{"title":"抗运动和动态核心训练后的神经肌肉激活:一项随机对照比较研究。","authors":"Fahri Safa Cinarli, Muhammed Emin Kafkas","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05768-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the effects of anti-movement and dynamic core training on neuromuscular activation in trained men using surface electromyography (sEMG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six participants were randomized into the anti-movement (AMG), traditional dynamic (TDG), or control (CG) groups in a controlled study. Training groups performed core exercises twice weekly for 6 weeks, with standardized time under tension (AMG: 30-s isometric holds; TDG: 30 s with 12 repetitions). Anterior and posterior trunk muscle activation was measured using sEMG during isometric endurance tests pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant time and interaction effects were observed for lumbar erector spinae (LES) activation (F = 3.784, p = 0.029), with AMG (p = 0.016) and TDG (p = 0.004) outperforming CG. A significant enhancement in external oblique (EO; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.17, p = 0.023) and internal oblique (IO; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.30, p = 0.003) activation was observed in the AMG compared to the CG. Both training groups improved LES (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.37, p = 0.001) and multifidus (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.19, p = 0.016) activation (p < 0.017). Within-group analysis showed significant pre-to-post improvements across all muscles (p < 0.05, effect size r = 0.48-0.63). Greater reductions in muscle activation (22.17%-53%) were demonstrated by the AMG compared to the TDG (16.18%-28.82%), suggesting improved neuromuscular efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-movement core training effectively enhances trunk muscle neuromuscular activation and efficiency, providing a robust alternative to traditional protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromuscular activation following anti-movement and dynamic core training: a randomized controlled comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Fahri Safa Cinarli, Muhammed Emin Kafkas\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05768-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the effects of anti-movement and dynamic core training on neuromuscular activation in trained men using surface electromyography (sEMG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six participants were randomized into the anti-movement (AMG), traditional dynamic (TDG), or control (CG) groups in a controlled study. Training groups performed core exercises twice weekly for 6 weeks, with standardized time under tension (AMG: 30-s isometric holds; TDG: 30 s with 12 repetitions). Anterior and posterior trunk muscle activation was measured using sEMG during isometric endurance tests pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant time and interaction effects were observed for lumbar erector spinae (LES) activation (F = 3.784, p = 0.029), with AMG (p = 0.016) and TDG (p = 0.004) outperforming CG. A significant enhancement in external oblique (EO; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.17, p = 0.023) and internal oblique (IO; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.30, p = 0.003) activation was observed in the AMG compared to the CG. Both training groups improved LES (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.37, p = 0.001) and multifidus (η<sup>2</sup> = 0.19, p = 0.016) activation (p < 0.017). Within-group analysis showed significant pre-to-post improvements across all muscles (p < 0.05, effect size r = 0.48-0.63). Greater reductions in muscle activation (22.17%-53%) were demonstrated by the AMG compared to the TDG (16.18%-28.82%), suggesting improved neuromuscular efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-movement core training effectively enhances trunk muscle neuromuscular activation and efficiency, providing a robust alternative to traditional protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05768-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05768-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究利用表面肌电图(sEMG)研究了抗运动和动态核心训练对训练后男性神经肌肉激活的影响。方法:将36名受试者随机分为抗运动组(AMG)、传统动力组(TDG)和对照组(CG)进行对照研究。训练组每周进行两次核心训练,持续6周,在压力下进行标准化时间(AMG: 30秒等距保持;TDG: 30秒,重复12次)。在干预前和干预后的等长耐力测试中,使用肌电图测量前、后躯干肌肉的激活情况。结果:观察到腰竖脊肌(LES)激活的显著时间和交互效应(F = 3.784, p = 0.029),其中AMG (p = 0.016)和TDG (p = 0.004)优于CG。外斜位(EO)显著增强;η2 = 0.17, p = 0.023)和内斜(IO;η2 = 0.30, p = 0.003), AMG比CG活化。结论:抗运动核心训练可有效提高躯干神经肌肉的激活和效率,为传统训练方案提供了强有力的替代方案。
Neuromuscular activation following anti-movement and dynamic core training: a randomized controlled comparative study.
Background: This study investigated the effects of anti-movement and dynamic core training on neuromuscular activation in trained men using surface electromyography (sEMG).
Methods: Thirty-six participants were randomized into the anti-movement (AMG), traditional dynamic (TDG), or control (CG) groups in a controlled study. Training groups performed core exercises twice weekly for 6 weeks, with standardized time under tension (AMG: 30-s isometric holds; TDG: 30 s with 12 repetitions). Anterior and posterior trunk muscle activation was measured using sEMG during isometric endurance tests pre- and post-intervention.
Results: Significant time and interaction effects were observed for lumbar erector spinae (LES) activation (F = 3.784, p = 0.029), with AMG (p = 0.016) and TDG (p = 0.004) outperforming CG. A significant enhancement in external oblique (EO; η2 = 0.17, p = 0.023) and internal oblique (IO; η2 = 0.30, p = 0.003) activation was observed in the AMG compared to the CG. Both training groups improved LES (η2 = 0.37, p = 0.001) and multifidus (η2 = 0.19, p = 0.016) activation (p < 0.017). Within-group analysis showed significant pre-to-post improvements across all muscles (p < 0.05, effect size r = 0.48-0.63). Greater reductions in muscle activation (22.17%-53%) were demonstrated by the AMG compared to the TDG (16.18%-28.82%), suggesting improved neuromuscular efficiency.
Conclusion: Anti-movement core training effectively enhances trunk muscle neuromuscular activation and efficiency, providing a robust alternative to traditional protocols.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.