[匈牙利ECR-R问卷的长、短版本的发展,用于测量全国代表性样本的成人浪漫依恋。]实际意义)。

Q4 Medicine
Psychiatria Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Kinga Dupont, Judit Gervai, Szabolcs Török, Ildikó Tóth, Ildikóc Danis
{"title":"[匈牙利ECR-R问卷的长、短版本的发展,用于测量全国代表性样本的成人浪漫依恋。]实际意义)。","authors":"Kinga Dupont, Judit Gervai, Szabolcs Török, Ildikó Tóth, Ildikóc Danis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We provide an overview of the development and validation of the Hungarian long (ECR-R-HU) and short (ECR-R-HU-SF) versions of the Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised (ECR-R) questionnaire on a nationally representative adult sample and highlight the practical applications of the measurement tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original ECR-R consists of 36 items, while the short form includes 8 items. Both versions have two subscales, Avoidance and Anxiety. Respondents rated the items on a 7-point Likert scale. We assessed the construct validity of the measurement tools using indicators of well-being and family functioning (depressive mood, perceived stress, well-being, and family functioning).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent with prior research, skewed distributions were observed in the Hungarian sample; both subscale scores skewed towards attachment security (low scores on both Avoidance and Anxiety). Risk cut-off values for both subscales were determined based on the 75th and 90th percentiles of the population data. Relationship status was the only sociodemographic factor that showed a significant effect across the subscales, with individuals not in a relationship reporting significantly higher scores on both Avoidance and Anxiety. Indicators used to assess construct validity showed weak to moderate correlations with both attachment subscales in the expected directions. These findings were further supported by analyses based on risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The long and short forms of the Hungarian version of the ECR-R are reliable and valid tools with established baseline distributions. We recommend them as scientific assessment tools and as practical instruments for screening and follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":35063,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Hungarica","volume":"39 4","pages":"333-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Development of the Long and Short Versions of the Hungarian ECR-R Questionnaire for Measuring Adult Romantic Attachment on a Nationally Representative Sample. Practical Implications].\",\"authors\":\"Kinga Dupont, Judit Gervai, Szabolcs Török, Ildikó Tóth, Ildikóc Danis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We provide an overview of the development and validation of the Hungarian long (ECR-R-HU) and short (ECR-R-HU-SF) versions of the Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised (ECR-R) questionnaire on a nationally representative adult sample and highlight the practical applications of the measurement tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The original ECR-R consists of 36 items, while the short form includes 8 items. Both versions have two subscales, Avoidance and Anxiety. Respondents rated the items on a 7-point Likert scale. We assessed the construct validity of the measurement tools using indicators of well-being and family functioning (depressive mood, perceived stress, well-being, and family functioning).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent with prior research, skewed distributions were observed in the Hungarian sample; both subscale scores skewed towards attachment security (low scores on both Avoidance and Anxiety). Risk cut-off values for both subscales were determined based on the 75th and 90th percentiles of the population data. Relationship status was the only sociodemographic factor that showed a significant effect across the subscales, with individuals not in a relationship reporting significantly higher scores on both Avoidance and Anxiety. Indicators used to assess construct validity showed weak to moderate correlations with both attachment subscales in the expected directions. These findings were further supported by analyses based on risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The long and short forms of the Hungarian version of the ECR-R are reliable and valid tools with established baseline distributions. We recommend them as scientific assessment tools and as practical instruments for screening and follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"333-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们概述了匈牙利长(ECR-R- hu)和短(ECR-R- hu - sf)版本的亲密关系经验-修订(ECR-R)问卷在全国代表性成人样本上的发展和验证,并强调了测量工具的实际应用。方法:ECR-R原表共36项,简表共8项。两个版本都有两个子量表,逃避和焦虑。受访者以7分的李克特量表对这些项目进行评分。我们使用幸福感和家庭功能指标(抑郁情绪、感知压力、幸福感和家庭功能)来评估测量工具的结构效度。结果:与先前的研究一致,在匈牙利样本中观察到偏态分布;两个分量表的得分都倾向于依恋安全(逃避和焦虑的得分都很低)。两个亚量表的风险临界值是根据人口数据的第75和90百分位数确定的。关系状态是唯一一个在各子量表中显示出显著影响的社会人口学因素,没有关系的个体在回避和焦虑方面的得分都明显更高。用于评估结构效度的指标显示,在预期方向上,两个依恋分量表之间存在弱至中度的相关性。基于风险群体的分析进一步支持了这些发现。结论:匈牙利版ECR-R的长、短形式是可靠和有效的工具,具有既定的基线分布。我们建议将它们作为科学评估工具和筛选和后续行动的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Development of the Long and Short Versions of the Hungarian ECR-R Questionnaire for Measuring Adult Romantic Attachment on a Nationally Representative Sample. Practical Implications].

Introduction: We provide an overview of the development and validation of the Hungarian long (ECR-R-HU) and short (ECR-R-HU-SF) versions of the Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised (ECR-R) questionnaire on a nationally representative adult sample and highlight the practical applications of the measurement tool.

Methods: The original ECR-R consists of 36 items, while the short form includes 8 items. Both versions have two subscales, Avoidance and Anxiety. Respondents rated the items on a 7-point Likert scale. We assessed the construct validity of the measurement tools using indicators of well-being and family functioning (depressive mood, perceived stress, well-being, and family functioning).

Results: Consistent with prior research, skewed distributions were observed in the Hungarian sample; both subscale scores skewed towards attachment security (low scores on both Avoidance and Anxiety). Risk cut-off values for both subscales were determined based on the 75th and 90th percentiles of the population data. Relationship status was the only sociodemographic factor that showed a significant effect across the subscales, with individuals not in a relationship reporting significantly higher scores on both Avoidance and Anxiety. Indicators used to assess construct validity showed weak to moderate correlations with both attachment subscales in the expected directions. These findings were further supported by analyses based on risk groups.

Conclusions: The long and short forms of the Hungarian version of the ECR-R are reliable and valid tools with established baseline distributions. We recommend them as scientific assessment tools and as practical instruments for screening and follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Hungarica
Psychiatria Hungarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信