利用追踪技术减少耳鼻喉设备丢失对财务和患者护理的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
J Bass, M Patel, K Kapoor
{"title":"利用追踪技术减少耳鼻喉设备丢失对财务和患者护理的影响。","authors":"J Bass, M Patel, K Kapoor","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effective treatment of a patient in a timely manner requires specialist equipment, including in ear, nose and throat (ENT) services, where orifices require careful inspection. Otoscopy, flexible nasendoscopy, peritonsillar abscess drainage and nasal cautery are all common practices and cannot be successfully completed without the necessary equipment. These tasks all require expensive equipment that can easily be misplaced in a busy hospital. A paucity of equipment can delay patient assessment and negatively impact treatment, as well as reduce clinician efficiency and effectiveness. Here, we investigate the impact of equipment loss, and discuss a cost-effective solution to the problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed ENT departments from 15 different trusts on how equipment loss impacted their patients, staff and their department financially. We also calculated the cost of equipment lost in our department over the course of a year. We subsequently placed trackers on our equipment and calculated the cost of lost equipment after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15 trusts surveyed, 13 responded. Our survey demonstrated the average cost of lost items to be more than £4,900 per department, with concurrent delays in treatment and a reduction in patient-facing time. No equipment was lost after the trackers were placed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of commercially available tracking technology can help reduce the amount of time taken to locate equipment, prevent incurring higher costs and, most importantly, improve patient safety, with an estimated return on investment of more than 3000% and an increase in direct clinical care simultaneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilising tracking technology to reduce the financial and patient care impact of lost ear, nose and throat equipment.\",\"authors\":\"J Bass, M Patel, K Kapoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The effective treatment of a patient in a timely manner requires specialist equipment, including in ear, nose and throat (ENT) services, where orifices require careful inspection. Otoscopy, flexible nasendoscopy, peritonsillar abscess drainage and nasal cautery are all common practices and cannot be successfully completed without the necessary equipment. These tasks all require expensive equipment that can easily be misplaced in a busy hospital. A paucity of equipment can delay patient assessment and negatively impact treatment, as well as reduce clinician efficiency and effectiveness. Here, we investigate the impact of equipment loss, and discuss a cost-effective solution to the problem.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed ENT departments from 15 different trusts on how equipment loss impacted their patients, staff and their department financially. We also calculated the cost of equipment lost in our department over the course of a year. We subsequently placed trackers on our equipment and calculated the cost of lost equipment after 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15 trusts surveyed, 13 responded. Our survey demonstrated the average cost of lost items to be more than £4,900 per department, with concurrent delays in treatment and a reduction in patient-facing time. No equipment was lost after the trackers were placed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of commercially available tracking technology can help reduce the amount of time taken to locate equipment, prevent incurring higher costs and, most importantly, improve patient safety, with an estimated return on investment of more than 3000% and an increase in direct clinical care simultaneously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:及时有效地治疗病人需要专业设备,包括耳鼻喉科(ENT)服务中需要仔细检查口腔的设备。耳镜检查、鼻内窥镜检查、腹腔周围脓肿引流和鼻腔烧灼都是常见的操作,没有必要的设备就无法顺利完成。这些工作都需要昂贵的设备,而这些设备在繁忙的医院中很容易被放错位置。设备不足会延误患者评估,对治疗产生负面影响,并降低临床医生的效率和效果。在此,我们调查了设备丢失的影响,并讨论了一个具有成本效益的解决方案:方法:我们对 15 家不同托管机构的耳鼻喉科进行了调查,了解设备丢失对患者、员工和科室的经济影响。我们还计算了本部门一年内设备丢失的成本。随后,我们在设备上安装了追踪器,并计算了 12 个月后丢失设备的成本:结果:在接受调查的 15 家信托机构中,有 13 家做出了回应。我们的调查显示,每个科室丢失设备的平均成本超过 4,900 英镑,同时延误了治疗,减少了面对病人的时间。放置追踪器后没有丢失任何设备:使用市面上销售的追踪技术有助于减少寻找设备所需的时间,避免产生更高的成本,最重要的是,还能提高病人的安全,估计投资回报率超过 3000%,同时还能增加直接临床护理的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilising tracking technology to reduce the financial and patient care impact of lost ear, nose and throat equipment.

Introduction: The effective treatment of a patient in a timely manner requires specialist equipment, including in ear, nose and throat (ENT) services, where orifices require careful inspection. Otoscopy, flexible nasendoscopy, peritonsillar abscess drainage and nasal cautery are all common practices and cannot be successfully completed without the necessary equipment. These tasks all require expensive equipment that can easily be misplaced in a busy hospital. A paucity of equipment can delay patient assessment and negatively impact treatment, as well as reduce clinician efficiency and effectiveness. Here, we investigate the impact of equipment loss, and discuss a cost-effective solution to the problem.

Methods: We surveyed ENT departments from 15 different trusts on how equipment loss impacted their patients, staff and their department financially. We also calculated the cost of equipment lost in our department over the course of a year. We subsequently placed trackers on our equipment and calculated the cost of lost equipment after 12 months.

Results: Of the 15 trusts surveyed, 13 responded. Our survey demonstrated the average cost of lost items to be more than £4,900 per department, with concurrent delays in treatment and a reduction in patient-facing time. No equipment was lost after the trackers were placed.

Conclusions: The use of commercially available tracking technology can help reduce the amount of time taken to locate equipment, prevent incurring higher costs and, most importantly, improve patient safety, with an estimated return on investment of more than 3000% and an increase in direct clinical care simultaneously.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信