{"title":"两到三岁的幼儿在优先注视的眼球追踪范式中区分认知动词“知道”和“思考”。","authors":"Lucie Zimmer, Beate Sodian, Nivedita Mani, Stella S Grosso, Susanne Kristen-Antonow, Tobias Schuwerk","doi":"10.1037/dev0001933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acquisition of mental language understanding is crucial for social-cognitive development. While there is evidence for the production of epistemic terms in the third year of life, the comprehension of different degrees of speaker (un-)certainty has not yet been systematically investigated at this age. In the present longitudinal study, we developed an eye-tracking task and measured preferential looking as an indicator of an implicit understanding of the epistemic verbs \"know\" and \"think\" in toddlers twice at the ages of 27 (<i>N</i> = 199) and 36 months (<i>N</i> = 131). Toddlers were faced with two agents who indicated the location of a hidden object (right vs. left box), with a narrator attributing contrasting degrees of certainty to their statements (\"know\" vs. \"think\") before asking the toddlers about the object's location. We measured the extent to which children fixated the box associated with the agent described as knowing the target's location. At both 27 and 36 months of age, we observed systematic differences in their looking behavior toward this box across the trial. Children appeared to display a spontaneous preference for the box associated with the agent who knew the target's location, relative to the agent who only thought the target was in their box in the prequestioning phase. Subsequently, their preference switched in the postquestioning phase; however, this effect was smaller. These results indicate that toddlers in their third year of life distinguish different degrees of speaker (un-)certainty, expressed by the verbs \"know\" and \"think.\" (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two- to three-year-old toddlers differentiate the epistemic verbs \\\"know\\\" and \\\"think\\\" in a preferential looking eye-tracking paradigm.\",\"authors\":\"Lucie Zimmer, Beate Sodian, Nivedita Mani, Stella S Grosso, Susanne Kristen-Antonow, Tobias Schuwerk\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dev0001933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The acquisition of mental language understanding is crucial for social-cognitive development. While there is evidence for the production of epistemic terms in the third year of life, the comprehension of different degrees of speaker (un-)certainty has not yet been systematically investigated at this age. In the present longitudinal study, we developed an eye-tracking task and measured preferential looking as an indicator of an implicit understanding of the epistemic verbs \\\"know\\\" and \\\"think\\\" in toddlers twice at the ages of 27 (<i>N</i> = 199) and 36 months (<i>N</i> = 131). Toddlers were faced with two agents who indicated the location of a hidden object (right vs. left box), with a narrator attributing contrasting degrees of certainty to their statements (\\\"know\\\" vs. \\\"think\\\") before asking the toddlers about the object's location. We measured the extent to which children fixated the box associated with the agent described as knowing the target's location. At both 27 and 36 months of age, we observed systematic differences in their looking behavior toward this box across the trial. Children appeared to display a spontaneous preference for the box associated with the agent who knew the target's location, relative to the agent who only thought the target was in their box in the prequestioning phase. Subsequently, their preference switched in the postquestioning phase; however, this effect was smaller. These results indicate that toddlers in their third year of life distinguish different degrees of speaker (un-)certainty, expressed by the verbs \\\"know\\\" and \\\"think.\\\" (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001933\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001933","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心理语言理解的习得对社会认知的发展至关重要。虽然有证据表明在生命的第三年产生认知术语,但对不同程度的说话者(不确定性)的理解尚未在这个年龄段进行系统的调查。在本纵向研究中,我们开发了一项眼球追踪任务,并测量了优先注视作为27岁(N = 199)和36个月(N = 131)幼儿对认知动词“知道”和“思考”内隐理解的指标。幼儿面对两个指示隐藏物体位置的代理人(右框vs左框),叙述者将不同程度的确定性归因于他们的陈述(“知道”vs“知道”)。“思考”),然后再问孩子物体的位置。我们测量了孩子们注视盒子的程度,盒子与被描述为知道目标位置的代理有关。在27个月和36个月大的时候,我们观察到他们在整个试验中对这个盒子的观察行为的系统性差异。孩子们似乎表现出一种自发的偏好,即与知道目标位置的人有关的盒子,相对于在提问前阶段只知道目标在他们的盒子里的人。随后,他们的偏好在提问后阶段发生转变;然而,这种影响较小。这些结果表明,三岁的幼儿区分不同程度的说话者(不)确定性,通过动词“知道”和“思考”来表达。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Two- to three-year-old toddlers differentiate the epistemic verbs "know" and "think" in a preferential looking eye-tracking paradigm.
The acquisition of mental language understanding is crucial for social-cognitive development. While there is evidence for the production of epistemic terms in the third year of life, the comprehension of different degrees of speaker (un-)certainty has not yet been systematically investigated at this age. In the present longitudinal study, we developed an eye-tracking task and measured preferential looking as an indicator of an implicit understanding of the epistemic verbs "know" and "think" in toddlers twice at the ages of 27 (N = 199) and 36 months (N = 131). Toddlers were faced with two agents who indicated the location of a hidden object (right vs. left box), with a narrator attributing contrasting degrees of certainty to their statements ("know" vs. "think") before asking the toddlers about the object's location. We measured the extent to which children fixated the box associated with the agent described as knowing the target's location. At both 27 and 36 months of age, we observed systematic differences in their looking behavior toward this box across the trial. Children appeared to display a spontaneous preference for the box associated with the agent who knew the target's location, relative to the agent who only thought the target was in their box in the prequestioning phase. Subsequently, their preference switched in the postquestioning phase; however, this effect was smaller. These results indicate that toddlers in their third year of life distinguish different degrees of speaker (un-)certainty, expressed by the verbs "know" and "think." (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.