Guillaume Lavertu, Maxime Tremblay, Reinemary Michael, Eunice You, Guillaume Chabot
{"title":"一种快速筛选相对传入瞳孔缺损(RAPD)的手机应用程序的验证。","authors":"Guillaume Lavertu, Maxime Tremblay, Reinemary Michael, Eunice You, Guillaume Chabot","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The swinging-flashlight test for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) detection is an important clinical tool in ophthalmology that may be incorrectly performed by general healthcare providers. We designed an affordable, accessible, and easy-to-use cellphone application to screen patients for RAPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created machine-learning software that locates, segments, tracks, and quantifies the kinetic response of the pupils with the goal of identifying RAPD. We tested our application on recordings of 547 participants and compared the software performance against evaluations made by a neuro-ophthalmologist, enabling us to determine the specificity and sensitivity of our software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a RAPD prevalence of 5.84% in our specific population. When comparing videos that were classified as having a RAPD (RAPD+) and having no RAPD (RAPD-), we found a clear difference in kinetic response of the pupil (RAPD+: mean 0.40 ± 0.17; RAPD-: mean 0.76 ± 0.17; p < 0.001). Our method has a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 85%. Given a RAPD prevalence of 5.84% in our group, the software yields a positive predictive value of 28% and a negative predictive value of 99.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We created an efficient screening tool to assist clinicians and medical staff, who may not be accustomed to performing swinging-flashlight tests, in detecting RAPD by using a readily available cellphone application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9606,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a new cellphone application for quick screening of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD).\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Lavertu, Maxime Tremblay, Reinemary Michael, Eunice You, Guillaume Chabot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The swinging-flashlight test for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) detection is an important clinical tool in ophthalmology that may be incorrectly performed by general healthcare providers. We designed an affordable, accessible, and easy-to-use cellphone application to screen patients for RAPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We created machine-learning software that locates, segments, tracks, and quantifies the kinetic response of the pupils with the goal of identifying RAPD. We tested our application on recordings of 547 participants and compared the software performance against evaluations made by a neuro-ophthalmologist, enabling us to determine the specificity and sensitivity of our software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a RAPD prevalence of 5.84% in our specific population. When comparing videos that were classified as having a RAPD (RAPD+) and having no RAPD (RAPD-), we found a clear difference in kinetic response of the pupil (RAPD+: mean 0.40 ± 0.17; RAPD-: mean 0.76 ± 0.17; p < 0.001). Our method has a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 85%. Given a RAPD prevalence of 5.84% in our group, the software yields a positive predictive value of 28% and a negative predictive value of 99.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We created an efficient screening tool to assist clinicians and medical staff, who may not be accustomed to performing swinging-flashlight tests, in detecting RAPD by using a readily available cellphone application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2025.03.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a new cellphone application for quick screening of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD).
Objective: The swinging-flashlight test for relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) detection is an important clinical tool in ophthalmology that may be incorrectly performed by general healthcare providers. We designed an affordable, accessible, and easy-to-use cellphone application to screen patients for RAPD.
Methods: We created machine-learning software that locates, segments, tracks, and quantifies the kinetic response of the pupils with the goal of identifying RAPD. We tested our application on recordings of 547 participants and compared the software performance against evaluations made by a neuro-ophthalmologist, enabling us to determine the specificity and sensitivity of our software.
Results: We identified a RAPD prevalence of 5.84% in our specific population. When comparing videos that were classified as having a RAPD (RAPD+) and having no RAPD (RAPD-), we found a clear difference in kinetic response of the pupil (RAPD+: mean 0.40 ± 0.17; RAPD-: mean 0.76 ± 0.17; p < 0.001). Our method has a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 85%. Given a RAPD prevalence of 5.84% in our group, the software yields a positive predictive value of 28% and a negative predictive value of 99.5%.
Conclusions: We created an efficient screening tool to assist clinicians and medical staff, who may not be accustomed to performing swinging-flashlight tests, in detecting RAPD by using a readily available cellphone application.
期刊介绍:
Official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society.
The Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (CJO) is the official journal of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society and is committed to timely publication of original, peer-reviewed ophthalmology and vision science articles.