评估YouTube作为体外膜氧合信息来源的质量和可靠性:呼吁专业人士发布更多高质量视频。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bekzhan A Permenov, Olena Zimba, Marlen Yessirkepov, Ainur B Qumar, Darkhan Suigenbayev, Burhan Fatih Kocyigit
{"title":"评估YouTube作为体外膜氧合信息来源的质量和可靠性:呼吁专业人士发布更多高质量视频。","authors":"Bekzhan A Permenov, Olena Zimba, Marlen Yessirkepov, Ainur B Qumar, Darkhan Suigenbayev, Burhan Fatih Kocyigit","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a medical intervention employed to provide life-sustaining support for patients. YouTube is a dynamic and widely utilized platform for distributing health-related information. The aim of this study was to evaluate ECMO-related videos on YouTube and assess the frequency of misleading information in the accumulation of ECMO videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On September 17, 2024, an in-depth examination on YouTube was conducted using search phrases \"Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation\" and \"ECMO treatment.\" The study included 55 selected videos. Video parameters and sources were analyzed. Content assessments were conducted utilizing the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN instrument, the <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i> (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio/Visual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). The authors conducted comparisons among quality groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 55 videos analyzed, 30.9% (n = 17) were categorized as low quality, 21.8% (n = 12) as intermediate quality, and 47.3% (n = 26) as high quality. Physicians (75%) provided the most high-quality videos. News outlets (83.3%) provided the most low-quality videos. No statistically significant difference was observed between quality groups in daily views, likes, and comments (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Significant correlations were identified between video duration and GQS (<i>r</i> = 0.585), modified DISCERN questionnaire (<i>r</i> = 0.557), JAMA Benchmark Criteria (<i>r</i> = 0.511), PEMAT-A/V Understandability (<i>r</i> = 0.530), and PEMAT-A/V Actionability scores (<i>r</i> = 0.433) (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for all correlation analyses).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a wide variety in the quality of YouTube ECMO videos. Although YouTube content created by physicians is more likely to provide accurate and beneficial information, substandard videos present a significant public health threat by disseminating misinformation. The critical role of quality control methods on social media platforms in ensuring the accurate and high-quality transmission of health-related information is readily evident.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 13","pages":"e34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Call to Publish More Quality Videos by Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Bekzhan A Permenov, Olena Zimba, Marlen Yessirkepov, Ainur B Qumar, Darkhan Suigenbayev, Burhan Fatih Kocyigit\",\"doi\":\"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a medical intervention employed to provide life-sustaining support for patients. YouTube is a dynamic and widely utilized platform for distributing health-related information. The aim of this study was to evaluate ECMO-related videos on YouTube and assess the frequency of misleading information in the accumulation of ECMO videos.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On September 17, 2024, an in-depth examination on YouTube was conducted using search phrases \\\"Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation\\\" and \\\"ECMO treatment.\\\" The study included 55 selected videos. Video parameters and sources were analyzed. Content assessments were conducted utilizing the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN instrument, the <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i> (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio/Visual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). The authors conducted comparisons among quality groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 55 videos analyzed, 30.9% (n = 17) were categorized as low quality, 21.8% (n = 12) as intermediate quality, and 47.3% (n = 26) as high quality. Physicians (75%) provided the most high-quality videos. News outlets (83.3%) provided the most low-quality videos. No statistically significant difference was observed between quality groups in daily views, likes, and comments (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Significant correlations were identified between video duration and GQS (<i>r</i> = 0.585), modified DISCERN questionnaire (<i>r</i> = 0.557), JAMA Benchmark Criteria (<i>r</i> = 0.511), PEMAT-A/V Understandability (<i>r</i> = 0.530), and PEMAT-A/V Actionability scores (<i>r</i> = 0.433) (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for all correlation analyses).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a wide variety in the quality of YouTube ECMO videos. Although YouTube content created by physicians is more likely to provide accurate and beneficial information, substandard videos present a significant public health threat by disseminating misinformation. The critical role of quality control methods on social media platforms in ensuring the accurate and high-quality transmission of health-related information is readily evident.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 13\",\"pages\":\"e34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e34\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e34","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体外膜氧合(Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO)是一种为患者提供生命维持支持的医疗干预手段。YouTube是一个动态的、被广泛使用的传播健康信息的平台。本研究的目的是评估YouTube上与ECMO相关的视频,并评估在ECMO视频积累中误导性信息的频率。方法:于2024年9月17日在YouTube上搜索“Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation”和“ECMO治疗”进行深入检查。该研究包括55个选定的视频。对视频参数和源进行了分析。内容评估采用全球质量量表(GQS)、改良的DISCERN仪器、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准和视听材料患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)进行。作者在质量组之间进行了比较。结果:在分析的55个视频中,30.9% (n = 17)为低质量,21.8% (n = 12)为中等质量,47.3% (n = 26)为高质量。医生(75%)提供的视频质量最高。新闻媒体(83.3%)提供的视频质量最差。质量组在每日观看、点赞和评论方面无统计学差异(P < 0.05)。视频时长与GQS (r = 0.585)、修改后的DISCERN问卷(r = 0.557)、JAMA基准标准(r = 0.511)、PEMAT-A/V可理解性(r = 0.530)和PEMAT-A/V可操作性评分(r = 0.433)之间存在显著相关性(所有相关分析均P < 0.001)。结论:YouTube ECMO视频质量参差不齐。虽然医生制作的YouTube内容更有可能提供准确和有益的信息,但不合格的视频传播错误信息,对公众健康构成重大威胁。社交媒体平台上的质量控制方法在确保准确和高质量地传播健康相关信息方面的关键作用是显而易见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Call to Publish More Quality Videos by Professionals.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a medical intervention employed to provide life-sustaining support for patients. YouTube is a dynamic and widely utilized platform for distributing health-related information. The aim of this study was to evaluate ECMO-related videos on YouTube and assess the frequency of misleading information in the accumulation of ECMO videos.

Methods: On September 17, 2024, an in-depth examination on YouTube was conducted using search phrases "Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation" and "ECMO treatment." The study included 55 selected videos. Video parameters and sources were analyzed. Content assessments were conducted utilizing the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio/Visual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). The authors conducted comparisons among quality groups.

Results: Among the 55 videos analyzed, 30.9% (n = 17) were categorized as low quality, 21.8% (n = 12) as intermediate quality, and 47.3% (n = 26) as high quality. Physicians (75%) provided the most high-quality videos. News outlets (83.3%) provided the most low-quality videos. No statistically significant difference was observed between quality groups in daily views, likes, and comments (P > 0.05). Significant correlations were identified between video duration and GQS (r = 0.585), modified DISCERN questionnaire (r = 0.557), JAMA Benchmark Criteria (r = 0.511), PEMAT-A/V Understandability (r = 0.530), and PEMAT-A/V Actionability scores (r = 0.433) (P < 0.001 for all correlation analyses).

Conclusion: There is a wide variety in the quality of YouTube ECMO videos. Although YouTube content created by physicians is more likely to provide accurate and beneficial information, substandard videos present a significant public health threat by disseminating misinformation. The critical role of quality control methods on social media platforms in ensuring the accurate and high-quality transmission of health-related information is readily evident.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信