Victor Danzinger, Daniel Schartmüller, Marcus Lisy, Markus Schranz, Claudette Abela-Formanek, Rupert Menapace, Christina Leydolt
{"title":"球形单焦点人工晶状体和增强单焦点人工晶状体在中近视力中的前瞻性眼内比较。","authors":"Victor Danzinger, Daniel Schartmüller, Marcus Lisy, Markus Schranz, Claudette Abela-Formanek, Rupert Menapace, Christina Leydolt","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250307-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare monocular visual performance of a spherical and an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) after combined implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study comprised 50 patients (100 eyes) with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of the spherical Sensar AAB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision) in the dominant eye and the enhanced monofocal Eyhance ICB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision) in the non-dominant eye. Postoperative assessment compared monocular CDVA, CNVA, DCIVA, DCNVA, low contrast visual acuities, defocus curves, wavefront aberrometry, decentration, tilt, and the 7-item Visual Function Index (VF-7) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monocular DCIVA at 66 cm (spherical: 0.33 ± 0.13 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.37 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), <i>P</i> = .007), DCIVA at 80 cm (spherical: 0.24 ± 0.12 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.31 ± 0.11 logMAR, <i>P</i> < .001), and DCNVA at 40 cm (spherical: 0.49 ± 0.17 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.56 ± 0.13, <i>P</i> = .003) increased significantly with the enhanced monofocal IOL. Similarly, monocular low contrast intermediate (<i>P</i> = .048) and corrected (<i>P</i> = .006) near vision were better in the enhanced monofocal group. Defocus curves from -0.25 to -1.50 D (<i>P</i> < .05) and internal spherical aberrations Z(4,0) (<i>P</i> < .001) differed between the two IOLs. CDVA, decentration, and tilt were comparable (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This fellow-eye study demonstrated significant differences between the enhanced monofocal IOL and the spherical IOL. Visual improvements with the enhanced monofocal IOL were modest for both intermediate and near vision. There was no significant difference in distance vision, decentration, or tilt, and higher order aberrations were low. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(4):e382-e390.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 4","pages":"e382-e390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Fellow-Eye Comparison of a Spherical Monofocal and an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Intermediate and Near Vision.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Danzinger, Daniel Schartmüller, Marcus Lisy, Markus Schranz, Claudette Abela-Formanek, Rupert Menapace, Christina Leydolt\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250307-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare monocular visual performance of a spherical and an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) after combined implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study comprised 50 patients (100 eyes) with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of the spherical Sensar AAB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision) in the dominant eye and the enhanced monofocal Eyhance ICB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision) in the non-dominant eye. Postoperative assessment compared monocular CDVA, CNVA, DCIVA, DCNVA, low contrast visual acuities, defocus curves, wavefront aberrometry, decentration, tilt, and the 7-item Visual Function Index (VF-7) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monocular DCIVA at 66 cm (spherical: 0.33 ± 0.13 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.37 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), <i>P</i> = .007), DCIVA at 80 cm (spherical: 0.24 ± 0.12 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.31 ± 0.11 logMAR, <i>P</i> < .001), and DCNVA at 40 cm (spherical: 0.49 ± 0.17 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.56 ± 0.13, <i>P</i> = .003) increased significantly with the enhanced monofocal IOL. Similarly, monocular low contrast intermediate (<i>P</i> = .048) and corrected (<i>P</i> = .006) near vision were better in the enhanced monofocal group. Defocus curves from -0.25 to -1.50 D (<i>P</i> < .05) and internal spherical aberrations Z(4,0) (<i>P</i> < .001) differed between the two IOLs. CDVA, decentration, and tilt were comparable (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This fellow-eye study demonstrated significant differences between the enhanced monofocal IOL and the spherical IOL. Visual improvements with the enhanced monofocal IOL were modest for both intermediate and near vision. There was no significant difference in distance vision, decentration, or tilt, and higher order aberrations were low. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(4):e382-e390.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"e382-e390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250307-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250307-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较球形人工晶状体与增强型人工晶状体联合植入术后的单眼视觉性能。方法:本前瞻性研究包括50例(100眼)双侧白内障手术患者,在优势眼植入球形Sensar AAB00人工晶体(Johnson & Johnson Vision),在非优势眼植入增强单焦点Eyhance ICB00人工晶体(Johnson & Johnson Vision)。术后评估比较单眼CDVA、CNVA、DCIVA、DCNVA、低对比视力、离焦曲线、波前像差、分散、倾斜和7项视觉功能指数(VF-7)问卷。结果:66 cm处单眼DCIVA(球形:0.33±0.13 vs增强单焦:0.37±0.13最小分辨角对数(logMAR), P = 0.007)、80 cm处DCIVA(球形:0.24±0.12 vs增强单焦:0.31±0.11 logMAR, P < 0.001)、40 cm处DCNVA(球形:0.49±0.17 vs增强单焦:0.56±0.13,P = 0.003)均随增强单焦人工晶体植入而显著升高。同样,增强单焦点组的单眼低对比中等视力(P = 0.048)和矫正近视力(P = 0.006)较好。离焦曲线为-0.25 ~ -1.50 D (P < 0.05),内球像差Z(4,0) (P < 0.001)。CDVA、去中心化和倾斜具有可比性(P < 0.05)。结论:本研究显示增强单焦点人工晶状体与球形人工晶状体之间存在显著差异。增强单焦点人工晶状体对中视力和近视力的改善都不大。两组患者在远视、偏心、倾斜等方面无显著差异,高阶像差较低。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(4):382- 390。
Prospective Fellow-Eye Comparison of a Spherical Monofocal and an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Intermediate and Near Vision.
Purpose: To compare monocular visual performance of a spherical and an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) after combined implantation.
Methods: This prospective study comprised 50 patients (100 eyes) with bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of the spherical Sensar AAB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision) in the dominant eye and the enhanced monofocal Eyhance ICB00 IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision) in the non-dominant eye. Postoperative assessment compared monocular CDVA, CNVA, DCIVA, DCNVA, low contrast visual acuities, defocus curves, wavefront aberrometry, decentration, tilt, and the 7-item Visual Function Index (VF-7) questionnaire.
Results: Monocular DCIVA at 66 cm (spherical: 0.33 ± 0.13 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.37 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), P = .007), DCIVA at 80 cm (spherical: 0.24 ± 0.12 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.31 ± 0.11 logMAR, P < .001), and DCNVA at 40 cm (spherical: 0.49 ± 0.17 vs enhanced monofocal: 0.56 ± 0.13, P = .003) increased significantly with the enhanced monofocal IOL. Similarly, monocular low contrast intermediate (P = .048) and corrected (P = .006) near vision were better in the enhanced monofocal group. Defocus curves from -0.25 to -1.50 D (P < .05) and internal spherical aberrations Z(4,0) (P < .001) differed between the two IOLs. CDVA, decentration, and tilt were comparable (P > .05).
Conclusions: This fellow-eye study demonstrated significant differences between the enhanced monofocal IOL and the spherical IOL. Visual improvements with the enhanced monofocal IOL were modest for both intermediate and near vision. There was no significant difference in distance vision, decentration, or tilt, and higher order aberrations were low. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(4):e382-e390.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.