结直肠手术的“中心”模式:可行的模式转变?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
P Janardhanan, A Khalid, M H Anwaar, R Williams, E Timms, S Ward, S Karandikar, M Dattani
{"title":"结直肠手术的“中心”模式:可行的模式转变?","authors":"P Janardhanan, A Khalid, M H Anwaar, R Williams, E Timms, S Ward, S Karandikar, M Dattani","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nationally, in the aftermath of the first COVID-19 lockdown, the waiting list for elective surgery is approximately 7 million. To ameliorate an evolving crisis and improve system resilience, the Royal College of Surgeons of England proposed a 'New Deal for Surgery', promoting COVID-light sites and elective hubs. We evaluate the short-term outcomes, safety and sustainability of the hub model at a large National Health Service trust.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All major elective colorectal operations performed at the hub between 8 March 2021 and 8 March 2022 were included for analysis. Pertinent data on patient demographics, operative performance and postoperative outcomes were analysed using SPSS 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 401 cases were analysed. There was one same-day cancellation because of the unavailability of beds (0.2%). Median distance displacement for patients for their primary surgery was +3.2 miles. Twenty-one patients (5.2%) required postoperative blood transfusion. One patient had nosocomial COVID-19 (0.2%), severe complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 were observed in 33 patient (8.2%) and transfer-out for higher level care occurred in 34 cases (8.5%). Forty-six 30-day readmissions (11.5%) and two deaths (0.4%) were noted. Median length of stay was 6 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The volume of major colorectal surgery at the hub, with acceptable incidence of major complication, transfer-out and minimal patient displacement, attests to the efficacy and safety of the new model.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'hub' model for colorectal surgery: a viable paradigm shift?\",\"authors\":\"P Janardhanan, A Khalid, M H Anwaar, R Williams, E Timms, S Ward, S Karandikar, M Dattani\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nationally, in the aftermath of the first COVID-19 lockdown, the waiting list for elective surgery is approximately 7 million. To ameliorate an evolving crisis and improve system resilience, the Royal College of Surgeons of England proposed a 'New Deal for Surgery', promoting COVID-light sites and elective hubs. We evaluate the short-term outcomes, safety and sustainability of the hub model at a large National Health Service trust.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All major elective colorectal operations performed at the hub between 8 March 2021 and 8 March 2022 were included for analysis. Pertinent data on patient demographics, operative performance and postoperative outcomes were analysed using SPSS 27.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 401 cases were analysed. There was one same-day cancellation because of the unavailability of beds (0.2%). Median distance displacement for patients for their primary surgery was +3.2 miles. Twenty-one patients (5.2%) required postoperative blood transfusion. One patient had nosocomial COVID-19 (0.2%), severe complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 were observed in 33 patient (8.2%) and transfer-out for higher level care occurred in 34 cases (8.5%). Forty-six 30-day readmissions (11.5%) and two deaths (0.4%) were noted. Median length of stay was 6 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The volume of major colorectal surgery at the hub, with acceptable incidence of major complication, transfer-out and minimal patient displacement, attests to the efficacy and safety of the new model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全国范围内,在第一次COVID-19封锁之后,等待择期手术的名单约为700万人。为了缓解不断演变的危机并提高系统弹性,英格兰皇家外科医生学院提出了一项“外科新政”,促进无COVID-light站点和选择性中心。我们评估了一个大型国家卫生服务信托中心模式的短期结果、安全性和可持续性。方法:纳入2021年3月8日至2022年3月8日期间在该中心进行的所有重大择期结直肠手术进行分析。使用SPSS 27对患者人口统计学、手术表现和术后结果的相关数据进行分析。结果:共分析401例。由于床位不足,当天取消了一次(0.2%)。初次手术患者的中位位移距离为+3.2英里。术后需输血21例(5.2%)。院内感染1例(0.2%),Clavien-Dindo分级≥3级严重并发症33例(8.2%),转院接受更高级别护理34例(8.5%)。报告了46例30天再入院(11.5%)和2例死亡(0.4%)。中位住院时间为6天。结论:该中心的大肠癌手术量、主要并发症发生率、转移率和患者移位率均可接受,证明了该新模式的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 'hub' model for colorectal surgery: a viable paradigm shift?

Introduction: Nationally, in the aftermath of the first COVID-19 lockdown, the waiting list for elective surgery is approximately 7 million. To ameliorate an evolving crisis and improve system resilience, the Royal College of Surgeons of England proposed a 'New Deal for Surgery', promoting COVID-light sites and elective hubs. We evaluate the short-term outcomes, safety and sustainability of the hub model at a large National Health Service trust.

Methods: All major elective colorectal operations performed at the hub between 8 March 2021 and 8 March 2022 were included for analysis. Pertinent data on patient demographics, operative performance and postoperative outcomes were analysed using SPSS 27.

Results: In total, 401 cases were analysed. There was one same-day cancellation because of the unavailability of beds (0.2%). Median distance displacement for patients for their primary surgery was +3.2 miles. Twenty-one patients (5.2%) required postoperative blood transfusion. One patient had nosocomial COVID-19 (0.2%), severe complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 were observed in 33 patient (8.2%) and transfer-out for higher level care occurred in 34 cases (8.5%). Forty-six 30-day readmissions (11.5%) and two deaths (0.4%) were noted. Median length of stay was 6 days.

Conclusions: The volume of major colorectal surgery at the hub, with acceptable incidence of major complication, transfer-out and minimal patient displacement, attests to the efficacy and safety of the new model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信