COVID-19大流行时期肌肉骨骼疾病医学康复后重返工作岗位:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jan Mathis Elling, Nadine Sänger, Betje Schwarz, Nico Seifert, Christian Hetzel
{"title":"COVID-19大流行时期肌肉骨骼疾病医学康复后重返工作岗位:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jan Mathis Elling, Nadine Sänger, Betje Schwarz, Nico Seifert, Christian Hetzel","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe and explain the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related measures on return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Three cohorts: reference (rehabilitation and RTW pre-pandemic), pandemic 1 (rehabilitation pre-pandemic, RTW during pandemic), pandemic 2 (rehabilitation and RTW during pandemic).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals who underwent multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders through the German Pension Insurance system between January 2018 and December 2021 (N = 688,127).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>A successful and stable RTW was operationalized as having employment subject to social insurance contributions in the ninth to twelfth month following rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analysis revealed a RTW rate of 67.2% in the reference cohort, a slight decline in pandemic cohort 1 (66.3%) and a more pronounced decrease in pandemic cohort 2 (63.1%). In contrast, average marginal predictions from a logistic model including various covariates showed that both pandemic cohorts (63.8%, 64.4%) exhibited similarly reduced predicted probabilities of RTW compared to the reference cohort (66.5%). Individuals with sick leave durations exceeding 6 months, compared to those with shorter sick leaves, were more negatively affected by pandemic cohort 1; however, this effect recovered in pandemic cohort 2. The interaction between cohort and income did not show any amplifying effect of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The logistic model revealed no differences in predicted probabilities of RTW between pandemic cohort 2 and pandemic cohort 1, suggesting that orthopedic rehabilitation remained robust in maintaining RTW outcomes despite pandemic-related challenges. The findings offer mixed evidence regarding the question whether the pandemic amplified pre-existing barriers to RTW.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to Work Following Medical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Mathis Elling, Nadine Sänger, Betje Schwarz, Nico Seifert, Christian Hetzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe and explain the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related measures on return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Three cohorts: reference (rehabilitation and RTW pre-pandemic), pandemic 1 (rehabilitation pre-pandemic, RTW during pandemic), pandemic 2 (rehabilitation and RTW during pandemic).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals who underwent multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders through the German Pension Insurance system between January 2018 and December 2021 (N = 688,127).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>A successful and stable RTW was operationalized as having employment subject to social insurance contributions in the ninth to twelfth month following rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analysis revealed a RTW rate of 67.2% in the reference cohort, a slight decline in pandemic cohort 1 (66.3%) and a more pronounced decrease in pandemic cohort 2 (63.1%). In contrast, average marginal predictions from a logistic model including various covariates showed that both pandemic cohorts (63.8%, 64.4%) exhibited similarly reduced predicted probabilities of RTW compared to the reference cohort (66.5%). Individuals with sick leave durations exceeding 6 months, compared to those with shorter sick leaves, were more negatively affected by pandemic cohort 1; however, this effect recovered in pandemic cohort 2. The interaction between cohort and income did not show any amplifying effect of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The logistic model revealed no differences in predicted probabilities of RTW between pandemic cohort 2 and pandemic cohort 1, suggesting that orthopedic rehabilitation remained robust in maintaining RTW outcomes despite pandemic-related challenges. The findings offer mixed evidence regarding the question whether the pandemic amplified pre-existing barriers to RTW.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述并解释COVID-19大流行及其相关措施对肌肉骨骼疾病多模式医疗康复后重返工作岗位(RTW)结果的影响:设计:回顾性队列研究:三个队列:参考队列(大流行前的康复和复工)、大流行 1 队列(大流行前的康复、大流行期间的复工)、大流行 2 队列(大流行期间的康复和复工):主要结果测量:主要结果测量指标:成功和稳定的复工是指在康复后的第九个月至第十二个月有工作并缴纳社会保险费:描述性分析显示,参照队列的复工率为 67.2%,大流行队列 1 的复工率略有下降(66.3%),大流行队列 2 的复工率下降更为明显(63.1%)。与此相反,包含各种协变量的逻辑模型的平均边际预测结果显示,与参照队列(66.5%)相比,两个大流行队列(63.8%、64.4%)的预测复工概率都有类似的下降。与病假时间较短的人相比,病假时间超过 6 个月的人受到大流行组群 1 的负面影响更大;然而,这种影响在大流行组群 2 中有所恢复。队列与收入之间的交互作用并未显示出大流行的任何放大效应:逻辑模型显示,大流行组群 2 与大流行组群 1 之间的预测 RTW 概率没有差异,这表明尽管存在与大流行相关的挑战,矫形康复在维持 RTW 结果方面仍然很稳健。对于大流行是否扩大了原有的复健障碍这一问题,研究结果提供了不同的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Return to Work Following Medical Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: To describe and explain the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related measures on return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders.

Design: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Three cohorts: reference (rehabilitation and RTW pre-pandemic), pandemic 1 (rehabilitation pre-pandemic, RTW during pandemic), pandemic 2 (rehabilitation and RTW during pandemic).

Participants: Individuals who underwent multimodal medical rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders through the German Pension Insurance system between January 2018 and December 2021 (N = 688,127).

Main outcome measure: A successful and stable RTW was operationalized as having employment subject to social insurance contributions in the ninth to twelfth month following rehabilitation.

Results: Descriptive analysis revealed a RTW rate of 67.2% in the reference cohort, a slight decline in pandemic cohort 1 (66.3%) and a more pronounced decrease in pandemic cohort 2 (63.1%). In contrast, average marginal predictions from a logistic model including various covariates showed that both pandemic cohorts (63.8%, 64.4%) exhibited similarly reduced predicted probabilities of RTW compared to the reference cohort (66.5%). Individuals with sick leave durations exceeding 6 months, compared to those with shorter sick leaves, were more negatively affected by pandemic cohort 1; however, this effect recovered in pandemic cohort 2. The interaction between cohort and income did not show any amplifying effect of the pandemic.

Conclusion: The logistic model revealed no differences in predicted probabilities of RTW between pandemic cohort 2 and pandemic cohort 1, suggesting that orthopedic rehabilitation remained robust in maintaining RTW outcomes despite pandemic-related challenges. The findings offer mixed evidence regarding the question whether the pandemic amplified pre-existing barriers to RTW.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信