最小微血管阻力:连续和大剂量热调节的一致性。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thabo Mahendiran, Daniëlle Keulards, Nico H J Pijls, Michele Viscusi, Emanuele Gallinoro, Dario Bertolone, Peter Damman, Niels van Royen, Jeroen Sonck, Carlos Collet, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Paul Knaapen, Bernard De Bruyne
{"title":"最小微血管阻力:连续和大剂量热调节的一致性。","authors":"Thabo Mahendiran, Daniëlle Keulards, Nico H J Pijls, Michele Viscusi, Emanuele Gallinoro, Dario Bertolone, Peter Damman, Niels van Royen, Jeroen Sonck, Carlos Collet, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Paul Knaapen, Bernard De Bruyne","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous thermodilution quantifies absolute microvascular resistance (R<sub>μ</sub>, Wood units), a key metric of microvascular function. R<sub>μ</sub> is minimal during hyperemia (R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>) with increased R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> suggestive of microvascular dysfunction. Bolus thermodilution measures the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), a dimensionless surrogate of R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by continuous thermodilution (invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>) with the gold standard [<sup>15</sup>O]H<sub>2</sub>O positron emission tomography (PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>), and assessed the correlation between invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the accuracy of invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> was assessed in a cohort of 24 patients in which both invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> were measured in the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) arteries, corresponding to 46 measurements of R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> in total (LAD = 24, LCX = 22). Next, agreement between invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR was evaluated in the LAD in a cohort of 250 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited a strong correlation with PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> (r = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.92], p < 0.001), with good absolute agreement (ICC 0.82 [95% CI 0.70-0.90], p < 0.001). Passing-Bablok regression analysis found no significant systematic (intercept A: 54.53 [95% CI -18.95 to 120.96]) or proportional (slope B: 0.90 [95% CI 0.71-1.15]) bias between invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>. However, invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited no significant correlation with IMR (r = 0.11 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.23], p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> derived from continuous thermodilution exhibited excellent agreement with noninvasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by [<sup>15</sup>O]H<sub>2</sub>O PET, the current non-invasive standard of reference. In contrast, IMR exhibited no significant correlation with invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal Microvascular Resistance: Agreement Between Continuous and Bolus Thermodilution.\",\"authors\":\"Thabo Mahendiran, Daniëlle Keulards, Nico H J Pijls, Michele Viscusi, Emanuele Gallinoro, Dario Bertolone, Peter Damman, Niels van Royen, Jeroen Sonck, Carlos Collet, Adriaan Wilgenhof, Paul Knaapen, Bernard De Bruyne\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous thermodilution quantifies absolute microvascular resistance (R<sub>μ</sub>, Wood units), a key metric of microvascular function. R<sub>μ</sub> is minimal during hyperemia (R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>) with increased R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> suggestive of microvascular dysfunction. Bolus thermodilution measures the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), a dimensionless surrogate of R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by continuous thermodilution (invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>) with the gold standard [<sup>15</sup>O]H<sub>2</sub>O positron emission tomography (PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>), and assessed the correlation between invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the accuracy of invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> was assessed in a cohort of 24 patients in which both invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> were measured in the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) arteries, corresponding to 46 measurements of R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> in total (LAD = 24, LCX = 22). Next, agreement between invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and IMR was evaluated in the LAD in a cohort of 250 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited a strong correlation with PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> (r = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.92], p < 0.001), with good absolute agreement (ICC 0.82 [95% CI 0.70-0.90], p < 0.001). Passing-Bablok regression analysis found no significant systematic (intercept A: 54.53 [95% CI -18.95 to 120.96]) or proportional (slope B: 0.90 [95% CI 0.71-1.15]) bias between invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> and PET R<sub>μ,hyper</sub>. However, invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> exhibited no significant correlation with IMR (r = 0.11 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.23], p = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> derived from continuous thermodilution exhibited excellent agreement with noninvasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> measured by [<sup>15</sup>O]H<sub>2</sub>O PET, the current non-invasive standard of reference. In contrast, IMR exhibited no significant correlation with invasive R<sub>μ,hyper</sub> in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:连续热稀释可量化微血管绝对阻力(Rμ,伍德单位),这是衡量微血管功能的关键指标。高充血时 Rμ 最小(Rμ,hyper),Rμ,hyper 增加提示微血管功能障碍。目的:我们比较了连续热稀释测量的 Rμ,hyper(有创 Rμ,hyper)和金标准[15O]H2O 正电子发射断层扫描(PET Rμ,hyper),并评估了有创 Rμ,hyper 和 IMR 之间的相关性:首先,在一组 24 名患者中评估了有创 Rμ,hyper 的准确性,其中有创 Rμ,hyper 和 PET Rμ,hyper 均在左前降支动脉(LAD)和环挠动脉(LCX)进行了测量,总共测量了 46 次 Rμ,hyper (LAD = 24 次,LCX = 22 次)。接下来,在一组 250 名心绞痛和冠状动脉无阻塞的患者中评估了有创 Rμ,hyper 与 LAD IMR 之间的一致性:有创Rμ,hyper与PET Rμ,hyper表现出很强的相关性(r = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.92],p μ,hyper和PET Rμ,hyper)。然而,侵袭性Rμ,hyper与IMR无明显相关性(r = 0.11 [95% CI -0.01至0.23],p = 0.08):结论:通过连续热稀释得出的有创 Rμ,hyper与通过[15O]H2O PET(目前的无创参考标准)测量的无创 Rμ,hyper具有极好的一致性。相比之下,在心绞痛和冠状动脉无阻塞的患者中,IMR 与有创 Rμ,hyper 没有明显的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal Microvascular Resistance: Agreement Between Continuous and Bolus Thermodilution.

Background: Continuous thermodilution quantifies absolute microvascular resistance (Rμ, Wood units), a key metric of microvascular function. Rμ is minimal during hyperemia (Rμ,hyper) with increased Rμ,hyper suggestive of microvascular dysfunction. Bolus thermodilution measures the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), a dimensionless surrogate of Rμ,hyper.

Aims: We compared Rμ,hyper measured by continuous thermodilution (invasive Rμ,hyper) with the gold standard [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET Rμ,hyper), and assessed the correlation between invasive Rμ,hyper and IMR.

Methods: First, the accuracy of invasive Rμ,hyper was assessed in a cohort of 24 patients in which both invasive Rμ,hyper and PET Rμ,hyper were measured in the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCX) arteries, corresponding to 46 measurements of Rμ,hyper in total (LAD = 24, LCX = 22). Next, agreement between invasive Rμ,hyper and IMR was evaluated in the LAD in a cohort of 250 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.

Results: Invasive Rμ,hyper exhibited a strong correlation with PET Rμ,hyper (r = 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.92], p < 0.001), with good absolute agreement (ICC 0.82 [95% CI 0.70-0.90], p < 0.001). Passing-Bablok regression analysis found no significant systematic (intercept A: 54.53 [95% CI -18.95 to 120.96]) or proportional (slope B: 0.90 [95% CI 0.71-1.15]) bias between invasive Rμ,hyper and PET Rμ,hyper. However, invasive Rμ,hyper exhibited no significant correlation with IMR (r = 0.11 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.23], p = 0.08).

Conclusion: Invasive Rμ,hyper derived from continuous thermodilution exhibited excellent agreement with noninvasive Rμ,hyper measured by [15O]H2O PET, the current non-invasive standard of reference. In contrast, IMR exhibited no significant correlation with invasive Rμ,hyper in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信