, James W White, Olivia Finnegan, Srihari Nelakuditi, Trey Brown, Russ Pate, Greg Welk, Massimiliano DE Zambotti, Yuan Wang, Sarah Burkart, Elizabeth L Adams, Bridget Armstrong, Michael W Beets, R Glenn Weaver","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined the potential of a device agnostic approach for predicting physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) from research-grade and consumer wearable accelerometry and heart rate (HR) raw data compared with indirect calorimetry in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred thirty-one 5- to 12-yr-olds (52.4% male) of diverse skin tone and body weights participated in a 60-min protocol with multiple activities at varying intensities. Children wore two of three consumer wearables (Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4S, Fitbit Sense) and a research-grade accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X) on their nondominant wrist, and a chest-placed, research-grade HR monitor (Actiheart 5, ECG), concurrently. Children also wore a K5 criterion measure of PAEE (i.e., COSMED K5). Cross-sectional time series (CSTS), generalized additive mixed effects model (GAMM), and random forest (RF) were used to estimate minute-by-minute PAEE from features extracted from raw accelerometry and HR data. Variance explained ( R2 ), in addition to other metrics, evaluated agreement between estimated and criterion measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the research-grade devices (i.e., ActiGraph accelerometry and Actiheart HR), R2 values were 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 for CSTS, GAMM, and RF, respectively. For Apple, R2 values were 0.77, 0.76, and 0.78; Garmin's values were 0.73, 0.73, and 0.75; and Fitbit's values were 0.63, 0.65, and 0.67 for CSTS, GAMM, and RF, respectively. Across all other evaluation metrics, a similar pattern was observed with Fitbit performing the worst but with little variability between the modeling approaches or the other devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Except for Fitbit, accelerometry and HR data from consumer wearables predicted PAEE comparably to research-grade devices, and there was little variability across modeling approach. These outcomes support deploying a consumer wearable device-agnostic approach for PAEE estimation in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"2083-2092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Accelerometry and Heart Rate Data from Consumer Wearables to Predict Physical Activity in Children: A Device Agnostic Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Ghosal, James W White, Olivia Finnegan, Srihari Nelakuditi, Trey Brown, Russ Pate, Greg Welk, Massimiliano DE Zambotti, Yuan Wang, Sarah Burkart, Elizabeth L Adams, Bridget Armstrong, Michael W Beets, R Glenn Weaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examined the potential of a device agnostic approach for predicting physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) from research-grade and consumer wearable accelerometry and heart rate (HR) raw data compared with indirect calorimetry in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred thirty-one 5- to 12-yr-olds (52.4% male) of diverse skin tone and body weights participated in a 60-min protocol with multiple activities at varying intensities. Children wore two of three consumer wearables (Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4S, Fitbit Sense) and a research-grade accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X) on their nondominant wrist, and a chest-placed, research-grade HR monitor (Actiheart 5, ECG), concurrently. Children also wore a K5 criterion measure of PAEE (i.e., COSMED K5). Cross-sectional time series (CSTS), generalized additive mixed effects model (GAMM), and random forest (RF) were used to estimate minute-by-minute PAEE from features extracted from raw accelerometry and HR data. Variance explained ( R2 ), in addition to other metrics, evaluated agreement between estimated and criterion measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the research-grade devices (i.e., ActiGraph accelerometry and Actiheart HR), R2 values were 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 for CSTS, GAMM, and RF, respectively. For Apple, R2 values were 0.77, 0.76, and 0.78; Garmin's values were 0.73, 0.73, and 0.75; and Fitbit's values were 0.63, 0.65, and 0.67 for CSTS, GAMM, and RF, respectively. Across all other evaluation metrics, a similar pattern was observed with Fitbit performing the worst but with little variability between the modeling approaches or the other devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Except for Fitbit, accelerometry and HR data from consumer wearables predicted PAEE comparably to research-grade devices, and there was little variability across modeling approach. These outcomes support deploying a consumer wearable device-agnostic approach for PAEE estimation in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2083-2092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003721\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了与间接量热法相比,通过研究级和消费者可穿戴加速度计和心率(HR)原始数据预测儿童身体活动能量消耗(PAEE)的设备不可知方法的潜力。方法:不同肤色和体重的231名5-12岁儿童(52.4%为男性)参加了60分钟的不同强度的多项活动。孩子们同时佩戴三款消费级可穿戴设备中的两款(Apple Watch Series 7、Garmin Vivoactive 4S、Fitbit Sense)和一个研究级加速度计(ActiGraph GT9X),以及一个放在胸前的研究级HR监测器(Actiheart 5、ECG)。儿童还佩戴了PAEE的K5标准测量(即COSMED K5)。采用横截面时间序列(CSTS)、广义加性混合效应模型(GAMM)和随机森林(RF)从原始加速度测量和HR数据中提取的特征中估计每分钟的PAEE。方差解释(R2),除了其他指标,评估估计和标准测量之间的一致性。结果:对于研究级设备(即ActiGraph加速度计和Actiheart HR), CSTS、GAMM和RF的R2分别为0.74、0.74和0.76。Apple的R2分别为0.77、0.76和0.78,Garmin的R2分别为0.73、0.73和0.75,Fitbit的CSTS、GAMM和RF的R2分别为0.63、0.65和0.67。在所有其他评估指标中,观察到类似的模式,Fitbit表现最差,但建模方法与其他设备之间的差异很小。结论:除Fitbit外,来自消费者可穿戴设备的加速度计和HR数据与研究级设备的PAEE预测结果相当,并且在建模方法之间几乎没有可变性。这些结果支持在儿童PAEE评估中部署与消费者可穿戴设备无关的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging Accelerometry and Heart Rate Data from Consumer Wearables to Predict Physical Activity in Children: A Device Agnostic Approach.

Introduction: This study examined the potential of a device agnostic approach for predicting physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) from research-grade and consumer wearable accelerometry and heart rate (HR) raw data compared with indirect calorimetry in children.

Methods: Two hundred thirty-one 5- to 12-yr-olds (52.4% male) of diverse skin tone and body weights participated in a 60-min protocol with multiple activities at varying intensities. Children wore two of three consumer wearables (Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4S, Fitbit Sense) and a research-grade accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X) on their nondominant wrist, and a chest-placed, research-grade HR monitor (Actiheart 5, ECG), concurrently. Children also wore a K5 criterion measure of PAEE (i.e., COSMED K5). Cross-sectional time series (CSTS), generalized additive mixed effects model (GAMM), and random forest (RF) were used to estimate minute-by-minute PAEE from features extracted from raw accelerometry and HR data. Variance explained ( R2 ), in addition to other metrics, evaluated agreement between estimated and criterion measurements.

Results: For the research-grade devices (i.e., ActiGraph accelerometry and Actiheart HR), R2 values were 0.74, 0.74, and 0.76 for CSTS, GAMM, and RF, respectively. For Apple, R2 values were 0.77, 0.76, and 0.78; Garmin's values were 0.73, 0.73, and 0.75; and Fitbit's values were 0.63, 0.65, and 0.67 for CSTS, GAMM, and RF, respectively. Across all other evaluation metrics, a similar pattern was observed with Fitbit performing the worst but with little variability between the modeling approaches or the other devices.

Conclusions: Except for Fitbit, accelerometry and HR data from consumer wearables predicted PAEE comparably to research-grade devices, and there was little variability across modeling approach. These outcomes support deploying a consumer wearable device-agnostic approach for PAEE estimation in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信