晚年抑郁知识问卷(LLD-KQ):开发与初步验证。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Abigail J Laine, Kamila S White, Ann M Steffen
{"title":"晚年抑郁知识问卷(LLD-KQ):开发与初步验证。","authors":"Abigail J Laine, Kamila S White, Ann M Steffen","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2488953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Later life depression is an important mental health concern requiring knowledge and skill competencies for behavioral health providers. This study developed and evaluated the initial validity of the Later Life Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (LLD-KQ) as a measure of clinical knowledge of later life depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Domain identification, item generation, and content validity were first explored with five geropsychologists. Initially drafted questions were pre-tested with 10 additional geropsychologists. A pool of prospective survey items was administered to licensed masters-level social workers (<i>n</i> = 300) for individual item examination, confirmatory factor analyses testing 1- and 3-factor models, and initial estimates of reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the pool of items pertaining to three identified domains (i.e. psychopathology, assessment/diagnosis, and treatment), 25 items were retained for the final LLD-KQ. The three-factor CFA model did not demonstrate adequacy above that of the single factor CFA model. The results provide initial support for internal consistency and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial psychometric support for the LLD-KQ was observed while further research on scale dimensionality is warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The LLD-KQ may advance research on behavioral health providers' knowledge of later life depression to evaluate the current state of specialized knowledge in mental health and aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Later Life Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (LLD-KQ): Development and Initial Validation.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail J Laine, Kamila S White, Ann M Steffen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317115.2025.2488953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Later life depression is an important mental health concern requiring knowledge and skill competencies for behavioral health providers. This study developed and evaluated the initial validity of the Later Life Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (LLD-KQ) as a measure of clinical knowledge of later life depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Domain identification, item generation, and content validity were first explored with five geropsychologists. Initially drafted questions were pre-tested with 10 additional geropsychologists. A pool of prospective survey items was administered to licensed masters-level social workers (<i>n</i> = 300) for individual item examination, confirmatory factor analyses testing 1- and 3-factor models, and initial estimates of reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the pool of items pertaining to three identified domains (i.e. psychopathology, assessment/diagnosis, and treatment), 25 items were retained for the final LLD-KQ. The three-factor CFA model did not demonstrate adequacy above that of the single factor CFA model. The results provide initial support for internal consistency and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial psychometric support for the LLD-KQ was observed while further research on scale dimensionality is warranted.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The LLD-KQ may advance research on behavioral health providers' knowledge of later life depression to evaluate the current state of specialized knowledge in mental health and aging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2488953\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2488953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:晚年抑郁是一个重要的心理健康问题,需要行为健康提供者的知识和技能能力。本研究开发并评估了晚年抑郁知识问卷(LLD-KQ)作为衡量晚年抑郁临床知识的初步效度。方法:首先与五名老年心理学家探讨领域识别、项目生成和内容效度。最初起草的问题由另外10名老年心理学家预先测试。对持有执照的硕士级社会工作者(n = 300)实施前瞻性调查项目池,进行单项检查,验证性因素分析,测试1因素和3因素模型,并初步估计信度和效度。结果:从涉及三个确定领域(即精神病理学、评估/诊断和治疗)的项目池中,保留了25个项目作为最终的LLD-KQ。三因素CFA模型的充分性不如单因素CFA模型。结果为内部一致性和结构效度提供了初步支持。结论:初步的心理测量支持观察到LLD-KQ,而进一步的研究尺度维度是必要的。临床意义:LLD-KQ可促进行为健康提供者对晚年抑郁知识的研究,以评估心理健康与老龄化专业知识的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Later Life Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (LLD-KQ): Development and Initial Validation.

Objectives: Later life depression is an important mental health concern requiring knowledge and skill competencies for behavioral health providers. This study developed and evaluated the initial validity of the Later Life Depression Knowledge Questionnaire (LLD-KQ) as a measure of clinical knowledge of later life depression.

Methods: Domain identification, item generation, and content validity were first explored with five geropsychologists. Initially drafted questions were pre-tested with 10 additional geropsychologists. A pool of prospective survey items was administered to licensed masters-level social workers (n = 300) for individual item examination, confirmatory factor analyses testing 1- and 3-factor models, and initial estimates of reliability and validity.

Results: From the pool of items pertaining to three identified domains (i.e. psychopathology, assessment/diagnosis, and treatment), 25 items were retained for the final LLD-KQ. The three-factor CFA model did not demonstrate adequacy above that of the single factor CFA model. The results provide initial support for internal consistency and construct validity.

Conclusions: Initial psychometric support for the LLD-KQ was observed while further research on scale dimensionality is warranted.

Clinical implications: The LLD-KQ may advance research on behavioral health providers' knowledge of later life depression to evaluate the current state of specialized knowledge in mental health and aging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信