超过100万例LASIK手术中皮瓣丢失:发生率、处理和视力结果。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Julio Ortega-Usobiaga, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig, Fernando Mayordomo-Cerda, Andrea Llovet-Rausell, Jaime Beltrán-Sanz, Kangjun Li, Julio Baviera-Sabater, Fernando Llovet-Osuna
{"title":"超过100万例LASIK手术中皮瓣丢失:发生率、处理和视力结果。","authors":"Julio Ortega-Usobiaga, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig, Fernando Mayordomo-Cerda, Andrea Llovet-Rausell, Jaime Beltrán-Sanz, Kangjun Li, Julio Baviera-Sabater, Fernando Llovet-Osuna","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250219-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the incidence of flap loss in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), management of this complication, and visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, multisurgeon, single-protocol, retrospective case series study enrolled patients who had undergone LASIK and experienced flap loss. Patients were operated on using a Moria LSKONE or a Moria One-Use-Plus-SBK microkeratome (Microtech Inc, Moria Ophthalmic Instruments). The study assessed uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (accuracy to the intended target), safety (change in Snellen lines of CDVA), and efficacy (difference between UDVA and CDVA). A control group was created to compare refractive outcomes, predictability, safety, and efficacy for eyes with flap loss and patients whose LASIK procedure was free of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 1,008,849 eyes. Flap loss occurred in 16 eyes from 16 patients. Patients received topical mitomycin C (MMC) after flap loss in 9 cases (7 did not receive MMC). A bandage contact lens was applied in all 9 cases. Mean UDVA was significantly worse in the group of patients with a flap loss (<i>P</i> = .013), although the difference in CDVA was not (<i>P</i> = .077). Both the mean efficacy index and the mean safety index were significantly worse in patients with flap loss (<i>P</i> = .004 and .02, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flap loss is an extremely rare complication after LASIK. It can be managed with MMC and a bandage contact lens, with a reasonable safety index and visual outcomes. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(4):e318-e324.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 4","pages":"e318-e324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flap Loss in More Than 1 Million LASIK Procedures: Incidence, Management, and Visual Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Julio Ortega-Usobiaga, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig, Fernando Mayordomo-Cerda, Andrea Llovet-Rausell, Jaime Beltrán-Sanz, Kangjun Li, Julio Baviera-Sabater, Fernando Llovet-Osuna\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250219-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the incidence of flap loss in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), management of this complication, and visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, multisurgeon, single-protocol, retrospective case series study enrolled patients who had undergone LASIK and experienced flap loss. Patients were operated on using a Moria LSKONE or a Moria One-Use-Plus-SBK microkeratome (Microtech Inc, Moria Ophthalmic Instruments). The study assessed uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (accuracy to the intended target), safety (change in Snellen lines of CDVA), and efficacy (difference between UDVA and CDVA). A control group was created to compare refractive outcomes, predictability, safety, and efficacy for eyes with flap loss and patients whose LASIK procedure was free of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 1,008,849 eyes. Flap loss occurred in 16 eyes from 16 patients. Patients received topical mitomycin C (MMC) after flap loss in 9 cases (7 did not receive MMC). A bandage contact lens was applied in all 9 cases. Mean UDVA was significantly worse in the group of patients with a flap loss (<i>P</i> = .013), although the difference in CDVA was not (<i>P</i> = .077). Both the mean efficacy index and the mean safety index were significantly worse in patients with flap loss (<i>P</i> = .004 and .02, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flap loss is an extremely rare complication after LASIK. It can be managed with MMC and a bandage contact lens, with a reasonable safety index and visual outcomes. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(4):e318-e324.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"e318-e324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250219-01\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250219-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析激光原位角膜磨磨术(LASIK)术后皮瓣丢失的发生率、处理方法及视力结果。方法:本研究采用多中心、多外科医生、单一方案、回顾性病例系列研究,纳入了接受LASIK手术并经历皮瓣丢失的患者。患者使用Moria LSKONE或Moria One-Use-Plus-SBK微角膜刀(Microtech Inc ., Moria Ophthalmic Instruments)进行手术。该研究评估了未矫正距离视力(UDVA)、矫正距离视力(CDVA)、可预测性(达到预期目标的准确性)、安全性(CDVA的斯奈伦线变化)和有效性(UDVA和CDVA的差异)。建立一个对照组,比较角膜瓣丢失和LASIK手术无并发症患者的屈光结果、可预测性、安全性和有效性。结果:共纳入1008,849只眼。16例患者16眼发生皮瓣丢失。9例患者在皮瓣丢失后接受局部丝裂霉素C (MMC)治疗(7例未接受MMC治疗)。9例均采用绷带隐形眼镜。瓣丢失组的平均UDVA明显更差(P = 0.013),但CDVA差异无统计学意义(P = 0.077)。皮瓣缺失患者的平均疗效指数和平均安全指数均明显较差(P值分别为0.004和0.02)。结论:皮瓣丢失是LASIK术后极为罕见的并发症。可采用MMC和绷带隐形眼镜治疗,具有合理的安全指数和视觉效果。[J].中国光学精密工程,2015;41(4):318- 324。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flap Loss in More Than 1 Million LASIK Procedures: Incidence, Management, and Visual Outcomes.

Purpose: To analyze the incidence of flap loss in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), management of this complication, and visual outcomes.

Methods: This multicenter, multisurgeon, single-protocol, retrospective case series study enrolled patients who had undergone LASIK and experienced flap loss. Patients were operated on using a Moria LSKONE or a Moria One-Use-Plus-SBK microkeratome (Microtech Inc, Moria Ophthalmic Instruments). The study assessed uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability (accuracy to the intended target), safety (change in Snellen lines of CDVA), and efficacy (difference between UDVA and CDVA). A control group was created to compare refractive outcomes, predictability, safety, and efficacy for eyes with flap loss and patients whose LASIK procedure was free of complications.

Results: The analysis included 1,008,849 eyes. Flap loss occurred in 16 eyes from 16 patients. Patients received topical mitomycin C (MMC) after flap loss in 9 cases (7 did not receive MMC). A bandage contact lens was applied in all 9 cases. Mean UDVA was significantly worse in the group of patients with a flap loss (P = .013), although the difference in CDVA was not (P = .077). Both the mean efficacy index and the mean safety index were significantly worse in patients with flap loss (P = .004 and .02, respectively).

Conclusions: Flap loss is an extremely rare complication after LASIK. It can be managed with MMC and a bandage contact lens, with a reasonable safety index and visual outcomes. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(4):e318-e324.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信