对赞赏的测量使ea - si -一种短量表的发展,用于测量工作中社会互动中的经验赞赏。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1465512
Maximilian Stefan Resch, Elena Nagelmann, Henrik Bellhäuser
{"title":"对赞赏的测量使ea - si -一种短量表的发展,用于测量工作中社会互动中的经验赞赏。","authors":"Maximilian Stefan Resch, Elena Nagelmann, Henrik Bellhäuser","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1465512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experienced appreciation at work is incongruently defined and measured in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article aims to give an overview of different definitions and measures of experienced appreciation at work to clarify the confusing state of research. Then, the new construct, Experienced Appreciation in Social Interactions (EA-SI) at Work, is introduced to counter the incongruency in defining experienced appreciation at work and to provide a reliable and comparable operationalization of the construct. In a second step, the article aims to develop and validate a short scale to measure EA-SI more time-efficiently. To do so, the instrument is derived from the original EA-SI Work Scale considering confirmatory factor analyses, artificial intelligence, and the evaluation of naïve and expert judges based on a sample of <i>N</i> = 391 employees. Subsequently, the EA-SI Work Scale (short) - including <i>k</i> = 4 items each for colleagues and supervisors as a source of experienced appreciation - is validated in a second independent sample with <i>N</i> = 323 participants. The assumptions of its theoretical framework (the Stress as Offense to Self-theory) and the relations between EA-SI and employee work engagement and burnout were tested to validate the short scale. Additionally, its internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity were determined. Social support was added as a control variable to test for EA-SI's incremental predictive value. The results highlight the unidimensional structure of EA-SI and point toward high reliability and validity of the short scale. Conclusively, the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1465512"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring appreciation made EA-SI-the development of a short scale to measure experienced appreciation in social interactions at work.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Stefan Resch, Elena Nagelmann, Henrik Bellhäuser\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1465512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Experienced appreciation at work is incongruently defined and measured in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article aims to give an overview of different definitions and measures of experienced appreciation at work to clarify the confusing state of research. Then, the new construct, Experienced Appreciation in Social Interactions (EA-SI) at Work, is introduced to counter the incongruency in defining experienced appreciation at work and to provide a reliable and comparable operationalization of the construct. In a second step, the article aims to develop and validate a short scale to measure EA-SI more time-efficiently. To do so, the instrument is derived from the original EA-SI Work Scale considering confirmatory factor analyses, artificial intelligence, and the evaluation of naïve and expert judges based on a sample of <i>N</i> = 391 employees. Subsequently, the EA-SI Work Scale (short) - including <i>k</i> = 4 items each for colleagues and supervisors as a source of experienced appreciation - is validated in a second independent sample with <i>N</i> = 323 participants. The assumptions of its theoretical framework (the Stress as Offense to Self-theory) and the relations between EA-SI and employee work engagement and burnout were tested to validate the short scale. Additionally, its internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity were determined. Social support was added as a control variable to test for EA-SI's incremental predictive value. The results highlight the unidimensional structure of EA-SI and point toward high reliability and validity of the short scale. Conclusively, the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1465512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1465512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1465512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科学文献中,工作中有经验的欣赏是不一致的。因此,本文旨在概述工作中经验欣赏的不同定义和衡量标准,以澄清研究的混乱状态。然后,引入了新的结构,工作中的社会互动中的经验欣赏(EA-SI),以抵消定义工作中的经验欣赏的不一致性,并提供可靠和可比较的结构操作化。在第二步中,本文旨在开发和验证一个更有效地测量EA-SI的短尺度。为此,该工具是从原始的EA-SI工作量表中衍生出来的,考虑了验证性因素分析、人工智能以及基于N = 391名员工样本的naïve和专家法官的评估。随后,EA-SI工作量表(简称)——包括k = 为同事和主管提供的4个项目,作为经验赞赏的来源——在第二个独立样本(N = 323名参与者)中得到验证。对其理论框架(压力对自我的冒犯理论)的假设以及EA-SI与员工工作敬业度和倦怠的关系进行检验,以验证短量表的有效性。并对其内部一致性、收敛性和判别效度进行了检验。加入社会支持作为控制变量,检验EA-SI的增量预测值。结果表明,EA-SI量表具有较强的单维结构,具有较高的信度和效度。最后,讨论了研究结果的局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring appreciation made EA-SI-the development of a short scale to measure experienced appreciation in social interactions at work.

Experienced appreciation at work is incongruently defined and measured in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article aims to give an overview of different definitions and measures of experienced appreciation at work to clarify the confusing state of research. Then, the new construct, Experienced Appreciation in Social Interactions (EA-SI) at Work, is introduced to counter the incongruency in defining experienced appreciation at work and to provide a reliable and comparable operationalization of the construct. In a second step, the article aims to develop and validate a short scale to measure EA-SI more time-efficiently. To do so, the instrument is derived from the original EA-SI Work Scale considering confirmatory factor analyses, artificial intelligence, and the evaluation of naïve and expert judges based on a sample of N = 391 employees. Subsequently, the EA-SI Work Scale (short) - including k = 4 items each for colleagues and supervisors as a source of experienced appreciation - is validated in a second independent sample with N = 323 participants. The assumptions of its theoretical framework (the Stress as Offense to Self-theory) and the relations between EA-SI and employee work engagement and burnout were tested to validate the short scale. Additionally, its internal consistency, convergent, and discriminant validity were determined. Social support was added as a control variable to test for EA-SI's incremental predictive value. The results highlight the unidimensional structure of EA-SI and point toward high reliability and validity of the short scale. Conclusively, the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信