准分子激光冠状动脉成形术与球囊血管成形术在支架内再狭窄患者中的降压(ELDISR研究):一项随机对照试验

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Pan He, Haiwei Chen, Junjie Yang, Lei Gao, Jun Guo, Yundai Chen, Qi Wang
{"title":"准分子激光冠状动脉成形术与球囊血管成形术在支架内再狭窄患者中的降压(ELDISR研究):一项随机对照试验","authors":"Pan He,&nbsp;Haiwei Chen,&nbsp;Junjie Yang,&nbsp;Lei Gao,&nbsp;Jun Guo,&nbsp;Yundai Chen,&nbsp;Qi Wang","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) is a safe and effective method for lesion preparation. However, its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) undergoing drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of ELCA-based lesion preparation on the clinical outcomes of ISR patients treated with standard DCB angioplasty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with ISR were randomized 1:1 to either ELCA (+) or ELCA (−). The ELCA (+) group received ELCA for lesion preparation followed by standard DCB angioplasty, while the ELCA (−) group received standard DCB angioplasty alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year. Safety was also evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 110 patients were randomized to either the ELCA (+) group (<i>n</i> = 55) or the ELCA (−) group (<i>n</i> = 55). The mean age of the study participants was 64.5 years, 89 (80.9%) were men and 51 (46.4%) had diabetes mellitus. The procedure was successful in all patients. The primary endpoint event occurred in five patients (cumulative incidence, 9.1%) in the ELCA (+) group and in 13 patients (cumulative incidence, 23.6%) in the ELCA (−) group (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.038).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Lesion preparation with ELCA before DCB angioplasty is a safe and effective strategy for patients with ISR, associated with a lower incidence of TLR compared to standard DCB angioplasty alone. However, due to the limited sample size and single-center design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation requires confirmation through multicenter studies with larger patient populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>Unique identifier: ChiCTR2300068962.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":"57 4","pages":"329-338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debulking With Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With in Stent Restenosis (ELDISR Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Pan He,&nbsp;Haiwei Chen,&nbsp;Junjie Yang,&nbsp;Lei Gao,&nbsp;Jun Guo,&nbsp;Yundai Chen,&nbsp;Qi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lsm.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) is a safe and effective method for lesion preparation. However, its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) undergoing drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of ELCA-based lesion preparation on the clinical outcomes of ISR patients treated with standard DCB angioplasty.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with ISR were randomized 1:1 to either ELCA (+) or ELCA (−). The ELCA (+) group received ELCA for lesion preparation followed by standard DCB angioplasty, while the ELCA (−) group received standard DCB angioplasty alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year. Safety was also evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 110 patients were randomized to either the ELCA (+) group (<i>n</i> = 55) or the ELCA (−) group (<i>n</i> = 55). The mean age of the study participants was 64.5 years, 89 (80.9%) were men and 51 (46.4%) had diabetes mellitus. The procedure was successful in all patients. The primary endpoint event occurred in five patients (cumulative incidence, 9.1%) in the ELCA (+) group and in 13 patients (cumulative incidence, 23.6%) in the ELCA (−) group (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.038).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lesion preparation with ELCA before DCB angioplasty is a safe and effective strategy for patients with ISR, associated with a lower incidence of TLR compared to standard DCB angioplasty alone. However, due to the limited sample size and single-center design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation requires confirmation through multicenter studies with larger patient populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>Unique identifier: ChiCTR2300068962.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"329-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.70013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.70013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准分子激光冠状动脉成形术(ELCA)是一种安全有效的病变准备方法。然而,它对支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者接受药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术的临床结果的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估基于elca的病变准备对标准DCB血管成形术治疗ISR患者临床结果的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性、单中心、随机对照试验中,ISR患者以1:1的比例随机分为ELCA(+)组和ELCA(-)组。ELCA(+)组行ELCA病变准备后再行标准DCB血管成形术,而ELCA(-)组仅行标准DCB血管成形术。主要终点是1年内靶病变血运重建率(TLR)。安全性也进行了评估。结果:共有110例患者被随机分为ELCA(+)组(n = 55)和ELCA(-)组(n = 55)。研究参与者的平均年龄为64.5岁,89人(80.9%)为男性,51人(46.4%)患有糖尿病。所有病人的手术都很成功。主要终点事件发生在ELCA(+)组的5例患者(累积发生率,9.1%)和ELCA(-)组的13例患者(累积发生率,23.6%)(HR, 0.38;95% ci, 0.15-0.95;p = 0.038)。结论:对于ISR患者,在DCB血管成形术前使用ELCA进行病变准备是一种安全有效的策略,与单独使用标准DCB血管成形术相比,TLR的发生率较低。然而,由于有限的样本量和单中心设计,这些发现应该被认为是假设生成。未来的验证需要通过更多患者群体的多中心研究来确认。试验注册:唯一标识符:ChiCTR2300068962。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debulking With Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With in Stent Restenosis (ELDISR Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) is a safe and effective method for lesion preparation. However, its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) undergoing drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of ELCA-based lesion preparation on the clinical outcomes of ISR patients treated with standard DCB angioplasty.

Methods

In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with ISR were randomized 1:1 to either ELCA (+) or ELCA (−). The ELCA (+) group received ELCA for lesion preparation followed by standard DCB angioplasty, while the ELCA (−) group received standard DCB angioplasty alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year. Safety was also evaluated.

Results

A total of 110 patients were randomized to either the ELCA (+) group (n = 55) or the ELCA (−) group (n = 55). The mean age of the study participants was 64.5 years, 89 (80.9%) were men and 51 (46.4%) had diabetes mellitus. The procedure was successful in all patients. The primary endpoint event occurred in five patients (cumulative incidence, 9.1%) in the ELCA (+) group and in 13 patients (cumulative incidence, 23.6%) in the ELCA (−) group (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.95; p = 0.038).

Conclusions

Lesion preparation with ELCA before DCB angioplasty is a safe and effective strategy for patients with ISR, associated with a lower incidence of TLR compared to standard DCB angioplasty alone. However, due to the limited sample size and single-center design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Future validation requires confirmation through multicenter studies with larger patient populations.

Trial Registration

Unique identifier: ChiCTR2300068962.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信