活体肝移植左肾静脉结扎的远期疗效:一项20年的研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hyo Jung Ko, Shin Hwang, Jihoon Kang, Deok-Bog Moon, Chul-Soo Ahn, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Ki-Hun Kim, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee
{"title":"活体肝移植左肾静脉结扎的远期疗效:一项20年的研究。","authors":"Hyo Jung Ko, Shin Hwang, Jihoon Kang, Deok-Bog Moon, Chul-Soo Ahn, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Ki-Hun Kim, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.12659/AOT.947492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Persistence of large spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SSRS) can result in graft failure in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to portal flow steal; thus, it is necessary to block SSRS to ensure sufficient portal blood flow. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective 20-year observational follow-up study subsequent to a prior prospective study to evaluate the long-term outcomes following ligation of the proximal left renal vein (LRV). Between October 2001 and January 2005, 44 liver cirrhosis patients underwent LDLT with LRV ligation. These patients were followed up until April 2024 or patient death. RESULTS Portal flow was significantly increased after LRV ligation. Renal function recovered uneventfully after LDLT in 40 patients. Eighteen patients died due to cancer recurrence (n=6), pneumonia (n=3), and other causes (n=9), thus 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year overall patient survival rates were 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.8%, and 59.1%, respectively. Solitary atrophy of the left kidney was not observed. SSRS was completely resolved in 20 patients, but the other 20 patients showed persistently identifiable SSRS of variable extents to date or at patient death. The LRV was reopened to make large SSRS in another 4 patients, in which retrograde transvenous obliteration was performed in 2 for variceal bleeding control and in another 2 for portal flow augmentation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that LRV ligation is a safe and effective method to control SSRS. Currently, direct ligation of the SSRS is preferred, but LRV ligation still can be a good therapeutic option when direct access to SSRS is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"30 ","pages":"e947492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Left Renal Vein Ligation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A 20-Year Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hyo Jung Ko, Shin Hwang, Jihoon Kang, Deok-Bog Moon, Chul-Soo Ahn, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Ki-Hun Kim, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Young-In Yoon, Sung-Gyu Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AOT.947492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Persistence of large spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SSRS) can result in graft failure in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to portal flow steal; thus, it is necessary to block SSRS to ensure sufficient portal blood flow. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective 20-year observational follow-up study subsequent to a prior prospective study to evaluate the long-term outcomes following ligation of the proximal left renal vein (LRV). Between October 2001 and January 2005, 44 liver cirrhosis patients underwent LDLT with LRV ligation. These patients were followed up until April 2024 or patient death. RESULTS Portal flow was significantly increased after LRV ligation. Renal function recovered uneventfully after LDLT in 40 patients. Eighteen patients died due to cancer recurrence (n=6), pneumonia (n=3), and other causes (n=9), thus 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year overall patient survival rates were 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.8%, and 59.1%, respectively. Solitary atrophy of the left kidney was not observed. SSRS was completely resolved in 20 patients, but the other 20 patients showed persistently identifiable SSRS of variable extents to date or at patient death. The LRV was reopened to make large SSRS in another 4 patients, in which retrograde transvenous obliteration was performed in 2 for variceal bleeding control and in another 2 for portal flow augmentation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that LRV ligation is a safe and effective method to control SSRS. Currently, direct ligation of the SSRS is preferred, but LRV ligation still can be a good therapeutic option when direct access to SSRS is not feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e947492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.947492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.947492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 大型自发性脾肾分流(SSRS)的持续存在会导致成人活体肝移植(LDLT)中门静脉血流窃取而导致移植失败;因此,有必要阻断 SSRS 以确保充足的门静脉血流。材料与方法 我们在之前的前瞻性研究基础上进行了一项为期20年的回顾性观察随访研究,以评估结扎左肾近端静脉(LRV)后的长期疗效。2001 年 10 月至 2005 年 1 月期间,44 名肝硬化患者接受了 LDLT 和 LRV 结扎术。对这些患者进行了随访,直至 2024 年 4 月或患者死亡。结果 结扎 LRV 后门静脉流量明显增加。40 名患者在 LDLT 术后肾功能恢复良好。18名患者死于癌症复发(6人)、肺炎(3人)和其他原因(9人),因此患者的1年、5年、10年和20年总生存率分别为95.5%、86.4%、81.8%和59.1%。未观察到左肾孤立性萎缩。有 20 名患者的 SSRS 已完全消除,但另外 20 名患者至今或在患者死亡时仍有不同程度的可识别 SSRS。另外 4 名患者的 LRV 再次开放,形成了较大的 SSRS,其中 2 人因静脉曲张出血控制而进行了逆行经静脉阻塞,另外 2 人因门静脉血流增强而进行了逆行经静脉阻塞。结论 本研究表明,LRV 结扎是控制 SSRS 的一种安全有效的方法。目前,直接结扎 SSRS 是首选,但在无法直接进入 SSRS 的情况下,LRV 结扎仍不失为一种良好的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Outcomes of Left Renal Vein Ligation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A 20-Year Study.

BACKGROUND Persistence of large spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SSRS) can result in graft failure in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to portal flow steal; thus, it is necessary to block SSRS to ensure sufficient portal blood flow. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective 20-year observational follow-up study subsequent to a prior prospective study to evaluate the long-term outcomes following ligation of the proximal left renal vein (LRV). Between October 2001 and January 2005, 44 liver cirrhosis patients underwent LDLT with LRV ligation. These patients were followed up until April 2024 or patient death. RESULTS Portal flow was significantly increased after LRV ligation. Renal function recovered uneventfully after LDLT in 40 patients. Eighteen patients died due to cancer recurrence (n=6), pneumonia (n=3), and other causes (n=9), thus 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year overall patient survival rates were 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.8%, and 59.1%, respectively. Solitary atrophy of the left kidney was not observed. SSRS was completely resolved in 20 patients, but the other 20 patients showed persistently identifiable SSRS of variable extents to date or at patient death. The LRV was reopened to make large SSRS in another 4 patients, in which retrograde transvenous obliteration was performed in 2 for variceal bleeding control and in another 2 for portal flow augmentation. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that LRV ligation is a safe and effective method to control SSRS. Currently, direct ligation of the SSRS is preferred, but LRV ligation still can be a good therapeutic option when direct access to SSRS is not feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation. Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication. Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信